AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Core i7-11800H Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7713 and Intel Core i7-11800H occupy opposite ends of the computing spectrum, and the benchmark data confirms this chasm. The EPYC 7713, a 64-core server behemoth, utterly dominates the 8-core mobile chip in every single shared benchmark, with deltas exceeding 300% in all cases. While the Core i7-11800H is a competent mobile processor, it is completely outclassed by the EPYC 7713 in raw throughput, making this comparison a study in extremes rather than a contest of equals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data presents a one-sided affair. The AMD EPYC 7713 wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and it does so by a remarkable margin. In Cinebench R15, the EPYC 7713 scores 7096 in the multi-core test versus just 1679 for the Intel Core i7-11800H, a delta of 322.6%. The single-core R15 test tells a similar story: 1001 for the EPYC versus 236 for the Intel, a 324.2% advantage. This pattern holds steady across the entire Cinebench suite.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the EPYC 7713 posts 29568 in multi-core, while the i7-11800H manages only 6998, a 322.5% gap. The single-core R20 result shows the EPYC at 4174 against the Intel’s 987, a 322.9% difference. Cinebench R23 reinforces the trend: the EPYC 7713’s multi-core score of 70401 dwarfs the i7-11800H’s 16663, a 322.5% lead. Even in single-core R23, the EPYC’s 9939 score is 322.6% higher than the Intel’s 2352.

These consistent deltas of roughly 322% across all tests are telling. They indicate that the performance advantage is not workload-specific but rather a fundamental reflection of the architectural and resource disparity. The EPYC 7713’s 64 cores and 128 threads simply overwhelm the i7-11800H’s 8 cores and 16 threads in every scenario measured. Even when the workload is limited to a single thread, the EPYC’s higher base clock of 2000 MHz and boost of 3.68 GHz, combined with its Zen 3 architecture, prove superior to the i7-11800H’s 1900 MHz base clock. The benchmark results are unambiguous: the EPYC 7713 is categorically faster.

Where Each One Wins

Given the data, the EPYC 7713 wins in every measurable category within this comparison. Its strengths lie in massive parallel processing, which is reflected in its Cinebench multi-core scores. The 70401 R23 multi-core score indicates that the EPYC 7713 is designed for heavily threaded workloads like server virtualization, scientific computing, and database processing. The 128 threads allow it to handle many concurrent tasks with ease, a capability the i7-11800H simply cannot match.

The Intel Core i7-11800H, while losing all head-to-head benchmarks, does have its own domain. Its advantage is not in raw performance but in its physical characteristics. With a 35 W TDP versus the EPYC’s 225 W TDP, the i7-11800H is built for mobility and efficiency. It features integrated UHD Graphics 750, which the EPYC 7713 lacks entirely. This makes the i7-11800H self-sufficient for basic display output and light graphics tasks in a laptop environment. The i7-11800H’s higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz, compared to the EPYC’s 3.68 GHz, suggests it can respond quickly to short bursts of activity. However, the benchmark scores for single-core performance do not reflect this, as the EPYC still wins the single-core tests by over 300%. The i7-11800H’s win is in its form factor and power envelope, not in computational benchmarks.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark. The AMD EPYC 7713 is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, featuring a massive 33,200 million transistors spread across 8 dies, each measuring 81 mm². Its cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, plus a shared 256 MB L3 cache. This is a server-class design with an eight-channel memory bus providing 204.8 GB/s of bandwidth and support for DDR4 memory with ECC.

In contrast, the Intel Core i7-11800H is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a monolithic 190 mm² die. Its cache configuration is 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 24 MB L3 cache. It uses a dual-channel memory bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, also supporting DDR4 but without ECC. The i7-11800H offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the EPYC 7713 provides 128 lanes. The EPYC 7713 is designed for maximum data throughput and expansion, while the i7-11800H is optimized for a compact mobile footprint. The EPYC’s cache alone is over ten times larger than the Intel’s entire L3 cache, and its memory bandwidth is four times greater. These are not just different chips; they are different classes of hardware.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 has 64 cores and 128 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11800H has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 scores 70401, which is 322.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-11800H’s score of 16663.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-11800H have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-11800H includes UHD Graphics 750. The AMD EPYC 7713 has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i7-11800H does not.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth figures for each processor?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713 has a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s with an eight-channel bus, while the Intel Core i7-11800H has 51.2 GB/s with a dual-channel bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-11800H has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz, compared to the AMD EPYC 7713’s 3.68 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD EPYC 7713 | Intel Core i7-11800H |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 64 | 8 |

| Threads | 128 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2000.00 MHz | 1900.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 225 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | Intel BGA 1787 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Tiger Lake |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 8x 81 mm² | 190 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 256 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 4, 128 Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | UHD Graphics 750 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Transistors | 33,200 million | Not specified |

The Verdict

The choice between these two processors is determined entirely by the use case, as the data leaves no room for ambiguity. The AMD EPYC 7713 is the definitive choice for server and workstation workloads. Its 64 cores, 128 threads, 256 MB of L3 cache, and eight-channel memory bus deliver a 322.5% performance advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core over the Intel part. Any application that can scale across many threads will see a monumental benefit from the EPYC 7713. The data shows it is in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20363, placing it in a league with other high-end server processors. Its launch MSRP is $7060, reflecting its enterprise positioning.

The Intel Core i7-11800H is the appropriate choice for a mobile platform. Its 35 W TDP, integrated UHD Graphics 750, and BGA 1787 socket make it suitable for laptops. While it loses every head-to-head benchmark, its purpose is not to compete with a 64-core server chip. Instead, it offers a balanced mobile experience with a 4.60 GHz boost clock. Its average benchmark score of 19998 is remarkably close to the EPYC 7713’s 20363, but this is due to the inclusion of a broader set of benchmarks for the Intel chip, which skews the average. The i7-11800H’s launch MSRP is $395. For a mobile user, the i7-11800H is the only viable option in this comparison. For anyone needing maximum compute density, the EPYC 7713 is the only choice. The verdict is simple: pick the EPYC 7713 for server tasks, and the i7-11800H for portable computing.