AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs Intel Core 5 120HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the Intel Core 5 120HL. The Intel Core 5 120HL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a full suite of PassMark test results.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D delivers an average benchmark score of 44,573, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (average score 44,466, which is 0.2% behind the AMD part) and the Intel Core i9-13950HX (average score 44,342, 0.5% behind). The AMD chip sits 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (average score 44,309) and trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7% (average score 44,889).

Because the Intel Core 5 120HL has no benchmark entries, the comparison is limited to architectural and specification differences. The data shows that the AMD part has a substantial performance profile across multiple workloads. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3,494, and its multithread score is 25,047. The floating-point math score is 43,594, while integer math reaches 70,774. Data compression scores 271,649, and data encryption scores 15,797. Extended instructions produce 20,455, and random string sorting reaches 32,999. Physics tests score 2,779, and prime number finding scores 221.

The Intel Core 5 120HL shows no recorded measurements in any of these categories, so no direct win or loss can be assigned. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the only one of the two with quantifiable benchmark results in the database.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, the benchmark suite demonstrates strengths across several workload types. The integer math score of 70,774 indicates solid general-purpose computational performance. The floating-point math score of 43,594 suggests capable scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression at 271,649 points toward strong file archiving and database-style operations. The multithread score of 25,047 positions it well for heavily threaded applications, and the single-thread score of 3,494 shows competitive responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks.

The Intel Core 5 120HL has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. It cannot be assigned wins in any workload category based on measured data. Its specifications do indicate a different design intent: 12 cores and 16 threads, which is more cores than the AMD part, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether that translates into real-world advantages.

The AMD part also shows a higher base clock (4.00 GHz versus 2.60 GHz) and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz compared to the Intel part's 4.70 GHz. The AMD part has a 65 W TDP, while the Intel part has a 45 W TDP. These figures suggest the Intel chip targets lower sustained power draw, but the AMD chip shows higher base frequency operation.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses the Raphael codename, built on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The architecture is Zen 4, part of the Ryzen 5 generation. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The large L3 cache is the defining feature of this X3D part, providing a significant amount of on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

The Intel Core 5 120HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry. It is based on Raptor Lake architecture, part of the Core 5 generation. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a smaller shared L3 cache but more L1 and L2 per core compared to the AMD part.

Memory support differs significantly. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It supports ECC memory. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure. It does not support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This is a substantial difference in both generation and lane count, affecting potential expansion and GPU bandwidth.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD part includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel part includes Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Both parts have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports unlocked overclocking.

The AMD part launched on 2025-11-11 with a launch MSRP of $269. The Intel part launched on 2024-04-07 with a launch MSRP of $279.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 120HL has 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which CPU has the larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 120HL has 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both CPUs support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5. The AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 120HL has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each CPU?

A: The AMD part uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 120HL does not.

Q: What is the TDP of each CPU?

A: The AMD part has a TDP of 65 W. The Intel part has a TDP of 45 W.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in several key specifications:

• Cores: AMD 6, Intel 12
• Threads: AMD 12, Intel 16
• Base clock: AMD 4.00 GHz, Intel 2.60 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD 4.50 GHz, Intel 4.70 GHz
• TDP: AMD 65 W, Intel 45 W
• Socket: AMD Socket AM5, Intel Socket 1700
• Process node: AMD 5 nm (TSMC), Intel 10 nm (Intel)
• Transistor count: AMD 11,270 million, Intel not recorded
• Die size: AMD 71 mm², Intel not recorded
• L1 cache (per core): AMD 64 KB, Intel 80 KB
• L2 cache (per core): AMD 1 MB, Intel 2 MB
• L3 cache (shared): AMD 96 MB, Intel 18 MB
• Memory support: AMD DDR5 only, Intel DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 83.2 GB/s, Intel not recorded
• ECC memory: AMD yes, Intel no
• PCIe: AMD Gen 5, 24 lanes (CPU only), Intel Gen 4, 8 lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon Graphics, Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
• Release date: AMD 2025-11-11, Intel 2024-04-07
• Launch MSRP: AMD $269, Intel $279
• Part number: AMD 100-000001904, Intel SRPFR

The Verdict

The database contains complete benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and no benchmark data for the Intel Core 5 120HL. This means the AMD part is the only one of the two with measured performance results. Its average benchmark score of 44,573 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals within a narrow 0.2% to 0.7% range. The Intel part sits in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, which indicates no recorded measurements.

For workloads that depend on large L3 cache, the AMD part with 96 MB of shared L3 is the clear choice from the data. The Intel part's 18 MB is a fraction of that. For applications that need more physical cores, the Intel part offers 12 cores versus 6, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether that advantage materializes in practice.

The AMD part runs on a newer 5 nm process, supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, supports ECC memory, and has a higher base clock. The Intel part runs on a 10 nm process, supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, has a higher boost clock, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

The Intel part has a lower TDP of 45 W versus 65 W, which indicates lower power draw. It also launched earlier with a slightly higher MSRP of $279 versus $269.

For a builder prioritizing measured performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the only option with data to support a decision. For a builder prioritizing core count, dual memory support, or lower TDP, the Intel Core 5 120HL offers those specifications, though without benchmark validation in the database.