CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9535

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 300W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6780E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 144 Cores / 144 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 108 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 330W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

2,308,822

2,557,582

passmark_data_encryption

127,372

193,004

passmark_extended_instructions

175,784

114,008

passmark_find_prime_numbers

874

708

passmark_floating_point_math

457,047

433,862

passmark_integer_math

730,281

641,817

passmark_multithread

114,528

86,734

passmark_physics

3,834

10,951

passmark_random_string_sorting

247,506

326,954

passmark_single_thread

3,720

1,923

passmark_singlethread

3,720

1,923

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

7,431

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

1,049

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

30,963

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

4,371

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

73,723

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9535 vs Intel Xeon 6780E

The comparison between AMD EPYC 9535 and Xeon 6780E indicates remarkably similar results. These options offer similar scores throughout typical benchmarks, leaving this selection mainly reliant on cost. This performance results validates this assessment. None of the processor possesses a overwhelming advantage. Buyers can decide based on alternative considerations.

Looking at a specification viewpoint, AMD EPYC 9535 and Xeon 6780E share matching specs. Execution counts, frequency speeds, and memory subsystem sizes are virtually equivalent. This spec equivalence justifies the similar test figures. No has a significant hardware advantage. This competition is level.

No chip holds a definitive lead in this comparison. AMD EPYC 9535 edges narrowly in specific workloads, while Xeon 6780E wins different ones. This back-and-forth dynamic demonstrates fundamental parity between these two. The gaps are small and likely imperceptible in actual tasks. Both offer capable throughput.

At the end of the day, buyers can select based on specific requirements rather than raw speed alone. Each AMD EPYC 9535 and Xeon 6780E deliver excellent performance for their given categories. This determination comes down to particular requirements. Both option is good. Buyers couldn't go astray with these options.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9535

6780E

Core Specs

Cores

144 +125.0%

Threads

128

144 +12.5%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.2 -8.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.3

3 -30.2%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.2 -8.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.3

3 -30.2%

Multiplier

22 -8.3%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

108 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

300

330 +10.0%

Configurable TDP

240-300 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Sierra Forest

Codename

Turin

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

66,520 million

—

Die Size

8x 70.6 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$8992

$11350

Part Number

100-000001147

SRPG3

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9535 Details View Xeon 6780E Details