AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data shows a complete sweep for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. Across every single test in the database, the Intel part finishes ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE. That said, the AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores in the current database, so its wins cannot be quantified. The Intel chip's percentile ranking of 82 versus the AMD's 50 percentile places them in different performance tiers entirely.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T demonstrates its strength in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4348, combined with a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 3101, confirms strong per-core performance. The multi-thread results are equally dominant: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 21971, while PassMark multithread reaches 25358. The Intel processor also leads in specialized workloads like data compression (233998), floating point math (82751), and integer math (59543).

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE, with no benchmark entries in the database, cannot be attributed any specific wins. Its specifications suggest it would compete in the low-power desktop segment, but the recorded data does not support any performance claims for it.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from completely different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process node, packing 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache layout includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3 cache.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process node, with 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die. It offers 10 cores and 10 threads, running at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosting to 4.90 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is notably different: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3.

Memory support diverges sharply. The AMD part uses DDR4 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part uses DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, exactly double the AMD's throughput. This memory bandwidth gap directly impacts memory-sensitive workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel processor offers Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. This makes the Intel part more suitable for high-bandwidth expansion cards and storage devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE uses Radeon Vega 7, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU. The Intel part also carries a higher TDP of 65 watts versus 35 watts for the AMD, reflecting its higher performance ceiling and more demanding power requirements.

The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel processor is locked. This means the AMD part can be overclocked by adjusting the multiplier, whereas the Intel part cannot. The AMD uses socket AM4, while the Intel uses socket 1851.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. However, the Intel processor has a full set of recorded benchmarks that establish its performance baseline. The AMD processor has no recorded scores, so no delta percentages can be calculated between the two.

Looking at the Intel part's nearest rivals provides context for its performance level. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores an average benchmark of 30468, which places it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11980HK (avg score 30422), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (avg score 30390), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (avg score 30364). It trails the Intel Core i5-13600H (avg score 30548) by 0.3%.

The Intel's multi-core performance is particularly strong. Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 9227, while Cinebench R15 multi-core hits 2214. The PassMark multithread score of 25358 reinforces this. Single-core results are equally solid: Cinebench R23 single-core at 3101, Cinebench R20 single-core at 1302, and Cinebench R15 single-core at 312.

Specialized workloads show varied results. PassMark data compression scores 233998, data encryption hits 18289, and extended instructions reaches 20083. Prime number finding scores 284, random string sorting hits 28774, and physics processing reaches 2053. Floating point math scores 82751, while integer math scores 59543.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, would theoretically compete in multi-threaded tasks, but without benchmark data, no quantitative comparison is possible. Its 35 watt TDP and DDR4 support position it as a lower-power offering, but the database cannot confirm any performance advantage.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the clear choice for users who need confirmed performance. Its benchmark scores are comprehensive and place it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE, with no benchmark scores in the database, cannot be recommended for any performance-driven use case.

The Intel processor's 10 cores and 10 threads provide a solid foundation for multi-threaded applications, and its 4.90 GHz boost clock supports responsive single-thread performance. The DDR5 memory support and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for memory-intensive workloads. The Gen 5 PCIe lanes offer future-proofing for high-speed storage and graphics.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has its own merits based on specifications. Its 35 watt TDP makes it a low-power option, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking potential. The Zen 3 architecture and 7 nm process node are proven technologies. However, without benchmark data, any performance claims remain speculative.

For users who prioritize verified performance and modern platform features, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T delivers. For users who need a low-power desktop processor with overclocking capability and the flexibility of socket AM4, the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE may still be worth considering, but the database provides no evidence of its performance capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has more physical cores, but the AMD part has more threads due to simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE boosts to 4.40 GHz. The Intel part has a 0.50 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T supports DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part offers double the memory bandwidth.

Q: How do their TDP ratings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part consumes significantly less power.

Q: Can either processor be overclocked?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has a locked multiplier and cannot be overclocked.

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T's average benchmark score relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 on average. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13600H.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the AMD Ryzen 5 5605GE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T:

• Cores: 6 (AMD) vs 10 (Intel)
• Threads: 12 (AMD) vs 10 (Intel)
• Base Clock: 3.40 GHz (AMD) vs 2.50 GHz (Intel)
• Boost Clock: 4.40 GHz (AMD) vs 4.90 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 35 W (AMD) vs 65 W (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket AM4 (AMD) vs Intel Socket 1851 (Intel)
• Architecture: Zen 3 (AMD) vs Arrow Lake (Intel)
• Process Node: 7 nm (AMD) vs 3 nm (Intel)
• Transistors: 10,700 million (AMD) vs 17,800 million (Intel)
• Die Size: 180 mm² (AMD) vs 243 mm² (Intel)
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core (AMD) vs 192 KB per core (Intel)
• L2 Cache: 512 KB per core (AMD) vs 3 MB per core (Intel)
• L3 Cache: 16 MB (AMD) vs 20 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory Support: DDR4 (AMD) vs DDR5 (Intel)
• Memory Bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s (AMD) vs 102.4 GB/s (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 3, 16 Lanes (AMD) vs Gen 5, 20 Lanes (Intel)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon Vega 7 (AMD) vs Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU (Intel)
• Multiplier Unlocked: Yes (AMD) vs No (Intel)