AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Intel Core 5 213PTE both offer 8 cores and 16 threads, but the recorded benchmark data shows two processors with very different performance profiles. The AMD part holds an average benchmark score of 43689, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel part has an average score of 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The head-to-head results show the Intel processor winning 8 of the 11 compared tests, while the AMD processor wins only 3. The Intel Core 5 213PTE also carries a launch MSRP of $221. These figures frame a comparison where the Intel part generally leads in raw throughput, while the AMD part shows specific strengths in data processing and instruction-heavy workloads.

The Verdict

The performance data splits the two processors clearly by workload type. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the stronger choice for multi-threaded and math-intensive tasks. Its passmark multithread score of 25590 beats the AMD Ryzen 7 170’s 20760, a gap of 18.9 percent. The Intel part also wins in floating point math, integer math, physics, prime number finding, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. For users running simulations, rendering, encryption workloads, or any application that relies on heavy arithmetic, the Intel processor is the better fit based on the recorded numbers.

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins in data compression, data encryption, and extended instructions. Its data compression score of 265920 edges out the Intel part’s 261083, and its encryption score of 16078 beats the Intel part’s 14413 by 11.6 percent. The extended instructions score of 18107 versus 16146 gives AMD a 12.1 percent advantage. These wins suggest the AMD processor handles compression and cryptographic tasks with greater efficiency.

The average scores also favor AMD overall, but the gap is not large. The AMD part averages 43689 versus the Intel part’s 32924, a difference of about 32.7 percent. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 with an average score of 43704, the AMD Ryzen 7 260 at 43717, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 at 43431. The Intel part sits close to the Intel Core i7-12700 at 32942 and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079. The Intel part’s lower average score reflects its weaker results in the AMD-favored tests, but its wins in the majority of head-to-head comparisons make it the more versatile processor for general computing.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE dominates in compute-heavy scenarios. Its passmark physics score of 2199 is more than double the AMD part’s 890, a difference of 59.5 percent. This points to strong performance in physical simulations and similar workloads. The floating point math score of 71722 versus 44979 gives Intel a 37.3 percent lead, which indicates better handling of scientific calculations, 3D rendering, and audio processing. The integer math score of 93109 versus 79738 shows a 14.4 percent advantage for Intel, relevant for general application logic and database operations.

Single-thread performance is also firmly with Intel. The passmark single-thread score of 3718 versus 3128 represents a 15.9 percent lead. This matters for legacy applications, spreadsheet work, and any software that does not scale across cores. The prime number finding score of 157 versus 49 is a massive 68.8 percent gap in Intel’s favor, a strong indicator for cryptography and number-theory workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins are narrower but consistent. Its data compression score of 265920 is only 1.9 percent above the Intel part’s 261083, yet it remains a clear win. The encryption score advantage of 11.6 percent is more substantial, and the extended instructions lead of 12.1 percent shows AMD handles SIMD and specialized instruction sets better. These wins suggest the AMD processor suits archive management, secure data transfer, and code that uses vector extensions.

The Intel part also wins in random string sorting with a score of 30106 versus 27804, a 7.6 percent gap. This points to better performance in sorting algorithms and text processing.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing nodes and design families. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry. The AMD part is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, and it belongs to the Ryzen 7 generation. The Intel part uses the Bartlett Lake codename from the Core 5 generation.

The cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Intel part help explain its advantage in cache-sensitive workloads like prime number finding and floating point math.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both have a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part includes a Radeon 680M, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor is marked for the mobile segment and uses an AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor is a desktop part using Intel Socket 1700.

The PCIe capabilities are distinct. The AMD part offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe generation on the Intel part provides higher bandwidth for compatible devices.

The clock speeds also differ. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The higher boost clock on the Intel part aligns with its single-thread performance lead.

The thermal design power differs. The AMD part is rated at 35 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 45 watts. The lower TDP of the AMD part suggests it generates less heat and may suit thinner systems, despite being listed for mobile use.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has an average benchmark score of 43689, which is higher than the Intel Core 5 213PTE’s 32924. The AMD part also places in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part places in the 83rd.

Q: How large is the Intel part’s lead in multi-thread performance?

The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 25590 in the passmark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 20760. This gives Intel an 18.9 percent advantage.

Q: In which tests does the AMD processor win?

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins in data compression with a score of 265920, in data encryption with 16078, and in extended instructions with 18107. All three are head-to-head wins against the Intel part.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread scores?

The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 3718 in the passmark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 3128. The Intel part leads by 15.9 percent.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 170 and the Intel Core 5 213PTE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a boost clock of 4.75 GHz.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest win for the AMD Ryzen 7 170 comes in the passmark extended instructions test. The AMD score of 18107 beats the Intel score of 16146, a delta of 12.1 percent. This test measures the processor’s handling of specialized instruction sets, and the AMD part shows clear superiority.

The passmark data encryption test shows a similar pattern. The AMD score of 16078 is 11.6 percent above the Intel score of 14413. This indicates the AMD processor encrypts and decrypts data faster, which is relevant for secure storage and network traffic.

The passmark data compression test is the closest AMD win. The AMD score of 265920 is just 1.9 percent above the Intel score of 261083. While the margin is thin, the AMD part still takes the win in this workload.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE dominates the remaining tests. The passmark find prime numbers test shows the largest gap. The Intel score of 157 is 68.8 percent higher than the AMD score of 49. This is an extreme difference and suggests the Intel processor executes certain algorithmic loops much faster.

The passmark physics test gives Intel a 59.5 percent lead. The Intel score of 2199 versus the AMD score of 890 indicates the Intel part handles physics calculations with far greater speed. This has implications for game physics and engineering simulations.

The passmark floating point math test shows a 37.3 percent Intel advantage. The Intel score of 71722 versus 44979 confirms the Intel part processes decimal arithmetic more efficiently, which benefits scientific computing and 3D rendering.

The passmark multithread test gives Intel an 18.9 percent lead with a score of 25590 versus 20760. This is a broad measure of parallel performance and shows the Intel part handles multi-threaded applications better overall.

The passmark single-thread test gives Intel a 15.9 percent lead with 3718 versus 3128. This affects responsiveness in daily tasks and performance in lightly threaded software.

The passmark integer math test shows a 14.4 percent Intel advantage. The Intel score of 93109 versus 79738 indicates faster general arithmetic operations.

The passmark random string sorting test shows a 7.6 percent Intel lead. The Intel score of 30106 versus 27804 suggests the Intel part sorts data faster, which matters for database operations and text processing.

The total head-to-head count stands at 8 wins for the Intel part and 3 wins for the AMD part. The Intel wins are generally larger in magnitude, while the AMD wins include one narrow margin in data compression.

The AMD part’s average score of 43689 remains higher despite losing most head-to-head tests. This is because the AMD part’s wins in data compression, encryption, and extended instructions contribute to its overall average, and its lower scores in math and physics tests are offset by its strong showings elsewhere. The Intel part’s average of 32924 is dragged down by its lower scores in the AMD-favored tests, even though it wins more individual comparisons.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and Intel Core 5 213PTE differ across several key specifications. The AMD part uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD architecture is Zen 3+ with the codename Rembrandt-R, while the Intel part uses the Bartlett Lake codename.

The cache configuration differs. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The base clocks differ. The AMD part runs at 3.20 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 2.10 GHz. The boost clocks also differ, with the AMD part at 4.75 GHz and the Intel part at 5.20 GHz.

The thermal design power differs, with the AMD part rated at 35 watts and the Intel part rated at 45 watts. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses an Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and both support ECC memory.

The PCIe configuration differs. The AMD part offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part includes a Radeon 680M, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730.

The market segment differs. The AMD part is listed as Mobile, while the Intel part is listed as Desktop. The release dates also differ, with the AMD part released on 2025-09-30 and the Intel part released on 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are 100-000000989 for AMD and SA4QM for Intel.