AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 are both mobile processors built on TSMC's 4 nm process, but they target entirely different performance classes. The data in the database shows a clear hierarchy: the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 wins every single head-to-head benchmark recorded, while the Ryzen 3 210 operates in a lower tier. This analysis breaks down where each processor fits, how their architectures diverge, and what the benchmark scores actually mean for different workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows no benchmark victories for the AMD Ryzen 3 210. Across all 15 head-to-head tests, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 takes the win. This is not a close contest; the Ryzen 3 210 is positioned as an entry-level mobile part, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a high-end, 12-core powerhouse. The Ryzen 3 210's strengths are relative to its own class, not against this particular rival.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 wins decisively in heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21761 versus the Ryzen 3 210's 11198, a delta of -48.5% for the smaller chip. The gap is even larger in PassMark integer math, where the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 122933 against 37933, a 69.1% deficit for the Ryzen 3 210. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 simply out-muscles the 4-core, 8-thread Ryzen 3 210 in any task that scales with core count.

The Ryzen 3 210 does have a niche where the gap narrows considerably: single-threaded performance. In PassMark single-thread, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 3973 versus 3724 for the Ryzen 3 210, a margin of only 6.3%. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads with 2018 against 1581, a 21.7% advantage. This suggests that for lightly threaded tasks, such as basic office work or web browsing, the Ryzen 3 210 is not far behind, despite its much lower core count. The higher boost clock of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5.10 GHz versus 4.70 GHz) helps, but the Zen 5 architecture also contributes to the single-thread lead.

For users, the choice is stark. The Ryzen 3 210 is suited for basic mobile computing where power efficiency and low cost are priorities, though the database does not include pricing. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is for demanding multi-threaded applications like video rendering, 3D modeling, or software compilation, where its 24 threads deliver massive parallel throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses Zen 5 under the codename Strix Point. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, but the similarities end there.

The core counts diverge significantly. The Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses a hybrid configuration of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, as indicated in its generation field "Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)". The Ryzen 3 210 is purely Zen 4.

Cache hierarchies are also different. The Ryzen 3 210 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 16 MB of L3 cache. This doubling of L3 cache is a significant advantage for the larger chip in workloads that benefit from larger working sets.

The integrated graphics are a major differentiator. The Ryzen 3 210 includes the Radeon 740M, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes the Radeon 890M. The database does not include specific iGPU benchmark scores, but the model number suggests the Radeon 890M is the more capable part.

Socket and platform support differ. The Ryzen 3 210 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses AMD Socket FP8. Both support dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, but the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Ryzen 3 210 only lists DDR5. PCIe lane counts also differ: the Ryzen 3 210 has Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The die size is notably different. The Ryzen 3 210 has a die size of 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a larger die at 233 mm², and the transistor count is not listed in the database. The larger die is expected given the 12-core design and larger L3 cache.

Base clock speeds are inverted relative to core counts. The Ryzen 3 210 runs at 3.00 GHz base, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 runs at 2.00 GHz base. Boost clocks favor the larger chip: 4.70 GHz for the Ryzen 3 210 versus 5.10 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. Both have a TDP of 28 watts, which is notable given the performance disparity.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a consistent and overwhelming lead for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 3409.5 against 1128 for the Ryzen 3 210, a 66.9% deficit for the smaller chip. The single-core R15 test shows a 48.1% deficit, with scores of 306.5 and 159 respectively.

Cinebench R23 multi-core confirms the pattern: the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 21761, while the Ryzen 3 210 scores 11198, a 48.5% deficit. The single-core R23 test shows a smaller gap of 21.7%, with scores of 2018 and 1581.

PassMark tests reveal the largest deltas. In integer math, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 122933 versus 37933 for the Ryzen 3 210, a 69.1% deficit. Floating point math shows a 69.2% deficit, with scores of 76892 and 23649 respectively. Data compression shows a 65.9% deficit, with scores of 445719 and 152017. Data encryption shows a 61.3% deficit, with scores of 22252 and 8607.

Extended instructions (likely AVX workloads) show a 63.8% deficit, with scores of 31653 and 11464. Find prime numbers shows a 61.1% deficit, with scores of 126 and 49. Random string sorting shows a 60.1% deficit, with scores of 48723 and 19454. Physics tests show a 56.4% deficit, with scores of 1881 and 821. The PassMark multi-thread test shows a 61.3% deficit, with scores of 35148 and 13585.

The only test where the Ryzen 3 210 comes within striking distance is PassMark single-thread and singlethread, both showing 3724 for the Ryzen 3 210 against 3973 for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, a 6.3% deficit. This is the smallest margin in the entire dataset and indicates that for single-threaded tasks, the Ryzen 3 210 is a capable performer.

The average benchmark score for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is 37904, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Ryzen 3 210 has an average score of 17321, placing it in the 71st percentile. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14901E at 37911 and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943, both within 0.1% of its score. The Ryzen 3 210's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 at 17333 and the Intel Core i5-12450H at 17239, showing it competes with older mid-range desktop parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 8 MB of the Ryzen 3 210.

Q: What is the difference in single-threaded PassMark scores?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 3973, while the Ryzen 3 210 scores 3724, a delta of 6.3% in favor of the larger chip.

Q: Which processor supports LPDDR5X memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 lists LPDDR5X support, in addition to DDR5. The Ryzen 3 210 only lists DDR5.

Q: What are the base clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare by model?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 includes the Radeon 740M, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes the Radeon 890M.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the recorded data.

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 210 | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |

|-------|-----------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Strix Point |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 233 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | Radeon 890M |

| Part Number | 100-000001612 | 100-000000994 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |

| Cinebench R15 Multi-core | 1128 | 3409.5 |

| Cinebench R15 Single-core | 159 | 306.5 |

| Cinebench R23 Multi-core | 11198 | 21761 |

| Cinebench R23 Single-core | 1581 | 2018 |

| PassMark Multi-thread | 13585 | 35148 |

| PassMark Single-thread | 3724 | 3973 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 17321 | 37904 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 71 | 86 |