AMD Ryzen 7 170 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison scenario. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a complete set of PassMark benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This absence of data for the Intel part means a direct head-to-head score comparison is not possible from the provided measurements. The database shows zero wins for each processor in head-to-head testing, reflecting this data gap.

Focusing solely on the AMD Ryzen 7 170’s recorded performance, the data reveals a processor that is well above average. Its percentileVsAllCpus score of 88 indicates it outperforms 88 percent of all CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score of 43,689 places it in a competitive tier. Its nearest rivals are all AMD parts, with the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scoring 43,704 (a 0 percent delta), the Ryzen 7 260 scoring 43,717 (-0.1 percent delta), the Ryzen AI 9 465 scoring 43,431 (0.6 percent delta), and the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scoring 43,326 (0.8 percent delta). These margins are exceptionally tight, all within roughly one percent of each other.

Looking at the individual PassMark subtests for the Ryzen 7 170, the strongest result is in data compression with a score of 265,920. The integer math test delivers 79,738, while floating point math scores 44,979. The multi-thread score of 20,760 and the single-thread score of 3,128 provide the core throughput figures. Data encryption records 16,078, extended instructions score 18,107, and random string sorting hits 27,804. The physics test scores 890, and the find prime numbers test records 49. These figures establish the Ryzen 7 170’s performance profile in isolation, but without Intel counterpart scores, the cross-manufacturer analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct benchmark deltas.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, specifically the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 210 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 215 mm². The process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a smaller 6 nm node compared to Intel’s 10 nm node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

Core and thread counts differ notably. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the AMD part a 2-core and 4-thread advantage. Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Intel part has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches and a larger L3 pool, the AMD part compensates with additional cores.

Clock speeds tell another story. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz and a significantly higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part’s 450 MHz boost advantage suggests a potential single-thread performance edge, though no benchmark data confirms this. Power consumption differs dramatically. The AMD part has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD processor uses nearly half the power envelope of the Intel competitor.

Memory support presents a clear split. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. This means the Intel part offers greater memory flexibility, while the AMD part has a confirmed bandwidth specification. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core i5-14501E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers the newer PCIe generation, which provides higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD part provides more total lanes. Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD processor includes a Radeon 680M, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part.

The market segments and sockets reinforce the different design targets. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 is a mobile segment processor using AMD Socket FP7, released on 2025-09-30. The Intel Core i5-14501E is a desktop segment processor using Intel Socket 1700, released on 2024-06-30. The AMD part’s lower TDP and mobile socket indicate a power-conscious design, while the Intel part’s desktop socket and higher TDP suggest a performance-oriented desktop role.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe technology?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark scores for both processors?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 has a full set of PassMark scores with an average benchmark score of 43,689. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 170 | Intel Core i5-14501E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | None recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000989 | Q49HSRNJM |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 170 wins on core and thread count. With 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, it provides more parallel processing capacity. This advantage is meaningful for workloads that scale with thread count, such as multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and data processing. Its recorded benchmark performance confirms solid multi-thread capability, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 20,760. The AMD part also wins decisively on power efficiency, with a 35 watt TDP versus the Intel part’s 65 watts. For sustained workloads in power-constrained environments, the AMD processor delivers more cores within a lower power envelope.

The AMD part also wins on PCIe lane count, offering 20 Gen 4 lanes versus the Intel part’s 16 Gen 5 lanes. While the Intel part uses a newer PCIe generation, the AMD part provides more total lanes for expansion. The AMD processor’s confirmed memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s gives it a measurable advantage in memory throughput, though the Intel part’s memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The AMD part also has the newer release date, coming out on 2025-09-30 versus 2024-06-30 for the Intel part.

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins on clock speed. Its base clock of 3.30 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz both exceed the AMD part’s 3.20 GHz base and 4.75 GHz boost. The 450 MHz boost advantage suggests better single-thread responsiveness, which typically benefits lightly threaded applications such as gaming and everyday desktop tasks. The Intel part also offers larger caches at every level: 80 KB versus 64 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB versus 512 KB L2 per core, and 24 MB versus 16 MB L3 shared. Larger caches can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The Intel part wins on memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports DDR5 only. This allows system builders to use more affordable or existing DDR4 memory. The Intel part also uses the newer PCIe Gen 5 standard, which offers higher per-lane bandwidth for compatible devices. The Intel part’s desktop market segment indicates it is designed for traditional desktop systems, while the AMD part’s mobile segment targets portable or compact form factors.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of roles. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 is the choice for multi-threaded, power-sensitive workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 35 watt TDP, make it suitable for environments where power efficiency and parallel throughput matter most. Its recorded average benchmark score of 43,689 and 88th percentile ranking confirm strong overall performance. The processor sits within one percent of its nearest rivals, all AMD parts, indicating it is well positioned within its own ecosystem.

The Intel Core i5-14501E is the choice for single-thread performance and memory flexibility. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock and larger cache hierarchy give it a theoretical edge in latency-sensitive and lightly threaded tasks. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory broadens its compatibility with existing systems. The desktop socket and 65 watt TDP indicate it is built for conventional desktop builds where power draw is less constrained.

The database lacks direct benchmark comparison data between the two, so performance claims must be inferred from specifications. The AMD part’s higher core count and lower power draw point to efficiency-focused computing. The Intel part’s higher clocks and newer PCIe generation point to raw speed and modern connectivity. Each processor wins in different domains, and the choice depends on whether the workload favors parallel efficiency or single-thread speed. The recorded data confirms the AMD part’s performance standing, while the Intel part’s lack of recorded benchmarks leaves its measured performance unverified in this database.