SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and Intel Arc A380E pairing represents a stark imbalance in performance capabilities. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor, sitting at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range, end-of-life component at the 50th percentile. This combination results in a system where the processor’s immense computational power is largely held back by the graphics card in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, making it a specialized workstation tool for CPU-centric workloads rather than a balanced multimedia machine.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database. Because no measured FPS data exists, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The data clearly shows a scenario where the Arc A380E will be the primary determinant of gaming frame rates.

The Intel Arc A380E’s hardware profile places it as an entry-level graphics solution. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, 1024 shading units, and an FP32 compute throughput of 4.096 TFLOPS, its performance in modern titles will be modest. At 1080p with ultra settings, users should expect playable but not high frame rates in most games. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for textures at higher resolutions or in VRAM-heavy titles. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs suggests it is an average performer, not a high-refresh-rate champion.

Given the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking and strong single-core score of 6909 in Cinebench R23, it will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming. However, this advantage will not translate into higher FPS. The Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate are the limiting constraints. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and its 6 GB memory buffer and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause frame rates to drop further. Therefore, while the system can technically play games, the experience will be defined by the GPU's mid-range capabilities, with the CPU sitting largely idle. The estimated FPS for this pairing will be significantly lower than what the Core Ultra 9 285 could support with a more powerful graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents two distinct performance stories. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is an exceptional processor. Its average benchmark score of 75488 places it at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multi-core score of 48945 and a single-core score of 6909, demonstrating immense strength in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. Its PassMark multithread score of 56602 further confirms its high level of multi-core performance.

The processor’s nearest rivals, based on average score, are server and professional-grade chips. It is virtually tied with the AMD EPYC 8224P (score 75582, deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD EPYC 4545P (score 75373, deltaPct 0.2). It also sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755. This places the Core Ultra 9 285 in the same performance tier as multi-threaded workstation and server processors, highlighting its suitability for heavy computational tasks.

In contrast, the Intel Arc A380E has no benchmark scores or nearest rivals listed in the data. Its percentile ranking of 50 indicates it is an average GPU, but without a concrete average score, direct comparisons are impossible. The combined percentile for this build is 73, which is dragged down significantly by the GPU’s mid-range standing. The combined picture is of a system with world-class CPU performance paired with a moderate GPU, resulting in an overall build that is more powerful for CPU-intensive tasks than for graphics-intensive ones.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS of compute power and 6 GB memory are insufficient to drive high refresh rates at 1080p in demanding titles. While the Core Ultra 9 285’s 6909 single-core score in Cinebench R23 is more than capable of handling game logic, the GPU will cap frame rates well below the levels needed for a high-refresh monitor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for software encoding. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 suggests it can handle both game encoding and streaming overhead simultaneously without breaking a sweat. However, the gaming experience being encoded will be limited by the Arc A380E, making this a viable setup only for less demanding or older titles.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case. Video editing software often relies heavily on CPU encoding and effects. The Core Ultra 9 285’s PassMark data compression score of 602121 and floating-point math score of 194988 indicate rapid processing of video files and filters. The Arc A380E can handle hardware acceleration for decoding and some effects, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse, making this a capable editing system.

3D Rendering: This is another excellent scenario for this build. Rendering is a purely CPU-bound task in most engines. The processor’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and PassMark integer math score of 164869 show it can churn through complex render jobs quickly. The GPU’s role in rendering is minimal unless using a GPU-based renderer, where its 4.096 TFLOPS would be a limiting factor.

Software Development: The Core Ultra 9 285 is ideal for developers. Compilation is a heavily multithreaded task, and the CPU’s 24 threads and strong multi-core scores will significantly reduce build times. Its single-core performance of 4881 in PassMark also ensures responsive UI and fast code analysis. The GPU is adequate for standard desktop use and running a multi-monitor setup with its 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for these tasks. The CPU’s immense power will go largely unused in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The Arc A380E is more than sufficient for these tasks, but the system’s overall cost and power are wasted on such light workloads. It would function flawlessly, but it is not a sensible use of the hardware.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis for this system is clear and one-sided. The Intel Arc A380E is the limiting component in almost any graphics-related workload. In gaming, the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and modest specifications (4.096 TFLOPS, 6 GB VRAM) will be the hard limit on frame rates. The CPU’s performance, whether its 48945 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 or its 4881 single-thread score in PassMark, will not be a factor at the resolutions this GPU can handle. The FPS will be constrained by the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Conversely, the CPU is the sole driver of performance in non-graphics tasks. For workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the Arc A380E is largely irrelevant. The Core Ultra 9 285’s 95th percentile ranking and its nearest rival scores (e.g., -0.1% delta from the AMD EPYC 8224P) demonstrate that it is the primary engine for these tasks.

This imbalance means the system’s overall performance is dictated by the workload. For GPU-bound tasks, the system will perform at the level of its GPU. For CPU-bound tasks, the system will perform at the level of its 95th-percentile CPU. There is no scenario where both components are equally stressed, leading to a build that is either severely CPU-limited or GPU-limited depending on the application. The 73rd combined percentile reflects this compromise, pulled down from the CPU's high standing by the GPU's average one.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture and built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. This is a high-core-count chip designed for maximum multi-threaded throughput, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945, which is 95th percentile overall.

The architecture features a substantial cache hierarchy, with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB of L3 cache. This large cache setup helps feed the 24 cores efficiently. Its memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, a feature often critical for workstation stability. The processor also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EUs, providing a basic display output capability even without the discrete GPU.

In real-world workloads, these specifications translate directly into performance. The PassMark multithread score of 56602 and the data encryption score of 46949 show its strength in parallel processing and security-related tasks. The single-core score of 4881 in PassMark indicates that even lightly threaded applications will run with excellent responsiveness. This CPU is a powerhouse for rendering, compiling, and any task that can utilize its 24 threads. Its performance is on par with server-grade AMD EPYC processors, as shown by the nearly identical average scores in the nearest rivals list.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is targeted at professionals and power users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive. Content creators working with 3D rendering or video encoding will find the Core Ultra 9 285’s 48945 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 invaluable for reducing render and export times. Software developers will benefit from the same multi-threaded power for faster code compilation, while the 95th percentile ranking ensures the system can handle the most complex development environments.

The Arc A380E, meanwhile, makes this a less attractive option for gamers. At 1080p, its 6 GB VRAM and 4.096 TFLOPS compute will play older or less demanding titles, but it is not suited for modern AAA games at high settings. Therefore, the target user is not a gamer seeking high frame rates but a professional needing a powerful CPU for a workstation. Students and small business users doing office work would see no benefit from this hardware, as the CPU's immense power would remain idle, making it a poor fit for basic productivity.

The system is best suited for a dedicated workstation where the GPU is used only for basic display output or light acceleration, and the CPU is the primary investment. It is a build for users who prioritize compute performance above all else and do not require high-end graphics capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance bottleneck in this system?

A: The Intel Arc A380E GPU is the clear bottleneck for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. While the CPU is at the 95th percentile, the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, limiting frame rates and graphical detail.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 75488 is virtually identical to the AMD EPYC 8224P (75582, -0.1% delta) and the AMD EPYC 4545P (75373, 0.2% delta), placing it in the same performance tier as these server processors.

Q: Is this a good system for 3D rendering?

A: Yes, this is an excellent system for CPU-based 3D rendering. The Core Ultra 9 285’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 will provide very fast render times.

Q: Can this system handle modern games at high settings?

A: No. The Arc A380E’s 6 GB of VRAM and 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are insufficient for high settings in modern titles. Gaming performance will be limited to lower settings and resolutions.

Q: What is the CPU's memory configuration?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory for improved data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A380E is listed as "End-of-life," with its successor being Battlemage. It was released in early 2024.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 73, which is a compromise between the CPU’s 95th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285 processor with an Intel Arc A380E graphics card. The CPU, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, is a high-end component with a 95th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-range, end-of-life component at the 50th percentile. This creates a system that is fundamentally a high-performance CPU workstation with a basic discrete GPU attached.

The overall tier of this build, as indicated by its combined percentile of 73, is that of a solidly above-average system. However, this tier is heavily skewed by the CPU. The Core Ultra 9 285 is a top-tier processor, but the Arc A380E is a mainstream part. Consequently, the build's identity is that of a compute-focused machine. It is not a balanced gaming or multimedia PC; it is a platform designed to excel in CPU-bound tasks like software development and 3D rendering, where the GPU's limitations are inconsequential.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The Arc A380E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The system’s 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP are low, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W, so the existing power supply likely has ample headroom for future components.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the graphics card. The CPU’s 95th percentile performance is so dominant that it can easily support a much more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Replacing the Arc A380E with a higher-tier graphics card would unlock the system's full gaming and GPU-accelerated compute potential, bringing the overall build performance closer to the CPU's high standing. The platform is also ready for additional storage or expansion cards using the available PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Given the CPU's high performance, it is likely to remain relevant for several years, making a GPU upgrade the single most impactful change to improve this system's overall capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds