AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs Intel Core i5-14500HX Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D
Core i5-14500HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs Intel Core i5-14500HX
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the Intel Core i5-14500HX occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their benchmark results reveal a surprisingly competitive overlap. The data shows the Intel chip secures a decisive 8 to 3 win count in direct head-to-head tests, but the AMD processor counters with massive advantages in specific workloads that point to entirely different use-case strengths.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most striking result in the database is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D's performance in the prime number search test. It scores 221 against Intel's 130, a 70% advantage that is by far the largest delta between the two processors. This is a specialized compute pattern, but the margin is so wide it signals a fundamental efficiency difference in that instruction flow.
The AMD chip also dominates the physics test, scoring 2779 versus 1911, a 45.4% lead. This workload typically scales with cache access and memory latency, where the AMD part's architecture shows clear strength. In extended instructions, the AMD processor wins by a narrower 2.2% margin, scoring 20455 against 20019, which keeps it competitive in that segment.
Every other recorded benchmark favors the Intel Core i5-14500HX. The largest Intel win is in floating point math, where it scores 69442 against 43594, a 37.2% advantage. Integer math follows with a 26% lead, as Intel scores 95584 versus 70774. Data compression shows Intel ahead by 18.6%, scoring 333851 against 271649. Data encryption is close behind at a 19% delta, with Intel at 19502 and AMD at 15797.
The multithread score, a broad indicator of overall throughput, goes to Intel by 12.1%, with 28508 versus 25047. Random string sorting favors Intel by 8.9% (36219 vs 32999), and single thread performance goes to Intel by 3.7%, with 3629 against 3494.
The average benchmark score confirms the overall picture: the Intel part records 35094, while the AMD part records 44573. This apparent contradiction, where the AMD average is higher despite losing most head-to-head tests, reflects the different test suites recorded for each processor. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX sits at the 84th percentile.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear split based on workload type. The Intel Core i5-14500HX is the stronger general-purpose processor, delivering higher scores in eight of eleven direct comparisons, including the important multithread and single thread metrics. It leads in floating point math by 37.2% and integer math by 26%, which makes it the better choice for numerically intensive tasks.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the specialist. Its 70% lead in prime number finding and 45.4% lead in physics indicate a processor that excels in latency-sensitive or cache-dependent workloads. Its 2.2% win in extended instructions adds a third category where it holds an edge.
For users running physics simulations, prime number computations, or extended instruction sets, the AMD part is the clear winner from the recorded data. For everything else, particularly floating point, integer, and data compression workloads, the Intel part delivers higher scores. The Intel chip's 14 cores and 20 threads provide a structural advantage in parallel throughput, which shows up in the 12.1% multithread lead.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different foundries and use different process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses a 10 nm process from Intel, with a 257 mm² die size and no transistor count recorded in the database.
The AMD part is built on the Raphael codename, part of the Zen 4 generation, while the Intel part uses the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh generation. The AMD processor is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1964.
Cache architecture differs substantially. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 96 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The AMD part's 96 MB L3 is four times larger, which explains its wins in cache-sensitive tests like prime number finding and physics.
The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory. The AMD part provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part provides 16 Gen 5 lanes.
Specification Differences
The core and thread counts differ sharply. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. Clock speeds also differ: the AMD part runs at a 4.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost, while the Intel part runs at 2.60 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost.
The TDP figures are close but not identical: AMD lists 65 W, Intel lists 55 W. The AMD processor has a launch MSRP of $269; no launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel part. The AMD multiplier is locked, while the Intel multiplier is unlocked.
Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon Graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor's part number is 100-000001904, and the Intel part number is SRMXJ. The AMD release date is recorded as 2025-11-11, while the Intel release date is 2024-01-07.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a shared 96 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14500HX has a shared 24 MB L3 cache.
Q: How large is the performance gap in the multithread test?
A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 28508 in the passmark multithread test, which is 12.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 25047.
Q: Which processor wins the prime number search test?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 221 in the passmark find prime numbers test, a 70% advantage over the Intel Core i5-14500HX's 130.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the Intel Core i5-14500HX support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D wins in three recorded tests: prime number finding with a 70% lead, physics with a 45.4% lead, and extended instructions with a 2.2% lead. These results point to workloads that benefit from large cache capacity and efficient memory access patterns. The 96 MB L3 cache is the likely driver of these wins, making the AMD part preferable for physics calculations, prime number computations, and extended instruction set workloads.
The Intel Core i5-14500HX wins in eight recorded tests: floating point math by 37.2%, integer math by 26%, data encryption by 19%, data compression by 18.6%, multithread by 12.1%, random string sorting by 8.9%, and single thread by 3.7%. These wins cover the broad categories of general computing, numerical processing, and data handling. The higher core count of 14 versus 6 gives the Intel part a structural edge in parallel workloads, while its higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus 4.50 GHz supports its single thread advantage.
The overall percentile ranking also differs, with the AMD part at the 89th percentile and the Intel part at the 84th percentile. The AMD processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at a 0.2% delta and the Intel Core i9-13950HX at a 0.5% delta. The Intel processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900HX at a 0.3% delta and the Intel Core i7-13800H at a 0.3% delta. These rival relationships place each processor in a different competitive tier, with the AMD part ranking slightly higher overall despite losing most direct comparisons.