AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 150

CORE STATE Rembrandt-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.55 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

CORE STATE Krackan Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
211,289
281,834
passmark_data_encryption
13,425
14,462
passmark_extended_instructions
14,675
19,955
passmark_find_prime_numbers
47
81
passmark_floating_point_math
35,118
51,639
passmark_integer_math
62,151
84,868
passmark_multithread
17,492
23,994
passmark_physics
806
1,318
passmark_random_string_sorting
22,382
31,071
passmark_single_thread
3,155
3,872
passmark_singlethread
3,155
3,872
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,336.5
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
247
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
14,278.5
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
1,954

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the AMD Ryzen 5 150 are both mobile processors from AMD, but they occupy very different positions in the product stack. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a newer, higher-tier part built on a more advanced process, while the Ryzen 5 150 is an older, more modest offering. The benchmark data shows a clear and consistent hierarchy between the two, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 winning every single recorded head-to-head test.

Where Each One Wins

The performance split between these two chips is not a matter of different strengths; it is a matter of overall capability. The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 winning all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with the AMD Ryzen 5 150 failing to take a single test. This means there is no workload category where the Ryzen 5 150 emerges as the better choice based on the database's measurements.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 demonstrates its dominance across every major compute category. In multi-threaded workloads, which typically represent content creation, rendering, and heavy productivity, the lead is substantial. The PassMark multi-thread test shows a 37.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. This pattern repeats in the floating-point math test, where the newer chip leads by 47%, and in integer math, where the margin is 36.6%. For users running parallel workloads that scale across many cores, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is clearly the superior option.

Single-threaded performance also favors the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, although by a smaller margin. The PassMark single-thread test shows a 22.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. This advantage is relevant for everyday responsiveness, browser use, and lightly-threaded applications. While the Ryzen 5 150 is not uncompetitive in this area, it still trails by a considerable margin. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 also wins in specialized instruction tests, such as extended instructions by 36% and data encryption by 7.7%. The only area where the Ryzen 5 150 comes relatively close is data encryption, but even there, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 maintains a clear lead.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and are built on distinct architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Krackan Point codename, and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses the older Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename.

The manufacturing process is a major divider. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Ryzen 5 150 uses a larger 6 nm process, also from TSMC. This process advantage contributes to the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's higher efficiency and clock speeds. The die size also differs, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 measuring 195 mm² and the Ryzen 5 150 measuring 210 mm². Despite having more cores, the newer chip is physically smaller, highlighting the density improvements of the 4 nm node.

Core and cache layouts are also fundamentally different. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The cache hierarchy reflects the architectural changes. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 8 MB of L3 cache. The Ryzen 5 150 has 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, but its L3 cache is larger at 16 MB shared. This means the Ryzen 5 150 has twice the total L3 cache, which can be beneficial for certain data-heavy workloads, but the benchmark results show the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's other advantages are more decisive.

Other feature differences include memory support. Both support DDR5, but the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 also supports LPDDR5X, while the Ryzen 5 150 only lists DDR5. The memory bandwidth is higher on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at 89.6 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s on the Ryzen 5 150. ECC memory support is present on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, but not on the Ryzen 5 150. The integrated graphics also differ, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 featuring the Radeon 860M and the Ryzen 5 150 featuring the Radeon 660M.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark results tell a story of consistent and often large performance gaps. The largest single win for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 81 compared to the Ryzen 5 150's 47, a 72.3% advantage. This test is highly sensitive to raw integer throughput and memory latency, and the newer architecture clearly excels here.

The PassMark physics test also shows a massive gap. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 1318, while the Ryzen 5 150 scores 806, a lead of 63.5%. Physics simulations often rely heavily on multi-core scaling and floating-point performance, both of which favor the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. In floating-point math, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's score of 51639 dwarfs the Ryzen 5 150's 35118, a 47% margin. This is a critical result for scientific computing, engineering simulations, and any workload with heavy FPU usage.

Multi-threaded performance is another strong area for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. The PassMark multi-thread score is 23994 versus 17492 for the Ryzen 5 150, a 37.2% difference. The data compression test shows a 33.4% lead, with scores of 281834 and 211289 respectively. Random string sorting also favors the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 by 38.8%, with scores of 31071 and 22382. These results indicate that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is significantly better at handling parallel workloads and data manipulation tasks.

The margins are smaller but still clear in other areas. In data encryption, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 14462 versus 13425, a 7.7% lead. This is the narrowest gap recorded, suggesting that the security-related instruction sets are more comparable between the two. Single-thread performance shows a 22.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, with scores of 3872 and 3155. Extended instructions also favor the newer chip by 36%, with scores of 19955 and 14675.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal several key differences beyond raw performance. The most obvious is the core and thread count, with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 offering 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 150. The clock speeds also differ, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 having a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen 5 150 has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.55 GHz. This means the Ryzen 5 150 starts at a higher frequency, but the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 can reach higher peak speeds.

The TDP rating is another point of distinction. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is rated at 28 W, while the Ryzen 5 150 is rated at 35 W. Despite the lower TDP, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 delivers higher performance, showcasing the efficiency gains from the 4 nm process. The sockets are different as well, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 using AMD Socket FP8 and the Ryzen 5 150 using AMD Socket FP7.

PCIe support also varies. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Ryzen 5 150 offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes. This means the Ryzen 5 150 has more PCIe lanes available for expansion, which could be relevant for systems with multiple NVMe drives or discrete GPUs. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but the supported memory types differ. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Ryzen 5 150 only supports DDR5. The release dates are also different, with the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 launching on January 5, 2025, and the Ryzen 5 150 launching on September 30, 2025.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 23994 in the PassMark multi-thread test, which is 37.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 150's score of 17492.

Q: How does the single-thread performance compare?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 3872 in the PassMark single-thread test, beating the Ryzen 5 150's score of 3155 by 22.7%.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has a larger L3 cache at 16 MB shared, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Ryzen 5 150 has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 150 win any benchmarks in the database?

A: No, the recorded head-to-head benchmarks show the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 winning all 11 tests, with the Ryzen 5 150 taking zero wins.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 150
AI 7 PRO 350
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2 -39.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.55
5 +9.9%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2 -39.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.55
5 +9.9%
Multiplier
33
20 -39.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
8 MB
Power
TDP (W)
35
28 -20.0%
Configurable TDP
35-54 W
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 5
Codename
Rembrandt-R
Krackan Point
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Die Size
210 mm²
195 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
AMD Socket FP8
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
4 + 4
E-Core Frequency
—
2000 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 660M
Radeon 860M
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000000990(FP7r2)
100-000000713
Package
FP7r2
FP8
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 150 Details View Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Details