AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a substantial performance gap between these two processors, with the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H holding a clear advantage across every measurable workload. The database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel part, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no recorded benchmark scores, resulting in zero wins for the AMD processor in the head-to-head comparison.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,991, which places it in the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its single-core result of 3,387 in the same test confirms that the advantage is not limited to multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R20, the Intel part scores 10,076 multi-core and 1,422 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2,418 multi-core and 341 single-core. These numbers indicate consistent scaling across different benchmark versions.

PassMark results reinforce the same pattern. The Intel processor records 28,545 in the multi-thread test and 4,013 in the single-thread test. Data compression reaches 280,340, while data encryption hits 21,291. Extended instructions score 24,542, and the processor finds prime numbers at a rate of 299. Floating point math completes at 82,415, and integer math at 62,070. Random string sorting finishes at 34,402, and the physics test records 2,682.

The Intel part's average benchmark score of 34,485 places it in close competition with several established desktop and mobile processors. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700HX, averages 34,554, putting the Core Ultra 5 336H just 0.2% behind. The Intel Core i5-13450HX averages 34,333, which the Core Ultra 5 336H leads by 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X averages 34,260, a 0.7% deficit, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 averages 34,222, a 0.8% edge for the Intel part. These tight margins show that the Core Ultra 5 336H performs at a level comparable to established mid-range and upper-mid-range processors, despite being a mobile-class chip.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE uses the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture with the same Panther Lake codename, fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process. The database lists no transistor count or die size for the Intel part.

Core configurations differ sharply. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, relying on simultaneous multithreading to reach its thread count. The Intel processor has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning it uses a fully physical core layout with no hyperthreading. This structural difference explains much of the multi-core performance gap: the Intel part has 10 additional physical cores.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations suggest a design optimized for feeding more cores, while the L3 difference is modest at 2 MB.

Clock speeds show a different tradeoff. The AMD chip runs a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 4.40 GHz. The Intel chip runs a lower base clock of 1.90 GHz but boosts higher to 4.60 GHz. The higher boost clock on the Intel part contributes to its single-core advantage, while the lower base clock likely reflects power management priorities in a mobile form factor.

Memory support and platform connectivity differ completely. The AMD processor uses DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, more than double the AMD figure. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD chip provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket AM4, a desktop socket, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 2540, a ball-grid array for mobile systems.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE carries Radeon Vega 7 graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H carries Intel Xe3 Graphics. Neither processor supports ECC memory. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel chip is locked.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more physical cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does the Intel processor's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H averages 34,485. It sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-13700HX, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13450HX, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE supports DDR4 memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE boosts to 4.40 GHz.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is built on a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H have an Active production status.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE | Intel Core Ultra 5 336H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.40 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 25 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Panther Lake |

| Process node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 18 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 12 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Vega 7 | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release date | 2025-02-23 | 2026-01-04 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins every recorded benchmark category. Its 16 physical cores drive a 23,991 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, a 10,076 Cinebench R20 multi-core score, and a 2,418 Cinebench R15 multi-core score. PassMark multi-thread performance reaches 28,545, and the data compression score of 280,340 indicates strong throughput in that workload. The single-core results also favor Intel: 3,387 in Cinebench R23, 1,422 in Cinebench R20, 341 in Cinebench R15, and 4,013 in PassMark single-thread.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has no recorded benchmarks in the database, so a direct score comparison is impossible. However, its specifications point to different strengths. The 35 W TDP, the unlocked multiplier, and the desktop AM4 socket suggest a configurable desktop part. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.40 GHz boost clock and DDR4 support positions it as a lower-power desktop option. The AMD chip also uses Gen 3 PCIe with 16 lanes, which may suit platforms with older expansion cards or storage.

The Intel processor's 25 W TDP, despite its 16 cores, indicates an efficiency-oriented mobile design. The lower base clock of 1.90 GHz paired with the higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz allows the chip to scale up when needed while idling at low power. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5/LPDDR5X support give it a clear bandwidth advantage for memory-intensive workloads.

The Verdict

The benchmark data unequivocally favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H. Its 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 34,485, places it in direct competition with processors like the Intel Core i7-13700HX and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. The Intel part leads the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE in every measurable category, and the AMD chip has no recorded scores to counterbalance the comparison.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H suits workloads that benefit from many physical cores and high memory bandwidth. The 16-core layout, 18 MB of L3 cache, and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a strong choice for multi-threaded rendering, data compression, and encryption tasks. The 3 nm process and 25 W TDP indicate that this performance arrives within a mobile power envelope, and the BGA 2540 socket confirms its intended use in laptops and compact systems.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE suits a different scenario. Its AM4 desktop socket, unlocked multiplier, and 35 W TDP point to a configurable desktop processor for systems where overclocking and platform compatibility matter more than raw core count. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.40 GHz boost clock can handle single-threaded and moderately threaded workloads, while the DDR4 support aligns with existing AM4 motherboards. The 7 nm process and 180 mm² die size show a mature design, but the absence of benchmark data leaves its practical performance unquantified in the database.

Users who prioritize maximum throughput, higher memory bandwidth, and a newer process node should select the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H. Users who need a desktop processor with an unlocked multiplier, AM4 socket compatibility, and lower power consumption should consider the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE, though they should expect a significant multi-core deficit based on the core count and architecture differences recorded in the data.