AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 are two distinct mobile processors from the same manufacturer, but they target very different performance profiles. The Ryzen 5 150 is a 6-core, 12-thread chip based on the Zen 3+ architecture, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is an 8-core, 16-thread part built on the newer Zen 5 architecture. The recorded data shows that the Ryzen 5 150 has a complete set of benchmark scores, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark results, which shapes the analysis below. The Ryzen 5 150 holds a 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 sits at the 50th percentile based on its current database entry, though this second figure is not tied to any measured performance data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AI Max PRO 485 therefore offers two additional physical cores and four additional threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two chips?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a higher base clock of 3.60 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The AI Max PRO 485 runs faster in both states.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses quad-channel LPDDR5X memory and delivers a peak bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s, which is substantially higher.

Q: Which processor has a smaller die size?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a die size of 70.6 mm², while the Ryzen 5 150 has a die size of 210 mm². The AI Max PRO 485 is built on a 4 nm process, whereas the Ryzen 5 150 uses a 6 nm process from the same foundry, TSMC.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 5 150 does not support ECC memory. This is a clear functional difference between the two.

Q: What do the benchmark results show for the Ryzen 5 150?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 has an average benchmark score of 34881 across multiple tests. It scores 17492 in multithread performance, 3155 in single-thread performance, and 211289 in data compression, among other results. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying architecture. The Ryzen 5 150 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Halo. This generational gap is reflected in the manufacturing process: the Ryzen 5 150 is fabricated on a 6 nm node, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses a 4 nm node, both from TSMC. The smaller process node on the AI Max PRO 485 allows for a much smaller die size of 70.6 mm² compared to the 210 mm² die of the Ryzen 5 150.

Cache configurations also differ. The Ryzen 5 150 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a larger cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The AI Max PRO 485 doubles the L3 cache capacity and doubles the per-core L2 cache, which can benefit workloads that rely on frequent data reuse.

Memory support is another architectural split. The Ryzen 5 150 uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. This represents a 3.6x increase in peak memory bandwidth for the AI Max PRO 485, which is particularly relevant for memory-intensive tasks such as large data processing or integrated graphics workloads. The Ryzen 5 150 also has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, so the older chip offers more PCIe connectivity.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 5 150 includes a Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 includes a Radeon 8050S. The AI Max PRO 485 also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Ryzen 5 150. Both chips are unlocked in the sense that they are not multiplier-unlocked, meaning their clock multipliers are locked. The Ryzen 5 150 uses the AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses the AMD Socket FP11, so they are not socket-compatible.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not possible because the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win count for each processor is zero. As a result, the analysis must rely on the Ryzen 5 150's measured performance and the architectural differences between the two chips.

The Ryzen 5 150's benchmark data provides a baseline for what its architecture can achieve. In multithreaded workloads, it scores 17492 on the Passmark multithread test. Its single-thread score is 3155. The processor performs notably well in specific tasks: data compression yields a score of 211289, integer math scores 62151, floating point math scores 35118, and extended instructions score 14675. Other results include 13425 for data encryption, 22382 for random string sorting, 806 for physics, and 47 for finding prime numbers. These scores place the Ryzen 5 150 at the 84th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals to the Ryzen 5 150, based on average benchmark score, are Intel processors. The Intel Xeon 6349P has an average score of 34890, which is 0% different from the Ryzen 5 150's 34881. The Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 34962, a delta of -0.2%, meaning it is slightly faster. The Intel Core i7-13800H scores 34988, also -0.2% relative, and the Intel Core i9-12900HX scores 35003, again -0.3%. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Ryzen 5 150 performs within a narrow band of these Intel parts.

For the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, the lack of benchmark scores means its performance cannot be directly quantified against the Ryzen 5 150 or any other processor. The database lists its percentile as 50, but with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals, this figure does not reflect measured performance. The architectural advantages of the AI Max PRO 485, such as more cores, higher clocks, larger caches, and much higher memory bandwidth, suggest it would outperform the Ryzen 5 150 in most workloads, but no recorded data confirms this.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two processors are extensive and can be summarized across several key fields:

• Cores: 6 (Ryzen 5 150) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Threads: 12 (Ryzen 5 150) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Base Clock: 3.30 GHz (Ryzen 5 150) vs 3.60 GHz (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Boost Clock: 4.55 GHz (Ryzen 5 150) vs 5.00 GHz (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• TDP: 35 W (Ryzen 5 150) vs 55 W (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 (Ryzen 5 150) vs AMD Socket FP11 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Architecture: Zen 3+ (Ryzen 5 150) vs Zen 5 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Codename: Rembrandt-R (Ryzen 5 150) vs Gorgon Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Process Node: 6 nm (Ryzen 5 150) vs 4 nm (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Die Size: 210 mm² (Ryzen 5 150) vs 70.6 mm² (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core (Ryzen 5 150) vs 80 KB per core (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• L2 Cache: 512 KB per core (Ryzen 5 150) vs 1 MB per core (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• L3 Cache: 16 MB shared (Ryzen 5 150) vs 32 MB shared (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Memory Support: DDR5 (Ryzen 5 150) vs LPDDR5X (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Memory Bus: Dual-channel (Ryzen 5 150) vs Quad-channel (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s (Ryzen 5 150) vs 273.1 GB/s (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• ECC Memory: False (Ryzen 5 150) vs True (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes (Ryzen 5 150) vs Gen 4, 16 Lanes (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 660M (Ryzen 5 150) vs Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Part Number: 100-000000990(FP7r2) (Ryzen 5 150) vs 100-000002144 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)
• Release Date: 2025-09-30 (Ryzen 5 150) vs 2026-05-19 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 485)

Both processors are from AMD, target the mobile market segment, are currently active in production, and have no launch MSRP recorded. Neither supports an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the available data, the Ryzen 5 150 has a clear edge in measured performance, as it is the only one of the two with benchmark scores. Its 84th percentile ranking and average score of 34881 place it in the upper tier of CPUs. The Ryzen 5 150 is also more power-efficient in terms of TDP, drawing 35 W compared to 55 W for the AI Max PRO 485. For systems where power consumption is a constraint, such as thinner laptops or passively cooled designs, the Ryzen 5 150 is the more suitable choice. Its lower TDP does not appear to hinder its measured performance, as its benchmark scores are competitive with the Intel parts listed as nearest rivals.

The Ryzen 5 150 also offers more PCIe lanes, with 20 Gen 4 lanes versus 16 on the AI Max PRO 485. This could benefit configurations with multiple storage devices or expansion cards. Its larger die size of 210 mm², while less efficient in terms of silicon area, may allow for more robust thermal distribution depending on the cooling solution.

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, despite having no benchmark data, presents a compelling case on paper for specific use cases. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide more parallel processing capacity than the 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5 150. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is 0.45 GHz higher than the Ryzen 5 150's 4.55 GHz, which could yield faster single-threaded performance, though this is not measured. The AI Max PRO 485 also has a significantly larger cache allocation, with 32 MB of L3 cache versus 16 MB, and a more capable memory subsystem with quad-channel LPDDR5X and 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory bandwidth advantage is substantial and could be decisive for workloads that are bandwidth-limited, such as certain scientific simulations, large in-memory databases, or integrated graphics rendering.

The AI Max PRO 485's support for ECC memory is another differentiator. For tasks where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or server-like workloads, ECC support is a functional advantage that the Ryzen 5 150 cannot offer. The AI Max PRO 485 also uses a newer architecture and a smaller 4 nm process, which typically brings efficiency improvements, though its higher TDP of 55 W suggests it is designed for higher performance envelopes.

In terms of use cases, the Ryzen 5 150 is better suited for mainstream mobile computing where power efficiency and proven performance matter. Its benchmark scores demonstrate solid multi-threaded and single-threaded capability, and its lower TDP makes it easier to integrate into compact systems. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, on the other hand, appears positioned for more demanding applications that can utilize its extra cores, higher clocks, larger caches, and massive memory bandwidth. The absence of benchmark data means these advantages are theoretical, but the architectural specifications support this interpretation. For workloads that require high memory throughput or ECC reliability, the AI Max PRO 485 is the only choice between the two.