AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G and the Intel Core 5 213PE represent two distinct approaches to the desktop processor, and the benchmark data in the database shows a decisive performance gap between them. The Intel part secures a clean sweep of wins across every recorded head-to-head benchmark, but the nature of those victories varies significantly from single-threaded tasks to heavily parallel workloads. This analysis interprets those recorded scores, architectural differences, and specification gaps to provide a clear picture of where each processor stands.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database’s head-to-head results are unambiguous: the Intel Core 5 213PE wins all 11 recorded comparisons. The most lopsided victory comes in the passmark_find_prime_numbers test, where the Intel chip scores 114 against AMD’s 36, a delta of -68.4% for the Ryzen part. This test is highly sensitive to integer execution efficiency and cache latency, and the Intel processor’s lead here is substantial.

Another dominant result for Intel is in passmark_floating_point_math, with a score of 68587 versus 25245 for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G. That represents a 63.2% deficit for the AMD chip, indicating a massive advantage in FPU throughput. The passmark_physics test follows a similar pattern, where Intel scores 1624 against AMD’s 701, a 56.8% gap. These two results point to the Intel processor’s superior raw compute capability in both floating-point and simulation-style workloads.

The Intel Core 5 213PE also shows a commanding lead in integer throughput. In passmark_integer_math, it scores 92089 versus 45910, a 50.1% difference. The passmark_multithread test, which measures overall parallel performance, shows Intel at 26434 against AMD’s 14033, a 46.9% advantage. This aligns with the core count disparity: the Intel chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads.

The smallest margins are found in single-threaded performance. In the passmark_single_thread test, Intel scores 4060 against AMD’s 3096, a 23.7% lead. This is still a significant gap, but it is the closest the AMD processor comes to matching its rival. The data compression test shows Intel at 298804 versus 168041, a 43.8% difference, while random string sorting sees Intel at 32027 versus 18819, a 41.2% gap. Data encryption shows Intel at 15916 versus 10288, a 35.4% lead, and extended instructions show Intel at 19565 versus 11935, a 39% advantage.

The average benchmark score in the database reflects this overall trend. The Intel Core 5 213PE posts an average score of 35428, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G averages 27382, placing it in the 79th percentile. The Intel part’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35403, delta 0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35365, delta 0.2%). The AMD part’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700H (avg score 27355, delta 0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (avg score 27535, delta -0.6%). The data places the Intel chip in a higher performance tier entirely.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing and design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, and manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process by Intel’s own foundry. The process node difference is notable, with AMD’s 7 nm process theoretically offering better transistor density, but the Intel chip’s higher core count and clock speeds compensate.

The cache hierarchies are structurally different. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 8 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core and a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Intel part are likely a major factor in its strong performance in the find_prime_numbers and data_compression tests, which are cache-sensitive.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G supports DDR4 memory only, over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its recorded memory bandwidth is higher at 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part’s compatibility with faster memory standards gives it a platform-level advantage.

PCIe connectivity differs significantly. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe standard on the Intel platform allows for faster data transfer to compatible storage and expansion cards, which is a forward-looking advantage.

Both processors include integrated graphics. The AMD chip uses Radeon Vega 6 graphics, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. Both support ECC memory, which is a feature aimed at professional and reliability-focused builds. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not officially supported on either platform.

The transistor count and die size are only recorded for the AMD chip: 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. No such data exists for the Intel part in the database. The AMD chip is part of the 5000 series and uses the AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700. The release dates are also distinct, with the AMD chip released in September 2024 and the Intel chip released in March 2026.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 4060 in the passmark_single_thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 3096. The Intel chip leads by 23.7%.

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, exactly double the core count.

Q: What is the performance gap in multithreaded workloads?

A: In the passmark_multithread test, the Intel chip scores 26434 and the AMD chip scores 14033. This gives the Intel processor a 46.9% advantage in parallel performance.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G and the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory, as recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth rating?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel chip’s rating is higher.

Q: Which processor has a better overall percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE is in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is in the 79th percentile. The Intel chip ranks higher overall.

The Verdict

The data in the database is clear: the Intel Core 5 213PE is the superior performer across every measured benchmark. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, combined with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and larger cache, delivers a consistent and significant advantage over the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G. The Intel chip’s average benchmark score of 35428 places it in a performance class that includes the Intel Core i7-12700K and i7-12700KF, while the AMD chip’s average of 27382 aligns it with the Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Ryzen 7 5800.

For users whose workloads are heavily multithreaded, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the clear choice. Its 46.9% lead in multithreaded performance and 50.1% lead in integer math will translate directly into faster completion times. The Intel chip also demonstrates a strong edge in floating-point math, making it suitable for simulation and financial modeling tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G does not win any of the 11 head-to-head comparisons, but its smaller footprint in single-threaded performance (a 23.7% gap) suggests it is not a slouch. Its 65 W TDP matches the Intel chip’s, but its lower core count and smaller cache limit its potential. The AMD chip’s use of the AM4 socket and DDR4 memory may appeal to users with existing platforms, but the Intel chip offers DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5, which are more future-proof. The Intel Core 5 213PE is the recommended processor based on the recorded performance data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G | Intel Core 5 213PE |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.20 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Codename | Cezanne | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| Cache L2 | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| Cache L3 | 8 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Release Date | 2024-09-04 | 2026-03-08 |

| Part Number | 100-000001749 | SA4QG |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | $221 |