AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Core 5 223PQE

The database records two processors with sharply different design goals: the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U is a low-power mobile part from the 3000 series, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE is a high-power desktop chip from the Bartlett Lake generation. The recorded specifications show an 8-core, 16-thread Intel processor with a 125 W TDP facing a 2-core, 2-thread AMD processor with a 15 W TDP. Benchmark data exists only for the AMD side, with the Intel part showing no recorded scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparison but still allows analysis of architectural and specification differences.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U boost clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a TDP of 15 W, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 W, an 8x difference in thermal design power.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U does not.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 only, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U is built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses the Picasso architecture, which is part of the Zen+ generation. It is manufactured on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries and contains 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded in the database. These process differences point to distinct design philosophies: the AMD part prioritizes efficiency and low power, while the Intel part targets higher performance within a desktop power envelope.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip offers 6x the total L3 cache capacity, which supports its larger core count and multithreaded workload handling. The per-core L1 cache is larger on the AMD chip, but the Intel chip compensates with much larger L2 and L3 allocations.

Memory architecture also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with dual-channel access, but delivers a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. That bandwidth figure is roughly 2.3x higher than the AMD part, which matters for memory-intensive applications. ECC memory support is present on the Intel chip but absent on the AMD chip, making the Intel part more suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. The newer PCIe generation on the Intel side offers substantially higher transfer rates for compatible devices. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip uses Radeon Vega 8, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770.

The market segments recorded in the database are direct indicators of intended use. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U is listed as a mobile processor with an AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE is a desktop processor with an Intel Socket 1700. The production status for both is Active, and neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U wins in power efficiency and portability. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light mobile systems where thermal and battery constraints dominate. The database lists it as a mobile part, and its low power draw is the clearest advantage. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a graphics solution within the same package, which fits a compact mobile design. The 12 nm process, while older than the Intel 10 nm node, is paired with a modest core configuration that keeps power consumption minimal.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins in raw compute capability. It has 4x the cores and 8x the threads of the AMD part, along with a 5.50 GHz boost clock versus 3.20 GHz. The 24 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth give it a strong foundation for multithreaded desktop workloads. The support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity positions it for modern desktop platforms. ECC memory support adds a reliability feature that the AMD part lacks, which can matter for workstation-class tasks.

The AMD chip also wins on the basis of recorded benchmark data. The database contains passmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, including a multithread score of 3348 and a single-thread score of 1592. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its measured performance cannot be compared directly. The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 6247 and a percentile rank of 62 against all CPUs in the database.

The Intel chip holds a clear specification-level advantage for desktop users who need many cores, high clock speeds, and modern platform features. The AMD chip holds the advantage for mobile users who need a low-power processor with integrated graphics and a small footprint. The recorded data shows these are not direct competitors in the same usage scenario, so each wins in the context of its own market segment.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and Intel Core 5 223PQE differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD part has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds are 1.90 GHz for the AMD chip and 4.00 GHz for the Intel chip. Boost clocks are 3.20 GHz and 5.50 GHz respectively. The TDP difference is stark: 15 W for the AMD chip versus 125 W for the Intel chip.

Cache specifications diverge as well. The AMD chip has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support shows the AMD chip limited to DDR4, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 38.4 GB/s for the AMD chip and 89.6 GB/s for the Intel chip. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel chip.

PCIe connectivity differs in both generation and lane count. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8 on the AMD chip and UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel chip. Socket types are entirely different: AMD Socket FP5 for the mobile part and Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop part.

Process technology shows a 12 nm node for the AMD chip at GlobalFoundries and a 10 nm node for the Intel chip at Intel. The AMD chip has a recorded transistor count of 4,940 million and a die size of 210 mm², while the Intel chip has neither recorded. Manufacturing foundry and process node are both distinct. The AMD chip has a part number of YM3100C4T2OFG, while the Intel chip has a part number of SA4QC.

Release dates differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a release date of 2026-05-31, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $319, which is recorded once here; the AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded. The production status for both processors is Active. The AMD chip is from the 3000 series, while the Intel chip has no series designation recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors. The winsA and winsB fields are both 0, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This means no direct comparison scores exist in the recorded data. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has an empty benchmarks array with an average benchmark score of 0, so no measured performance data is available for it.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a full set of passmark benchmark scores in the database. Its multithread score is 3348, and its single-thread score is 1592. Other recorded scores include data compression at 38455, data encryption at 1972, extended instructions at 2116, find prime numbers at 18, floating point math at 5854, integer math at 8873, physics at 232, and random string sorting at 4666. The average benchmark score for the AMD chip is 6247, with a percentile rank of 62 against all CPUs.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U are recorded with specific scores and deltas. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an average score of 6231, which is 0.3% behind the 3100U. The AMD EPYC 7272 has an average score of 6186, which is 1% behind. The Intel Core i9-10920X has an average score of 6347, which is 1.6% ahead of the 3100U. The Intel Core i9-7940X has an average score of 6147, which is 1.6% behind. These rivals are all high-core-count desktop and server processors, which shows the 3100U average score sits in a competitive range despite its 2-core configuration.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no nearest rivals recorded and no benchmark scores, so its position in the database is based entirely on specifications. The recorded data indicates its core count, clock speeds, cache, and memory bandwidth would place it well above the AMD chip in raw throughput, but no measured scores confirm this. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means the only numerical performance comparison available is the AMD chip against its own rivals, not against the Intel chip.

The recorded scores for the AMD chip show its strongest result in data compression at 38455, which is far higher than its other passmark scores. The find prime numbers score of 18 is the lowest recorded result. The floating point math score of 5854 and integer math score of 8873 give a mixed picture of arithmetic performance. The physics score of 232 and random string sorting score of 4666 round out the measured workload results. These numbers provide a baseline for the AMD chip but cannot be compared to the Intel chip due to missing data.

The specification gap between the two processors is large enough that a direct benchmark comparison would likely favor the Intel chip in multithreaded tasks, given its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB L3 cache. The AMD chip would likely favor lower-power scenarios. The database does not contain the scores to confirm either expectation, so the analysis must rest on the recorded specifications and the available AMD benchmark data. The Intel Core 5 223PQE remains a specification-only entry, with its performance profile left unmeasured in the database.