AMD Ryzen 3 5305G vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a full recorded suite for the Intel Core i7-14701TE, while the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has no recorded benchmark entries. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the Intel part's measured results against its nearest rivals, and on the architectural and specification differences between the two processors.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE records an average benchmark score of 26013, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals cluster tightly around this figure. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 25981, a delta of 0.1 percent, meaning the Intel part is essentially tied with it. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26106, putting the Intel part 0.4 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scores 25880, with the Intel part ahead by 0.5 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, with the Intel part 0.7 percent behind. These four rivals bracket the Core i7-14701TE within a narrow band of less than one percent in either direction, indicating that the Intel processor sits in a performance class where small variations in workload determine the order.

Looking at the specific Cinebench results for the Intel Core i7-14701TE, the multicore scores show consistent scaling across versions. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it records 1716 points. In Cinebench R20 multicore, it records 7154 points. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it records 17035 points. The single-core scores follow a similar progression: 242 points in R15, 1010 points in R20, and 2405 points in R23. These numbers indicate that the single-core performance scales roughly proportionally with the multicore performance across the three Cinebench versions, which is typical for a processor with a uniform core design.

The PassMark suite provides a broader view of workload-specific behavior. In integer math, the Core i7-14701TE scores 65792. In floating point math, it scores 50219. The floating point result is notably lower than the integer result, suggesting that the processor handles integer-heavy workloads more efficiently than floating-point-heavy ones. Data compression scores 220520, which is the highest single score in the recorded suite. Data encryption scores 11699, a much lower figure that reflects the serial nature of many encryption algorithms. Extended instructions score 14354. Find prime numbers scores 143, a very low figure that indicates this workload does not scale well on this processor. Random string sorting scores 22760. Physics scores 1860. The multithread score is 20042, while the single-thread score is 2637.

The single-thread score of 2637 is particularly relevant when comparing to the Ryzen 3 5305G, which has a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The Intel part's boost clock of 5.20 GHz is substantially higher, and the recorded single-thread performance reflects that advantage. However, without benchmark data for the AMD part, the database cannot provide a direct measured comparison between the two specific processors. The analysis must therefore rely on the architectural and specification differences documented in the database.

The Verdict

The data in the database supports a clear distinction between these two processors, though the lack of recorded benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G limits the comparison to architectural and specification analysis. The Intel Core i7-14701TE records a 78th percentile position among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 26013. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G records a 50th percentile position and an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than actual performance.

The Intel part offers double the cores and double the threads: 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads. In heavily multithreaded workloads, this core and thread advantage translates into a significant throughput difference. The Intel part also has a much larger L3 cache, 33 MB shared versus 8 MB on the AMD part, and a larger L2 cache, 2 MB per core versus 512 KB per core. The L1 cache is also larger on the Intel part, 80 KB per core versus 64 KB per core.

The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR4. The Intel part supports ECC memory, while the AMD part does not. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The Intel part has a lower TDP of 45 watts compared to 65 watts for the AMD part, despite delivering higher clock speeds and more cores.

The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part does not. For users who prioritize overclocking flexibility, the AMD part offers that option. The AMD part also has a higher base clock, 4.00 GHz versus 2.10 GHz, which can benefit lightly threaded workloads that do not boost.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G uses the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne, part of the 5000 series. It is built on a 7 nm process node at TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel.

The process node difference is significant. The AMD part uses a 7 nm process, which is denser than the 10 nm process used by the Intel part. This is reflected in the transistor count and die size. The AMD part has 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². The Intel part has no recorded transistor count, but has a die size of 257 mm². The larger die size on the Intel part, combined with the older process node, suggests a less dense design.

The cache hierarchy differs in structure as well as size. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's L3 cache is over four times larger, which can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data and improve performance in workloads with large working sets.

The integrated graphics differ between the two parts. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G uses Radeon Vega 6 graphics. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The database records no benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so a direct performance comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

The memory support differs in scope. The AMD part supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The inclusion of DDR5 support on the Intel part is notable, as DDR5 memory offers higher bandwidth than DDR4 in general, though the database does not record a specific bandwidth number for the Intel part.

The PCIe support differs significantly. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. PCIe Gen 5 offers substantially higher bandwidth per lane than PCIe Gen 3, which can benefit high-throughput devices such as recent GPUs and NVMe storage.

The production status for both parts is recorded as Active. The release dates differ, with the AMD part releasing on 2025-02-23 and the Intel part releasing on 2024-06-30. The Intel part predates the AMD part by roughly eight months.

Specification Differences

The database records several specification fields where the two processors differ. Core count differs: the AMD part has 4 cores, the Intel part has 8 cores. Thread count differs: the AMD part has 8 threads, the Intel part has 16 threads. Base clock differs: the AMD part runs at 4.00 GHz, the Intel part at 2.10 GHz. Boost clock differs: the AMD part boosts to 4.20 GHz, the Intel part to 5.20 GHz.

TDP differs: the AMD part is rated at 65 watts, the Intel part at 45 watts. Socket differs: the AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. Architecture differs: Zen 3 versus Raptor Lake. Codename differs: Cezanne versus Raptor Lake-R. Generation differs: Ryzen 3 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) versus Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Process node differs: 7 nm for the AMD part, 10 nm for the Intel part. Foundry differs: TSMC for AMD, Intel for the Intel part. Transistor count is recorded for the AMD part at 10,700 million, but not for the Intel part. Die size differs: 180 mm² for the AMD part, 257 mm² for the Intel part.

L1 cache per core differs: 64 KB on the AMD part, 80 KB on the Intel part. L2 cache per core differs: 512 KB on the AMD part, 2 MB on the Intel part. L3 cache differs: 8 MB on the AMD part, 33 MB shared on the Intel part.

Memory support differs: DDR4 only on the AMD part, DDR4 and DDR5 on the Intel part. Memory bandwidth is recorded for the AMD part at 51.2 GB/s, but not for the Intel part. ECC memory support differs: not supported on the AMD part, supported on the Intel part.

PCIe version differs: Gen 3 on the AMD part, Gen 5 on the Intel part. Both use 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon Vega 6 on the AMD part, UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel part. Market segment is Desktop for both.

Multiplier unlock status differs: the AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, the Intel part does not. Part numbers differ: 100-000001802 for the AMD part, Q49GSRNJL for the Intel part. The launch MSRP is not recorded for either part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

The Intel Core i7-14701TE boosts to 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G boosts to 4.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G supports DDR4 memory only. The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has an unlocked multiplier?

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel Core i7-14701TE does not have an unlocked multiplier.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins in scenarios that benefit from high core counts and large caches. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide double the parallel execution capacity of the AMD part. The 33 MB shared L3 cache is over four times larger than the 8 MB on the AMD part, which helps in workloads that repeatedly access large datasets. The recorded Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17035 and PassMark multithread score of 20042 indicate strong multithreaded throughput. The Intel part also supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, which can provide higher bandwidth for memory-intensive and I/O-intensive tasks. Its 45 watt TDP is lower than the AMD part's 65 watt TDP, which matters for systems with tighter thermal or power constraints. The ECC memory support is an advantage for systems that require error-correcting memory.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5305G wins in scenarios that favor higher base clocks and overclocking flexibility. Its base clock of 4.00 GHz is nearly double the Intel part's 2.10 GHz base clock. For lightly threaded workloads that operate at or near base clock frequencies, the AMD part can deliver strong responsiveness. The unlocked multiplier allows manual overclocking, which the Intel part does not permit. The AMD part uses the AM4 socket, which may be compatible with existing AM4 motherboards, and it uses PCIe Gen 3, which is sufficient for many current devices. Its smaller 180 mm² die size and 7 nm process node indicate a more compact and potentially more power-efficient design per unit of area, though the database does not record direct power consumption measurements beyond TDP.

The 7 nm process node gives the AMD part a manufacturing advantage in terms of transistor density, with 10,700 million transistors packed into 180 mm². The Intel part's 257 mm² die size is larger, but the database records no transistor count for it, so a direct density comparison is not possible. The AMD part's Radeon Vega 6 integrated graphics and the Intel part's UHD Graphics 770 are both recorded, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot determine which offers better graphical performance.

The Intel part records a 78th percentile position among all CPUs, while the AMD part records a 50th percentile position. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 26013 places it in the company of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, all within one percent of its score. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores, so its percentile position reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance. For workloads that depend on multithreaded performance, large caches, modern memory standards, and PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth, the Intel Core i7-14701TE is the stronger choice based on the recorded data. For workloads that depend on high base clock speed and overclocking flexibility, and for systems already invested in the AM4 platform, the AMD Ryzen 3 5305G offers those specific advantages.