AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive picture: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins all 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 3 210. The Ryzen 3 210 does not secure a single win in any tested workload. The largest margin comes in PassMark integer math, where the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 121754 against 37933, a 68.8% advantage. Floating point math follows closely, with the AI 9 HX 375 at 75153 versus 23649, a 68.5% lead.

Multi-core performance shows a similar pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AI 9 HX 375 posts 3334 against 1128, a 66.2% gap. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows 21812 versus 11198, a 48.7% difference. PassMark multi-thread scores are 32916 versus 13585, a 58.7% lead for the AI 9 HX 375. Data compression is another strong area: 404918 versus 152017, a 62.5% margin. Data encryption follows with 20802 versus 8607, a 58.6% gap.

Single-core results are closer, though the AI 9 HX 375 still wins across the board. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the scores are 1988 versus 1581, a 20.5% difference. The PassMark single-thread test shows 3867 versus 3724, a narrow 3.7% margin. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 301 versus 159, a 47.2% gap. The smaller single-core margins suggest the architectural advantage narrows when fewer cores are active, but the AI 9 HX 375 retains a measurable lead in every recorded test.

Other PassMark sub-tests reinforce the trend. Extended instructions score 29269 versus 11464, a 60.8% advantage. Prime number finding shows 122 versus 49, a 59.8% gap. Random string sorting delivers 44552 versus 19454, a 56.3% lead. Physics simulation scores 1819 versus 821, a 54.9% margin. The average benchmark score for the AI 9 HX 375 is 46030, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The Ryzen 3 210 averages 17321, sitting in the 71st percentile. This 46.9% difference in average score reflects the consistent multi-core dominance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different generations and use different microarchitectures. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is built on Zen 4 with the Hawk Point codename, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Zen 5 with the Strix Point codename. Both are manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but the die sizes differ substantially: the Ryzen 3 210 has a 137 mm² die with 20,900 million transistors, while the AI 9 HX 375 has a 233 mm² die with no transistor count recorded in the database.

Core counts vary significantly. The Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 12 cores and 24 threads, triple the core count and triple the thread count. This explains the large multi-core benchmark gaps. The AI 9 HX 375 also has a higher boost clock at 5.10 GHz versus 4.70 GHz, though its base clock is lower at 2.00 GHz versus 3.00 GHz.

Cache hierarchies differ in size and organization. The Ryzen 3 210 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The AI 9 HX 375 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The doubled L3 cache on the AI 9 HX 375 contributes to its single-core lead, particularly in memory-sensitive workloads.

Memory support also differs. The Ryzen 3 210 supports DDR5 only, while the AI 9 HX 375 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use a dual-channel memory bus and have identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe connectivity shows a small difference: the Ryzen 3 210 offers Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the AI 9 HX 375 offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Radeon 740M, while the AI 9 HX 375 uses the Radeon 890M. The sockets are not compatible: the Ryzen 3 210 uses AMD Socket FP7, and the AI 9 HX 375 uses AMD Socket FP8. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are marked as Active in production. The release dates differ by roughly six months: the AI 9 HX 375 was released on 2024-06-30, and the Ryzen 3 210 on 2025-01-05.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AI 9 HX 375 scores 1988 versus 1581 for the Ryzen 3 210, a 20.5% lead. In PassMark single-thread, the margin narrows to 3.7% (3867 versus 3724).

Q: How do the processors compare in multi-core workloads?

A: The AI 9 HX 375 leads by 66.2% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (3334 versus 1128) and by 48.7% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (21812 versus 11198). PassMark multi-thread shows a 58.7% advantage (32916 versus 13585).

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 210 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses AMD Socket FP8.

Q: What are the architectural generations?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 uses Zen 4 with the Hawk Point codename. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Zen 5 with the Strix Point codename.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 8 MB found on the Ryzen 3 210.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 210 | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Strix Point |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 233 mm² |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | Radeon 890M |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |

Both processors share a 28 W TDP, dual-channel memory bus, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, non-ECC memory, TSMC as the foundry, a 4 nm process node, and a locked multiplier. Both are classified as Mobile market segment processors with Active production status.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its largest advantages appear in multi-core and compute-heavy workloads. PassMark integer math, floating point math, data compression, and extended instructions all show leads above 60%. These results point toward workloads that scale with core count and thread count, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific simulation, and data processing tasks.

The single-thread results show a smaller but consistent advantage for the AI 9 HX 375. The 3.7% lead in PassMark single-thread and the 20.5% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest that the Zen 5 architecture and higher boost clock provide tangible benefits even in lightly threaded applications. Tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and single-threaded legacy software will still favor the AI 9 HX 375, but the margin is much less pronounced.

The Ryzen 3 210 does not win any recorded comparison, but its lower core count and smaller cache footprint make it a lighter option in terms of die size. Its 137 mm² die is roughly 41% smaller than the 233 mm² die of the AI 9 HX 375. For systems where the larger processor is not required, the smaller die could translate into different thermal and board layout characteristics, though the database does not record power consumption beyond the shared 28 W TDP.

The integrated graphics differ as well, with the Radeon 740M on the Ryzen 3 210 and the Radeon 890M on the AI 9 HX 375. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, but the iGPU model numbers indicate a generational and capability difference. The AI 9 HX 375 also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Ryzen 3 210 does not, potentially enabling lower-power memory configurations in systems designed around the former.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 across every recorded benchmark. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with the Zen 5 architecture and 16 MB of L3 cache, deliver substantial multi-core advantages. The 89th percentile ranking versus the 71st percentile for the Ryzen 3 210 confirms a higher overall performance tier. The AI 9 HX 375 also wins in single-core tests, though by smaller margins, making it the better choice for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The Ryzen 3 210 remains a functional processor with a 71st percentile standing, but the recorded data does not show any workload where it outperforms the AI 9 HX 375. Its smaller die and lower core count could appeal to designs where board space or specific thermal profiles matter, but the performance delta is decisive. For any user choosing between these two based on the database records, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is the stronger option in every measured metric. The shared 28 W TDP means the performance advantage comes without an increase in the thermal design power envelope, reinforcing the architectural efficiency gain of Zen 5 over Zen 4.