SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a mid-range desktop configuration built around a 6-core Zen 3 processor and a 10 GB Battlemage graphics card. The data positions this combination at the 75th percentile for all tested pairs, with an average of 85.4 FPS across the measured game suite at 1080p ultra settings. This is a system that prioritizes balanced 1080p performance and competent 1440p capability, rather than extreme high-refresh or 4K dominance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, and fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, with 512 KB of L2 and 64 KB of L1 per core. This is a desktop-class part on the AM4 socket, supporting dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The 4,150 million transistors are packed into a 74 mm² die, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking headroom.

Benchmark results show a single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236 in PassMark tests. The single-thread score places it in a competitive position for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multithread score, while not class-leading, is solid for a 6-core part, indicating it can handle moderate parallel workloads without significant strain. The integer math score of 59339 and floating-point math score of 34548 reflect a balanced ALU/FPU design, which translates well to general productivity and scientific computing tasks. The data compression score of 232836 is notably high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and data-heavy workflows.

The CPU holds the 85th percentile among all CPUs tested, which is a strong showing for a mainstream 6-core processor. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, scores an average of 36938, a delta of 0% — meaning these two chips are essentially tied in overall CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% ahead and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.5% ahead. These deltas are within noise, so the 5600F is effectively at parity with its nearest competition. The average benchmark score of 36945 confirms its position as a high-midrange CPU that punches above its core count in some tests, particularly in compression and encryption (13839 score).

Balance and Bottleneck

The 65th percentile GPU and 85th percentile CPU create an interesting dynamic. The CPU is statistically stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own pool. This suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphically-intensive workloads. The data supports this: at 1080p, the average FPS across games is 85.4, but the pair's rank of 3073 out of 3732 pairs indicates that many other combinations produce higher frame rates. The bottleneck shifts to the CPU in lighter titles, where high frame rates approach the CPU's single-thread limits. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 293 FPS at 1080p, while Valorant hits 304 FPS — these numbers are high enough that CPU scheduling and frame pacing become more relevant than GPU raw throughput. Conversely, in heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS 1080p or Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, the GPU is clearly the constraining factor, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames.

The scaling across resolutions confirms this balance. Many titles show a predictable drop from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K. For instance, Call of Duty: Warzone goes from 109 to 97 to 82 FPS across the three resolutions, showing a relatively mild decline due to its optimization. In contrast, a lighter game like Barony scales from 112 to 71 to 37 FPS, indicating that as resolution rises, the GPU's 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and 10 GB VRAM become more stressed. The 65th percentile GPU ranking versus the 85th percentile CPU ranking implies that for 1080p gaming, the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, but at 1440p and above, the GPU's lower relative standing becomes apparent.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage (Arc 5), using TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a fixed 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 10 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x8 and consumes 150 W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. It outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D score of 14195 and a GPU compute score of 7281. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is a modern metric indicating capable DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 and Vulkan score of 96844 suggest strong compute and cross-API compatibility. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s are respectable for a card in this class. Theoretical FP32 throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The 18 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the measured FPS in ray-traced-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS at 1080p) suggests RT workloads will require lower settings or upscaling for smooth play.

The GPU holds the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a delta of 0.1% — the Arc B570 is effectively tied with that mobile chip. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% behind, and the Quadro M4000M is 0.4% behind, while the Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% behind. This places the B570 in a competitive midrange position, though its 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit bus are modest compared to higher-tier cards. For rendering and compute, the 7281 compute score indicates it can handle moderate GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not a workstation-class part.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system excels in esports and lighter titles. Valorant achieves 304 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 293 FPS, both well above the 144 Hz threshold. At 1440p, Valorant still delivers 259 FPS, making it viable for competitive play on high-refresh 1440p monitors. However, AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS 1080p will not satisfy 144 Hz enthusiasts without significant settings reductions.

For streaming, the 6-core/12-thread CPU with a multithread score of 19236 provides enough headroom for x264 encoding at 1080p, though the GPU's compute score of 7281 suggests using the Arc's hardware encoder could offload the CPU. The data compression score of 232836 is beneficial for recording and archiving streams.

For video editing, the CPU's integer math score of 59339 and the GPU's Vulkan score of 96844 indicate a capable combination for timeline editing and effects in 1080p. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p projects, but 4K multi-layer timelines may exceed memory capacity.

For 3D rendering, the GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 and 18 RT cores provide moderate performance. A Blender or similar workload would see acceptable viewport performance, but final renders will be slower than higher-tier GPUs. The CPU's floating-point score of 34548 supports CPU-based rendering as a fallback.

For software development, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 2872 ensures snappy compilation for smaller projects, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data-sensitive workstations.

For student and office work, this system is overkill. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, and the GPU's 2D score of 661 is more than adequate for spreadsheets, browsers, and document editing. The 65 W CPU TDP means low idle power consumption, making it a quiet, efficient workstation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AM4 socket offers a mature upgrade path. The Ryzen 5 5600F supports DDR4 memory, which is more affordable than DDR5, and the dual-channel controller provides 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 4 support (20 lanes from CPU) is sufficient for the Arc B570's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP mean a 450 W suggested PSU is the minimum, but a higher-wattage PSU would allow for future upgrades. The most sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-core-count AM4 CPU, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9, which would slot into the same socket and improve multithreaded workloads like rendering and encoding. For the GPU, a future upgrade would depend on the PSU headroom; the 8-pin connector limits to cards that draw less than 225 W, so a more power-hungry GPU would require a new PSU. The 10 GB VRAM is a current limitation for 4K textures, so a future GPU with more memory would be beneficial for those workloads.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS at ultra settings across the game suite shows a clear 1080p-oriented design. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most titles. Counter-Strike 2 reaches 133 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone hits 109 FPS, and Ready Or Not achieves 107 FPS. Roblox runs at 171 FPS, and Minecraft at 131 FPS. However, heavy titles struggle: Red Dead Redemption 2 is at 36 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 19 FPS. The Medium is particularly demanding at 28 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops by roughly 30-40% in most titles. Valorant remains playable at 259 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 29 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27 FPS. For 1440p gaming, users will need to lower settings to medium or high for AAA titles. The 1440p average across all games is not explicitly stated, but the trend suggests around 40-60 FPS for most titles.

At 3840x2160, only esports and light games remain fluid. Valorant hits 207 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 119 FPS, but most AAA games fall below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 6 FPS. This system is not suitable for 4K gaming except in very undemanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This is a system for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and are willing to adjust settings for AAA titles. It suits esports enthusiasts who want high frame rates in Valorant (304 FPS) and CS:GO (293 FPS) without spending on a flagship GPU. Content creators working in 1080p will find the CPU's compression and encryption scores useful for file handling, and the GPU's 10 GB VRAM handles 1080p video editing comfortably. Software developers will appreciate the strong single-thread performance for code compilation. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable, with the 65 W CPU TDP keeping power costs low. Small business workstations running data analysis or spreadsheet-heavy tasks will benefit from the CPU's 85th percentile ranking. Users who want to play at 1440p will need to be selective about games, as only optimized or lighter titles will maintain 60+ FPS at ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F scores 2872 in PassMark single-thread tests, which is competitive for a 6-core part and results in snappy everyday responsiveness.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming, but 4K textures may exceed capacity.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 75th among all tested pairs, with an average FPS of 85.4 across the measured game suite.

Q: Can this system run ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 18 RT cores, but performance in RT-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS at 1080p ultra) suggests you'll need to lower settings or use upscaling.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with ECC capability, providing 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Arc B570 scores 20556 on average, which is within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Arc A750.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, which accounts for the 150 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP, leaving headroom for standard system components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 36945, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, scores 36938, a delta of 0%, meaning the two are statistically identical. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% faster, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% faster, and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.5% faster. The CPU's multithread score of 19236 and single-thread score of 2872 are the key differentiators.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the B570 is slightly faster. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% behind, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% behind, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% behind. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 are representative of its midrange standing.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its peers more than the GPU does. This creates a CPU-favorable balance for productivity and a GPU-limited experience for gaming at higher resolutions. The pair ranks 3073 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average of 85.4 FPS across games, which is respectable but not top-tier.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, a 6-core/12-thread desktop processor on the AM4 socket, with the Intel Arc B570, a 10 GB desktop GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture. The combination is a desktop-class system that sits at the 75th combined percentile, indicating a solid midrange configuration. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking signals strong processing capability for its class, while the GPU's 65th percentile ranking shows it is a competent but not exceptional graphics solution. The data shows this is a system built for 1080p gaming and productivity, with the CPU providing a stable foundation and the GPU delivering playable frame rates in most titles at that resolution. It is not a 4K powerhouse, nor is it a high-refresh 1440p machine, but it offers a balanced experience for users who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to adjust game settings. The 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP make it an efficient build, and the AM4 platform offers a clear upgrade path for future CPU improvements. With a launch MSRP of 219 USD for the GPU, this pairing represents a thoughtful midrange choice for mainstream users.