AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164?

A: Both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a base clock of 4.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz. Both share the same 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the difference in process node and die size?

A: Both are fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. The Ryzen 7 8700F has a die size of 178 mm², while the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a larger die size of 233 mm².

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F does not.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a TDP of 65 watts, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a TDP of 28 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has an average benchmark score of 52901, which is significantly higher than the 30746 average of the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F. This places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 82nd percentile for the 8700F.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head data shows a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F wins 9 out of the 11 recorded benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins 2.

The Ryzen 7 8700F dominates in all multi-threaded and parallel workload tests. Its largest margins come in passmark_find_prime_numbers (38% ahead), passmark_data_encryption (37.8% ahead), and passmark_random_string_sorting (30.5% ahead). It also leads in passmark_physics (28.3%), passmark_multithread (19.3%), passmark_extended_instructions (17.7%), passmark_data_compression (15.3%), passmark_integer_math (14.1%), and passmark_floating_point_math (12.2%). These results indicate that the 8700F is the stronger processor for compute-heavy applications that benefit from sustained multi-core execution, such as rendering, encryption workloads, and data processing.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins both single-thread tests: passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, each with a score of 4029 compared to the 8700F's 3872. This represents a 3.9% advantage in single-thread performance. The P164 also holds a higher percentile ranking (91st) and a much higher average benchmark score (52901), although that average is drawn from a different, smaller set of tests. For tasks that rely primarily on single-core responsiveness, the P164 is the faster part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different architectural generations and target different market segments. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix, and it is part of the 8000 series for desktop systems. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, and it is listed under the Ryzen AI Embedded series for mobile platforms.

The cache hierarchies are distinct. The Ryzen 7 8700F provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, but only 8 MB of L3 cache. Despite having a smaller L3 cache, the P164 uses the newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c core design, which contributes to its higher single-thread score.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A), while the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 includes a Radeon 880M iGPU. This makes the P164 a more complete solution for compact or embedded systems where a discrete graphics card is not available.

The transistor count is only provided for the Ryzen 7 8700F, which has 25,000 million transistors. The P164's transistor count is not recorded, but its larger die size (233 mm² vs. 178 mm²) suggests additional logic, likely including the integrated graphics and the newer core architecture.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The Ryzen 7 8700F has a base clock of 4.10 GHz, while the P164 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz; both boost to 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 65 watts for the 8700F and 28 watts for the P164. The socket is different: the 8700F uses AMD Socket AM5, while the P164 uses AMD Socket FP8.

Memory support differs as well. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports DDR5 only, while the P164 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the memory bandwidth is higher on the P164 at 89.6 GB/s compared to 83.2 GB/s for the 8700F. ECC memory is supported on the P164 but not on the 8700F.

PCIe lane counts also differ. The Ryzen 7 8700F provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the P164 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The 8700F has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the P164 does not. The market segment is desktop for the 8700F and mobile for the P164.

The release dates are recorded: the 8700F was released on 2024-03-31, and the P164 is dated 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP for the 8700F is $270, while no launch MSRP is listed for the P164.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between the two processors is available across 11 PassMark tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F wins 9 of these, with the largest margins in passmark_find_prime_numbers (98 vs. 71, a 38% difference) and passmark_data_encryption (22117 vs. 16055, a 37.8% difference). These are substantial gaps that indicate a meaningful performance advantage in integer-heavy and cryptographic workloads.

In passmark_random_string_sorting, the 8700F scores 45425 against 34801, a 30.5% lead. Passmark_physics shows a 1553 vs. 1210 result, a 28.3% advantage. The multithread test gives 30893 vs. 25889, a 19.3% difference. Extended instructions show 28474 vs. 24193, a 17.7% margin. Data compression results are 378160 vs. 327891, a 15.3% lead. Integer math scores 100371 vs. 87940, a 14.1% difference, and floating point math scores 62629 vs. 55799, a 12.2% margin.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins the two single-thread tests. In passmark_single_thread, it scores 4029 against 3872, a 3.9% advantage. The same result appears in passmark_singlethread, confirming consistency in single-core performance. This is a narrow but clear win for the P164 in single-threaded responsiveness.

The overall benchmark picture shows that the 8700F is significantly stronger in multi-threaded workloads, while the P164 has a small but consistent edge in single-thread performance. The P164's higher average benchmark score (52901 vs. 30746) is influenced by its different benchmark set and its higher percentile rank, but the head-to-head tests reveal that the 8700F holds the advantage in the majority of measured tasks.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is the better choice for users who prioritize multi-threaded performance. It wins 9 of the 11 head-to-head benchmarks, with leads ranging from 12.2% to 38% across encryption, compression, physics, sorting, and math workloads. Its 65-watt TDP and unlocked multiplier make it suitable for desktop systems where power and overclocking flexibility are available. The 8700F also has a larger L3 cache (16 MB vs. 8 MB), which contributes to its strength in data-heavy parallel tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the better choice for single-thread performance and power-constrained scenarios. It wins both single-thread tests by 3.9%, and its 28-watt TDP is less than half that of the 8700F. The P164 also supports ECC memory and includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU, making it a more complete package for mobile or embedded systems where discrete graphics are not an option. Its higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s) and support for LPDDR5X further suit low-power, integrated designs.

The P164's newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture explains its single-thread advantage despite the lower base clock. However, the 8700F's significantly higher base clock (4.10 GHz vs. 2.00 GHz) and larger L3 cache allow it to pull ahead in nearly every multi-threaded test. The recorded data shows that the 8700F is the performance leader in overall throughput, while the P164 delivers efficiency and single-core speed in a compact, embedded form factor.