AMD Ryzen 3 5305G vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a substantial set of measurements. This means every head-to-head comparison is one-sided: the Intel part has results across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and several Passmark workloads, and the AMD part has none recorded in the database.

Starting with multi-threaded performance, the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 21,751 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, it scores 9,135, and in Cinebench R15 multi-core it scores 2,192. These are the only multi-core Cinebench figures available on this page, so the Intel part stands alone in those tests. The single-core results follow the same pattern: 3,070 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1,289 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 309 in Cinebench R15 single-core. With no AMD scores to compare, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the sole data point in every Cinebench test listed.

Passmark results for the Intel Core 5 213PTE show a mixed workload profile. The highest absolute score is in data compression at 261,083. Integer math reaches 93,109, floating point math reaches 71,722, and random string sorting reaches 30,106. Extended instructions score 16,146, data encryption scores 14,413, and the multithread rating is 25,590. The physics test scores 2,199, the single-thread rating is 3,718, and the find prime numbers test scores 157. Again, the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no recorded Passmark scores, so there is no direct comparison available in any of these workloads.

Because the AMD side has no benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a head-to-head delta. The Intel Core 5 213PTE holds an average benchmark score of 32,924, putting it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i7-12700 with an average score of 32,942 (a delta of -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H with 32,812 (a delta of 0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D with 33,079 (a delta of -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G with 33,089 (a delta of -0.5%). These deltas show the Core 5 213PTE sits within a tight band of roughly half a percent of several established desktop and mobile parts, neither clearly ahead nor behind them on average.

The Ryzen 3 5305G, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile with no nearest rivals listed. The data shows no measurable performance record for the AMD part, so any comparison of scores between the two CPUs is impossible. The practical interpretation is that the database contains complete performance data for the Intel Core 5 213PTE and none for the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the choice depends entirely on whether a user needs documented performance or is relying on specifications alone. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has all of the benchmark evidence: 17 scores across Cinebench and Passmark, an average benchmark score of 32,924, and an 83rd percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. For anyone evaluating measured performance, the Intel part is the only one with data to analyze.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE also aligns with rivals in the database. It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-12700, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, with deltas between -0.5% and 0.3%. That places it in the company of high-end desktop and mobile chips from both manufacturers. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no such comparisons recorded.

The specification sheet favors the Intel part in several ways. It has 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads for the AMD part. Its boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz versus 4.20 GHz, and its L3 cache is 24 MB shared versus 8 MB. Its memory bandwidth is rated at 76.8 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s, it supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and it includes ECC memory support. The AMD part is not unlocked, so the multiplier situation also differs.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G does hold some specification advantages. Its base clock of 4.00 GHz is higher than the Intel base clock of 2.10 GHz. It uses a 7 nm process node versus 10 nm, and it has a 65 W TDP versus 45 W. It also has a lower launch MSRP, though the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded at all, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part uses the AM4 socket, while the Intel part uses Socket 1700.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne, part of the 5000 series and the Ryzen 3 generation. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process node. The die size is recorded at 180 mm², and the transistor count is 10,700 million. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename in the Core 5 generation, with a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. No die size or transistor count is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. That is a substantially larger L3 pool on the Intel side, and the per-core L2 is four times larger. The Intel part also has more cores, 8 versus 4, and more threads, 16 versus 8.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G supports DDR4 only, with dual-channel memory and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it does support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics are present on both chips. The AMD part includes Radeon Vega 6, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730. Neither is benchmarked in the database. The market segment for both is Desktop, and both are listed as Active in production status. The AMD part has a multiplier unlocked, while the Intel part does not. The release dates differ as well: the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has a release date of 2025-02-23, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a release date of 2026-03-08.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G boosts to 4.20 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz versus the Intel part's 2.10 GHz.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Does either CPU support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each CPU support?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G supports DDR4 only, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G is built on a 7 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is built on a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every measured category because it is the only part with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,751 and single-core score of 3,070 are the only Cinebench results recorded. Its Passmark multithread score of 25,590 and single-thread score of 3,718 are likewise the only Passmark results. For data compression, integer math, floating point math, encryption, extended instructions, physics, random string sorting, and prime number finding, the Intel part has scores and the AMD part has none.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G wins only in specification categories. Its base clock of 4.00 GHz exceeds the Intel base clock of 2.10 GHz. Its 7 nm process node is smaller than the Intel 10 nm node. Its TDP of 65 W is higher than the Intel TDP of 45 W, which means it draws more power, but that is also the only TDP figure recorded for either part. The AMD part also uses the AM4 socket, which is a different platform from the Intel Socket 1700.

In terms of cache hierarchy, the Intel part wins on L1 (80 KB per core versus 64 KB), L2 (2 MB per core versus 512 KB), and L3 (24 MB shared versus 8 MB). In memory bandwidth, the Intel part wins at 76.8 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part also wins on PCIe generation, Gen 5 versus Gen 3, and on ECC support, which the AMD part lacks.

The percentile ranking also favors the Intel part: 83rd percentile versus 50th for the AMD part. The average benchmark score of 32,924 for the Intel part contrasts with 0 for the AMD part. The nearest rivals for the Intel part, all within 0.5% of its average score, include the Intel Core i7-12700, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no nearest rivals listed.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 4.00 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.20 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. TDP is 65 W for AMD and 45 W for Intel.

Sockets differ: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture is Zen 3 for AMD, with no architecture listed for Intel. Codename is Cezanne for AMD and Bartlett Lake for Intel. Generation is Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) for AMD and Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) for Intel. Process node is 7 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. Foundry is TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. Transistor count is 10,700 million for AMD, with none listed for Intel. Die size is 180 mm² for AMD, with none listed for Intel.

Cache differs in every level: L1 is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel. L2 is 512 KB per core for AMD versus 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 is 8 MB for AMD versus 24 MB shared for Intel. Memory support is DDR4 for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bus is dual-channel for both. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for AMD versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is false for AMD and true for Intel. PCIe is Gen 3 with 16 lanes for AMD versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 6 for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel.

Market segment is Desktop for both, and production status is Active for both. Release dates are 2025-02-23 for AMD and 2026-03-08 for Intel. The launch MSRP is null for AMD and $221 for Intel. The multiplier is unlocked for AMD and locked for Intel. Part numbers are 100-000001802 for AMD and SA4QM for Intel. The Intel part has a full benchmark suite and an average benchmark score of 32,924 at the 83rd percentile. The AMD part has no benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0 at the 50th percentile.