CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9475F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.65 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 400W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6780E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest
CORE SPECS 144 Cores / 144 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 108 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 330W
ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
2,156,305
2,557,582
passmark_data_encryption
116,648
193,004
passmark_extended_instructions
173,169
114,008
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,507
708
passmark_floating_point_math
406,524
433,862
passmark_integer_math
605,696
641,817
passmark_multithread
122,476
86,734
passmark_physics
16,443
10,951
passmark_random_string_sorting
253,936
326,954
passmark_single_thread
3,779
1,923
passmark_singlethread
3,779
1,923
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
7,431
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
1,049
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
30,963
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
4,371
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
73,723

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9475F vs Intel Xeon 6780E

If processing power is remarkably comparable, the matchup between AMD AMD EPYC 9475F processor and Intel's 6780E turns particularly interesting. Both options swap victories across diverse scenarios. This combined outcome is one of surprising balance. Neither emerges as a clear winner. This determination relies on personal needs.

Based on a specification standpoint, AMD AMD EPYC 9475F processor and Intel's 6780E feature similar capabilities. Thread setups, speed frequencies, and L3 configurations are virtually equivalent. The hardware balance explains the matched test numbers. Neither maintains a substantial specification superiority. The playing field is even.

Not one option has a overwhelming superiority here. AMD AMD EPYC 9475F processor beats slightly in some benchmarks, while Intel's 6780E secures alternative tests. The swapping trend indicates fundamental equality between these two. The differences are marginal and potentially unnoticeable in actual usage. The two provide capable capability.

Ultimately, buyers should pick based on platform preference instead of benchmark scores solely. The two AMD AMD EPYC 9475F processor and Intel's 6780E deliver solid capability for their intended price points. This decision depends on individual preferences. Each choice is valid. Users shouldn't go astray here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9475F
6780E
Core Specs
Cores
48
144 +200.0%
Threads
96
144 +50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.65
2.2 -39.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
3 -37.5%
Frequency (GHz)
3.65
2.2 -39.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
3 -37.5%
Multiplier
36.5
22 -39.7%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
96 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
4 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
108 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
400
330 -17.5%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Sierra Forest
Codename
Turin
Sierra Forest
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
578 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$7592
$11350
Part Number
100-000001143
SRPG3
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
106°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9475F Details View Xeon 6780E Details