AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear split between these two processors, with the Intel Core 5 213PTE taking 7 of the 11 shared PassMark benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G wins 4. The Intel part’s biggest advantages come in workloads that scale with raw compute throughput. In floating-point math, the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 71,722 against 50,778 for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, a 29.2% lead. The gap is even larger in the physics test, where Intel delivers 2,199 versus 1,022, a 53.5% advantage. Prime number finding also favors Intel decisively: 157 versus 58, which translates to a 63.1% margin. These results indicate that the Intel architecture handles mathematically intensive, single-direction workloads with substantially higher efficiency.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G counters in several specialized tasks. Data compression is a 13.3% win for AMD, with scores of 295,730 versus 261,083. Data encryption shows the largest AMD victory at 34.9%: 19,450 versus 14,413. Extended instructions also favor AMD by 26.9%, with 20,487 against 16,146. Random string sorting goes to AMD by 8.9%, at 32,771 versus 30,106. These wins suggest that the AMD part retains an edge in cryptographic and compression workloads, likely due to its instruction set implementation.

In multithreaded performance, Intel leads by a smaller margin. The PassMark multithread score is 25,590 for Intel against 23,858 for AMD, a 6.8% difference. Integer math is nearly even, with Intel at 93,109 and AMD at 90,270, a 3% edge for Intel. Single-thread performance also favors Intel: 3,718 versus 3,366, a 9.5% advantage. The aggregate average benchmark score confirms the overall picture: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49,196, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE averages 32,924. However, that average is skewed by the AMD part’s inclusion of a broader set of PassMark tests in its benchmark record. The head-to-head PassMark results, which compare identical tests, show Intel winning the majority of workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE leads with a PassMark single-thread score of 3,718, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 3,366, a 9.5% advantage for Intel.

Q: How do the two compare in data encryption?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G wins by 34.9%, scoring 19,450 versus 14,413 for the Intel Core 5 213PTE.

Q: What is the difference in multithreaded performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 25,590 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 6.8% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G’s 23,858.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G does not.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average benchmark score of 49,196, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average of 32,924.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G wins in workloads that involve data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, and random string sorting. The data shows a 13.3% advantage in compression, a 34.9% advantage in encryption, a 26.9% advantage in extended instructions, and an 8.9% advantage in random string sorting. These are tasks often found in file archiving, secure communication, and specialized database operations. The AMD part’s 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, versus the Intel part’s 83rd percentile, also reflects its stronger standing in the broader PassMark database.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in physics simulation, floating-point math, integer math, prime number finding, multithreaded throughput, and single-thread performance. Its 53.5% lead in physics and 63.1% lead in prime numbers are the largest margins in the head-to-head set. The multithread win of 6.8% and the single-thread win of 9.5% make it the better choice for general productivity and rendering tasks that rely on both single-core responsiveness and multi-core scaling. The Intel part’s 5.20 GHz boost clock, higher than the AMD part’s 4.60 GHz, aligns with its single-thread advantage.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Thermal design power also differs: the AMD part is rated at 65 W, while the Intel part is rated at 45 W. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G supports DDR4 only, with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is available on the Intel part but not on the AMD part. PCIe capability favors Intel: the Core 5 213PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the AMD part provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon Vega 8, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 213PTE is $221. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has no recorded launch MSRP. The release dates also differ, with the AMD part released in 2024 and the Intel part released in 2026. Both parts have locked multipliers, and both are currently marked as Active in production.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 180 mm² and 10,700 million transistors. It uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no die size or transistor count recorded. Its architecture is listed as Bartlett Lake, with the generation identified as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake).

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Intel part likely contribute to its strong performance in integer math and physics tests. The AMD part’s smaller cache, combined with its higher base clock, may explain its efficiency in compression and encryption tasks.

Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, but the underlying implementations diverge. The AMD part belongs to the 5000 series, while the Intel part has no series designation. The AMD part is a desktop segment processor, as is the Intel part. The process node difference (7 nm versus 10 nm) favors AMD in transistor density, but the Intel part compensates with a higher boost clock and larger caches.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward choice based on workload. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is the stronger option for encryption, compression, extended instruction workloads, and random string sorting. Its wins in these areas are substantial, with the encryption margin at 34.9% and the extended instructions margin at 26.9%. The AMD part also holds a higher average benchmark score of 49,196 and a 90th percentile ranking, which reflects its overall standing in the database.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the better choice for physics, floating-point math, integer math, prime number finding, multithreaded tasks, and single-thread performance. Its 53.5% lead in physics and 63.1% lead in prime numbers are decisive. The single-thread advantage of 9.5% and the multithread advantage of 6.8% make it suitable for general-purpose computing, rendering, and simulation. The Intel part also offers a lower TDP of 45 W versus 65 W, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5, and a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The recorded data indicates that the Intel Core 5 213PTE wins the majority of head-to-head benchmarks, 7 out of 11, and should be selected for users prioritizing compute-heavy tasks. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G should be selected for users prioritizing data security and compression workloads, where its margins are largest.