AMD Ryzen 3 3100U vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and Intel Core i5-14501TE occupy different corners of the processor market, with the former designed for low-power mobile systems and the latter targeting desktop efficiency. The recorded data shows a significant gap in core counts, thread counts, clock speeds, and cache sizes, which translates into a clear performance hierarchy. The Ryzen 3 3100U relies on its integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics and a 15 W power envelope, while the Core i5-14501TE brings six cores, twelve threads, and a 45 W TDP to the table. This analysis draws exclusively from the database entries for both parts, focusing on benchmark results, architectural differences, and the practical implications of each specification set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Instead, the Ryzen 3 3100U has a full set of PassMark test scores, while the Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark entries. This absence of data means no direct score comparisons can be made between the two processors. The Ryzen 3 3100U’s average benchmark score is 6247, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X with an average score of 6231, a delta of 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 7272 with a score of 6186, a delta of 1%. The Intel Core i9-10920X sits above it with a score of 6347, a delta of -1.6%, while the Intel Core i9-7940X trails at 6147, a delta of 1.6%. These figures indicate that the Ryzen 3 3100U performs within a narrow band of these older high-end desktop parts, despite its mobile-oriented design.

Within its own benchmark suite, the Ryzen 3 3100U shows notable strengths in specific workloads. The PassMark data compression test yields a score of 38455, which is its highest individual result and suggests efficient handling of compression algorithms. Integer math scores 8873, and floating-point math scores 5854, indicating balanced arithmetic performance. The single-thread score is 1592, which is consistent across both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread entries. The multithread score is 3348, which reflects the processor’s two cores and two threads. Random string sorting produces a score of 4666, while extended instructions score 2116 and data encryption scores 1972. The lowest result is the find prime numbers test at 18, and the physics test scores 232. These numbers paint a picture of a processor that handles data compression and integer operations well relative to its modest core count, but falls behind in prime number calculations and physics simulations, which often scale with raw core throughput.

The Core i5-14501TE, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile rank is 50, which is lower than the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 62nd percentile. However, this percentile is based on incomplete data, as the absence of scores means the figure likely reflects a default or placeholder value rather than a measured result. The nearest rivals field for the Core i5-14501TE is empty, so there are no comparable scores to contextualize its performance. Without recorded measurements, the database cannot confirm how the Core i5-14501TE performs in any specific workload. The Ryzen 3 3100U, therefore, has the only concrete benchmark evidence, and its scores must stand as the sole numerical basis for performance claims.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between the two processors is stark. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses the Picasso codename, which is built on the Zen+ architecture and falls under the Ryzen 3 generation. It is fabricated on a 12 nm process node by GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 210 mm² and a transistor count of 4,940 million. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake codename, specifically Raptor Lake-R, which is part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Its process node is listed as 10 nm, produced by Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. This tripling of cores and sixfold increase in threads gives the Intel processor a substantial theoretical advantage in multi-threaded workloads, though no benchmark data exists to confirm it. Clock speeds also diverge: the Ryzen 3 3100U has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz, while the Core i5-14501TE runs at 2.20 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost. The higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz suggests the Intel part can reach much higher single-thread speeds, which typically benefits tasks like web browsing, application launches, and lightly threaded games.

Cache hierarchies are another major differentiator. The Ryzen 3 3100U provides 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-14501TE offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part’s L3 cache is six times larger than the AMD part’s, which can improve hit rates for frequently accessed data and reduce memory latency. The L2 cache per core is also more than double on the Intel side, at 1.25 MB versus 512 KB.

Memory support further separates the two. The Ryzen 3 3100U supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also in dual-channel mode, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory support differs as well: the Ryzen 3 3100U does not support ECC, while the Core i5-14501TE does. This makes the Intel processor suitable for error-correcting memory setups, which are often required in server or workstation environments.

PCIe capabilities vary. The Ryzen 3 3100U is limited to PCIe Gen 3, while the Core i5-14501TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available on the CPU side. This newer PCIe generation offers higher bandwidth for compatible devices, such as NVMe SSDs and graphics cards, though the practical impact depends on the rest of the system. Integrated graphics also differ: the Ryzen 3 3100U uses Radeon Vega 8, while the Core i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770. Both provide display output, but their performance characteristics are not directly compared in the database.

Thermal design power highlights the intended use cases. The Ryzen 3 3100U has a TDP of 15 W, which is typical for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is critical. The Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 W, indicating a desktop-oriented design that can sustain higher power draw and likely requires active cooling. The socket types confirm this split: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP5, which is a mobile platform, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform. Release dates also differ, with the Ryzen 3 3100U listed as 2026-05-31 and the Core i5-14501TE as 2024-06-30, though the database does not provide further context on availability.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the strengths of each processor are clear. The Ryzen 3 3100U wins in energy efficiency, as indicated by its 15 W TDP compared to the Core i5-14501TE’s 45 W TDP. This makes it a better fit for mobile devices where battery life and thermal limits are primary constraints. The Ryzen 3 3100U also has a higher percentile rank at 62 versus 50, though this is based on its available benchmark scores and the Intel part’s lack of data. Its benchmark suite demonstrates competence in data compression, integer math, and floating-point math, with scores of 38455, 8873, and 5854 respectively. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a built-in GPU solution, which is standard for mobile processors.

The Core i5-14501TE wins in raw specification terms. Its 6 cores and 12 threads dwarf the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 2 cores and 2 threads, which should translate into much better multi-threaded performance in tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, though the database lacks direct scores to verify this. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz is substantially higher than the Ryzen 3 3100U’s 3.20 GHz, suggesting superior single-thread responsiveness. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus 4 MB gives the Intel part a large advantage in cache-sensitive workloads. PCIe Gen 5 support, ECC memory support, and dual DDR4/DDR5 memory compatibility are all features the Ryzen 3 3100U lacks. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU also provides a modern iGPU option for desktop builds without a discrete graphics card.

The use-case split is therefore straightforward from the data. The Ryzen 3 3100U suits low-power, mobile computing scenarios where efficiency is paramount and benchmark scores are secondary to battery life. The Core i5-14501TE targets desktop systems where performance, expandability, and memory flexibility matter more than power draw. The lack of benchmark data for the Intel part means its performance advantages are inferred from specifications rather than confirmed by measurements, but the core count, clock speed, and cache size differences are compelling indicators.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 2 cores and 2 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Does the Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What process node does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U uses a 12 nm process node fabricated by GlobalFoundries. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U has a TDP of 15 W, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-14501TE’s TDP of 45 W.

The Verdict

The data points clearly toward the Intel Core i5-14501TE for users who prioritize processing power and modern features. Its six cores, twelve threads, 5.10 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB L3 cache provide a specification sheet that outmatches the Ryzen 3 3100U across nearly every performance metric. The support for ECC memory, PCIe Gen 5, and both DDR4 and DDR5 memory makes it a flexible choice for desktop builds that may evolve over time. The lack of benchmark scores for the Intel part is a limitation in the database, but the specification gaps are so large that even modest per-core performance would leave the Ryzen 3 3100U behind in multi-threaded tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100U remains relevant for a narrow but valid use case: low-power mobile systems. Its 15 W TDP is one-third of the Intel part’s 45 W TDP, making it suitable for laptops and compact devices where heat dissipation and battery life are critical. Its benchmark scores, including an average of 6247 and a 62nd percentile rank, show that it is not a slouch in its intended segment, particularly in data compression and integer math. However, those scores are absolute, not scaled for power, so they do not close the gap with a six-core desktop processor.

For a desktop user seeking raw performance and future-proofing, the Core i5-14501TE is the logical choice based on specifications. For a mobile user who values efficiency above all, the Ryzen 3 3100U has a clear role. The database does not support a recommendation for the Ryzen 3 3100U in desktop workloads, given the Intel part’s superior core count, clock speeds, and cache. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded, so cost is not a factor in this analysis.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 3100U | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 2 | 6 |

| Threads | 2 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1.90 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Picasso | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen+ (Picasso)) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 215 mm² |

| Transistors | 4,940 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2026-05-31 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |