AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7713P Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 7713P are two 64-core server processors from the EPYC 7003 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture and codenamed Milan. Both chips share nearly identical specifications, including a 2.00 GHz base clock, 3.68 GHz boost clock, 225 W TDP, and 256 MB of shared L3 cache, yet benchmark results show the non-P variant consistently ahead in every measured test. The data indicates a uniform performance advantage for the AMD EPYC 7713, with a 1.7% lead across all Cinebench workloads, while the 7713P trails slightly despite matching core counts and memory configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count for both processors?

A: Both the AMD EPYC 7713 and the AMD EPYC 7713P feature 64 cores and 128 threads, with no differences in this fundamental specification.

Q: How do the two CPUs compare in multi-core Cinebench R23 performance?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 scores 70401 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the AMD EPYC 7713P scores 69229, giving the 7713 a 1.7% advantage.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R20?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 achieves 4174 in Cinebench R20 single-core, compared to 4104 for the 7713P, a 1.7% difference in favor of the 7713.

Q: Are there any differences in memory support between the two chips?

A: No, both processors support DDR4 memory with an eight-channel bus and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth, and both include ECC memory support.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 has an average benchmark score of 20363, while the AMD EPYC 7713P has an average score of 20024, a difference of roughly 1.7%.

Q: How does the launch MSRP differ between the two models?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 had a launch MSRP of $7060, while the AMD EPYC 7713P had a launch MSRP of $5010.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: Both processors share the same percentile ranking at 74, indicating they outperform 74% of all CPUs tracked in the database.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear picture: the AMD EPYC 7713 outperforms the AMD EPYC 7713P in every single test, with a consistent 1.7% margin across all six Cinebench benchmarks. For workloads that depend heavily on multi-threaded performance, such as rendering, scientific computing, or database processing, the 7713 is the statistically superior choice, delivering higher scores in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests. The 7713P, while nearly identical in specification, consistently trails by a small but measurable margin, making it the better option only for buyers who prioritize the lower launch MSRP of $5010 over the 7713's $7060. Given that both chips share the same core count, cache, memory bandwidth, and socket, the performance gap is likely attributable to binning or platform differences, but the data shows no scenario where the 7713P wins a benchmark. For server deployments where every bit of throughput matters, the AMD EPYC 7713 is the recommended pick; for cost-sensitive configurations where a 1.7% performance loss is acceptable, the 7713P offers a viable alternative at a lower launch price.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a uniform pattern: the AMD EPYC 7713 wins all six comparisons, each by a deltaPct of 1.7%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 7713 scores 7096 against 6978 for the 7713P, a lead of 118 points. The single-core R15 test follows the same trend, with 1001 versus 984, a 17-point gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core scores are 29568 for the 7713 and 29076 for the 7713P, a difference of 492 points, while single-core shows 4174 versus 4104, a 70-point spread. The largest absolute difference appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the 7713 achieves 70401 and the 7713P reaches 69229, a gap of 1172 points. The single-core R23 test completes the sweep, with 9939 versus 9773, a 166-point advantage for the 7713. Notably, the deltaPct is identical at 1.7% for every benchmark, suggesting a consistent clock-for-clock or efficiency advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The average benchmark scores reinforce this: 20363 for the 7713 versus 20024 for the 7713P, a 339-point difference that aligns with the per-test margins. In the nearest rivals comparison, the 7713 sits close to the AMD EPYC 9454P (avg score 20422, deltaPct -0.3) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, -0.3), while the 7713P is near the Intel Core i7-11800H (19998, 0.1) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (19928, 0.5). These rival deltas show that the 7713's nearest competitors are slightly ahead, while the 7713P's nearest competitors are slightly behind, reflecting the 1.7% internal gap.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for the AMD EPYC 7713 and the AMD EPYC 7713P are nearly identical, with only two fields showing any divergence. The launch MSRP differs: the 7713 carries a launch MSRP of $7060, while the 7713P has a launch MSRP of $5010, a $2050 difference that likely reflects the P-series positioning as a single-socket variant. The part numbers also differ, with the 7713 listed as 100-000000344100-000000344WOF and the 7713P as 100-000000337100-000000337WOF. Every other specification matches exactly: both use the AMD Socket SP3, have 64 cores and 128 threads, run at a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 3.68 GHz, and share a 225 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is identical, with 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 256 MB shared L3. Memory support is the same, featuring DDR4 with an eight-channel bus and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC capability. PCIe connectivity is also identical, offering Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU only. Both processors are built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 33,200 million transistors and a die size of 8x 81 mm². The release date is the same for both, 2021-03-14, and neither has an unlocked multiplier or integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

From an architectural standpoint, the AMD EPYC 7713 and the AMD EPYC 7713P are indistinguishable. Both belong to the EPYC 7003 series, use the Zen 3 architecture, and carry the codename Milan. The generation field lists both as "EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))", confirming they are from the same product family. The manufacturing details match precisely: a 7 nm process node from TSMC, 33,200 million transistors, and a die composed of 8x 81 mm² chiplets. The cache structure is identical, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 256 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor features 3D V-Cache, and the total L3 field is null, indicating no additional cache beyond the shared 256 MB. The memory controller supports DDR4 with eight channels and 204.8 GB/s peak bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported on both. PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes is available on both chips, limited to CPU-only lanes. The socket is AMD Socket SP3 for both, and the production status is Active. Since both processors share the same architecture, node, and feature set, any performance difference must arise from subtle variations in silicon quality or firmware, though the data does not provide direct evidence for such factors. The 7713P is typically positioned for single-socket servers, while the 7713 may support dual-socket configurations, but the fact pack does not list this distinction explicitly, so it cannot be confirmed here.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 7713 wins in every benchmark category, making it the clear choice for compute-heavy tasks. In multi-threaded workloads, such as Cinebench R15 multi-core (7096 vs 6978), R20 multi-core (29568 vs 29076), and R23 multi-core (70401 vs 69229), the 7713 delivers consistent 1.7% improvements. These gains are meaningful for applications that scale across 128 threads, such as video rendering, 3D animation, or large-scale data analytics, where even a small percentage can translate to reduced wall-clock time. The 7713 also leads in single-threaded tests, with R15 single-core (1001 vs 984), R20 single-core (4174 vs 4104), and R23 single-core (9939 vs 9773), indicating a slight edge in lightly threaded tasks like database transaction processing or latency-sensitive server workloads. However, the 7713P is not without a niche: its lower launch MSRP of $5010 compared to $7060 makes it a more economical entry point for the same core count and memory bandwidth, assuming the 1.7% performance penalty is tolerable. For bulk deployments where many sockets are needed and workloads are not absolutely performance-critical, the 7713P could be favored purely on initial acquisition cost, though the fact pack does not provide ongoing cost data. In terms of raw capability, the 7713 wins all six head-to-head benchmarks and has a higher average benchmark score (20363 vs 20024), so any workload that prioritizes throughput should select the 7713. The 7713P, with its identical architecture and specs, is best suited for scenarios where the budget constraint outweighs the modest performance gap, making it a reasonable secondary option for cost-conscious server builds.