AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Core i7-11800H Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7713P and Intel Core i7-11800H sit at opposite ends of the computing spectrum, yet benchmark averages place them within 0.1% of each other. The EPYC 7713P averages 20,024 points against the i7-11800H's 19,998, a statistical tie that masks radically different performance profiles. Both processors hold the 74th percentile among all CPUs, but their architectures and intended workloads could not be more distinct. The EPYC 7713P is a 64-core server monster; the i7-11800H is an 8-core mobile chip. The data below breaks down exactly where each part excels and why their average scores converge despite such divergent designs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite delivers a unanimous verdict: the AMD EPYC 7713P wins every single comparison, and the margins are astronomical. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the EPYC scores 6,978 against the i7's 1,679, a 315.6% advantage. The single-core R15 test tells the same story, with the EPYC at 984 versus 236, a 316.9% lead. These are not incremental gains; they represent a four-fold performance differential.

The pattern holds across every Cinebench iteration. In R20 multi-core, the EPYC 7713P posts 29,076 points while the i7-11800H manages 6,998, a 315.5% delta. The R20 single-core result shows 4,104 against 987, a 315.8% edge. Cinebench R23 continues the trend: 69,229 versus 16,663 for multi-core and 9,773 versus 2,352 for single-core, both at 315.5% deltas. The EPYC 7713P wins all six head-to-head comparisons, leaving the i7-11800H with zero victories in this benchmark set.

These numbers reveal that the EPYC's advantage is not merely about core count. Its single-core performance also crushes the i7 by over 300%, which is surprising given the i7's higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz against the EPYC's 3.68 GHz. The EPYC's Zen 3 architecture clearly delivers superior instructions per clock, and its massive L3 cache of 256 MB (shared) versus the i7's 24 MB (shared) likely plays a role in feeding data to the cores more efficiently.

Where Each One Wins

The EPYC 7713P is the undisputed champion in every benchmark category recorded in the head-to-head data. It wins all six Cinebench tests, covering both multi-threaded rendering workloads and single-threaded tasks. For server workloads like virtualization, database processing, or scientific computing that rely on raw throughput, the EPYC's 64 cores and 128 threads provide overwhelming parallel processing capability. The data shows a 315.5% to 316.9% advantage across all Cinebench tests, making it the clear choice for any workload that scales with core count.

The i7-11800H does not win a single head-to-head benchmark in this dataset. However, its existence in the mobile segment means it targets a completely different use case: laptops and compact systems where the 225W TDP of the EPYC is simply not feasible. The i7's 35W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 750 make it suitable for portable devices, and its benchmark scores—while far lower—are respectable for a mobile processor. The i7 also supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which is appropriate for consumer laptops, whereas the EPYC requires an eight-channel setup suited for server platforms.

The average benchmark scores tell a nuanced story. The EPYC 7713P's average of 20,024 is derived from six Cinebench results, while the i7-11800H's average of 19,998 comes from 25 diverse tests, including Geekbench, Passmark, and 3DMark. The i7's breadth of testing includes encryption, compression, and physics workloads that are not present in the EPYC's benchmark suite. This suggests the i7 has strengths in specific mobile-oriented tasks that the data does not directly compare, though the head-to-head Cinebench results are unambiguous.

Architecture Differences

The AMD EPYC 7713P uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process manufactured by TSMC. Its codename is Milan, and it belongs to the EPYC 7003 series. The chip contains 33,200 million transistors spread across 8 dies, each measuring 81 mm². The i7-11800H uses Intel's Tiger Lake architecture on a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel. Its die size is 190 mm². The process node difference is significant: 7 nm versus 10 nm, giving AMD a density advantage that helps explain the EPYC's massive core count.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The EPYC 7713P provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 256 MB L3 cache. The i7-11800H offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3. While the i7 has more L1 and L2 per core, the EPYC's total cache capacity is overwhelmingly larger due to its 64 cores. The EPYC's 256 MB L3 cache is a defining feature, enabling large working sets to remain on-chip.

The EPYC supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server reliability; the i7 does not. The EPYC's memory bus is eight-channel with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the i7 is dual-channel with 51.2 GB/s. PCIe lanes also diverge dramatically: the EPYC offers 128 Gen 4 lanes, while the i7 provides 20 Gen 4 lanes. The EPYC targets Socket SP3, while the i7 uses Intel BGA 1787.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious divergence. The EPYC 7713P has 64 cores and 128 threads; the i7-11800H has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are close, with the EPYC at 2000 MHz and the i7 at 1900 MHz, but boost clocks favor the i7 at 4.60 GHz versus the EPYC's 3.68 GHz. The TDP difference is enormous: the EPYC draws up to 225W, while the i7 is rated at 35W, reflecting their server versus mobile positioning.

Memory support is DDR4 for both, but the channel configurations differ. The EPYC uses eight channels versus the i7's two, resulting in 204.8 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. The EPYC supports ECC; the i7 does not. PCIe Gen 4 is available on both, but lane counts are 128 for the EPYC and 20 for the i7. The EPYC has no integrated graphics, while the i7 includes UHD Graphics 750.

Release dates are close, with the EPYC launching on March 14, 2021, and the i7 on May 10, 2021. Both are currently in active production. The EPYC's launch MSRP is $5010; the i7's is $395. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The EPYC's part number is 100-000000337100-000000337WOF, and the i7's is SRKT3.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD EPYC 7713P has 64 cores and 128 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11800H has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much faster is the EPYC 7713P in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The EPYC scores 69,229 points versus the i7's 16,663, representing a 315.5% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-11800H support ECC memory?

A: No, the i7-11800H does not support ECC memory. The AMD EPYC 7713P does support ECC.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these two processors?

A: The EPYC 7713P has a TDP of 225W, while the i7-11800H is rated at 35W.

Q: Which processor has higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-11800H has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz, compared to the EPYC 7713P's 3.68 GHz.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The EPYC 7713P averages 20,024 points, and the i7-11800H averages 19,998 points, a difference of 0.1% in favor of the EPYC.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications?

A: The EPYC 7713P provides 204.8 GB/s over an eight-channel bus, while the i7-11800H provides 51.2 GB/s over a dual-channel bus.