SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER — Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Blackwell-based RTX 5080 SUPER graphics card, targeting a desktop build class. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the FACT PACK includes no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements. The CPU and GPU benchmark results are treated as proxies for gaming capability, with the understanding that actual FPS will vary by title, driver, and system configuration.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS values exist for this CPU+GPU pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the available benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and single-core score of 6909 indicate strong per-thread and multi-thread capability, which supports high frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, however, places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs — a surprisingly low standing that suggests frame rates will be modest relative to the CPU's strength.

At 1080p resolution, where CPU overhead often dominates, the Core Ultra 9 285's single-core performance should allow the RTX 5080 SUPER to reach its full potential in most titles. The 6909 Cinebench R23 single-core score is a strong indicator for lightweight game logic and physics threads. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely be high enough for smooth gameplay, but the GPU's percentile position suggests it will not deliver top-tier esports-level numbers.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy scenes, but the 19th percentile GPU score implies that frame rates will be more constrained than at 1080p. Estimates place 1440p ultra performance in the playable range for most AAA titles, though not at the level expected from a card with this memory configuration.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel fill rate are solid figures, but the low percentile ranking relative to other GPUs in the database indicates that 4K ultra settings will likely produce frame rates below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score ensures it will not be the limiting factor at this resolution, but the GPU simply does not have the raw throughput for high-refresh 4K gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 6909 single-core Cinebench R23 score supports high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 19th percentile ranking caps overall FPS. At 1080p, the pairing could sustain refresh rates around 144 Hz in less demanding titles, but at 1440p or 4K, high-refresh monitors would be underutilized.

Streaming: The 24-core, 24-thread configuration provides substantial headroom for encoding and game capture simultaneously. The 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates the CPU can handle software encoding without significantly impacting game performance, while the GPU's 336 tensor cores could offload encoding tasks via NVIDIA's hardware acceleration.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 602121 and floating point math score of 194988 suggest strong performance in codec-heavy workflows. The 24 GB VRAM on the GPU allows for large timelines and effects stacks, while the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth scrubbing and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score is excellent for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate offers acceleration for GPU-renderers. However, the 19th percentile GPU score relative to peers means render times will not be competitive with higher-ranked cards.

Software development: The 24 threads and 164869 Passmark integer math score handle compilation and code analysis efficiently. The 602121 data compression score accelerates build artifact handling, and the 46949 data encryption score supports secure development workflows.

Student and office work: The 4881 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive application usage, while the 56602 multithread score handles multitasking. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw manageable for daily workloads, though the GPU's 415 W TDP makes this a power-hungry build overall.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. This memory capacity is substantial for modern game assets and creative work, but the bandwidth figure is modest relative to other high-end cards. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed.

The Blackwell 2.0 architecture includes 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s are respectable, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 — placing the card at the 19th percentile — indicates that real-world rendering performance lags behind what the specifications suggest.

The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (score 3163, delta -2.8%), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (score 3182, delta -3.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (score 2983, delta 3.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (score 2967, delta 3.6%). This clustering around the 3000-point mark is unexpected for a 50-series card, suggesting either a limited benchmark sample or a driver/architecture quirk that depresses the score.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS provides acceleration for GPU compute, but the low percentile ranking means the card will not outperform more established workstation GPUs. The 24 GB memory is the standout feature, enabling larger scenes and higher resolution textures than cards with less VRAM.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU present a stark imbalance in benchmark percentiles. The Core Ultra 9 285 sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 5080 SUPER sits at only the 19th percentile among GPUs. This 76-point gap indicates that the CPU will heavily outperform the GPU in most workloads.

In gaming, the CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 6909 single-core score provide ample headroom for frame generation and physics simulation. The GPU, however, becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters more than CPU speed. At 1080p, the CPU may occasionally limit FPS in lightly-threaded titles, but at 1440p and above, the GPU's 19th percentile ranking dominates.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's 56602 Passmark multithread score and 194988 floating point math score far exceed what the GPU can deliver in compute tasks. The GPU's 3DMark score of 3075 suggests it is not a compute powerhouse, so rendering and simulation workloads will lean heavily on the CPU.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K would likely show the GPU's influence growing with resolution, but without measured data, this is an estimate. The 24 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being a limiting factor, but the raw compute rate caps performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel access and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC capability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU, though this iGPU is secondary to the discrete GPU.

Benchmark scores show strong multicore performance: Cinebench R15 multicore at 4933, R20 at 20556, and R23 at 48945. Single-core scores are 696 (R15), 2901 (R20), and 6909 (R23). Passmark results include a multithread score of 56602, single-thread of 4881, integer math of 164869, and floating point math of 194988.

The 95th percentile ranking places this CPU among the top 5% of all processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 8224P (avg score 75582, delta -0.1%), AMD EPYC 4545P (avg score 75373, delta 0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (avg score 75716, delta -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (avg score 75738, delta -0.3%). These deltas are all within 0.3%, indicating the Core Ultra 9 285 is performance-equivalent to these server and prosumer chips.

For real workloads, the 24 threads handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering with ease. The 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for data-dense applications.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but can accept a GPU that ranks modestly. Gamers at 1080p will see the CPU's strength translate into high frame rates, though 1440p and 4K users will find the GPU limiting. The 24 GB VRAM suits modded games and high-resolution texture packs, but the low GPU percentile means frame rates will not rival higher-ranked cards.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 24 GB memory for previewing large projects. The 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate provides some GPU acceleration, but it is not a primary compute card.

Software developers will appreciate the 24 threads and 164869 integer math score for compilation, while the 602121 data compression score speeds up build and deployment tasks. Students and office users will find the CPU overkill for basic tasks, but the 65 W TDP keeps idle power reasonable.

Small business workstations handling data analysis or virtualization could leverage the 24 cores and ECC memory support, though the GPU's 415 W TDP requires adequate cooling and power delivery.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75488, placing it at the 95th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75582 (delta -0.1%), meaning the Intel chip is essentially tied with a server-class EPYC processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75716 (delta -0.3%), and the Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738 (delta -0.3%), all within statistical noise.

The RTX 5080 SUPER achieves an average benchmark score of 3075, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Quadro P1000 (3163, delta -2.8%), Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182, delta -3.4%), GeForce 820A (2983, delta 3.1%), and GeForce GTX 860M (2967, delta 3.6%). These are all older or lower-end cards, which is a surprising comparison for a 50-series product.

The combined percentile for this build is 57, reflecting the wide gap between the CPU's top-tier standing and the GPU's below-average position. The CPU contributes the bulk of the compute power, while the GPU's 3DMark score of 3075 drags the overall gaming potential down.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture, supporting DDR5 memory via dual-channel configuration. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion, and the 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for future CPU upgrades within the same socket.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is forward-compatible with newer motherboards. The 415 W TDP requires a robust power supply; while the suggested PSU is not specified in the data, the 1x 16-pin power connector indicates a modern PSU with adequate wattage is necessary. The dual-slot design and 304 mm length fit standard mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-ranked card to balance the system. The CPU's 95th percentile performance will not bottleneck any GPU available, so users can pair it with a stronger graphics card without concern. The 24 GB VRAM on the current GPU is generous, but the low compute rate means a GPU with higher benchmark scores would improve gaming and rendering performance.

Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 kits would benefit the CPU's 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and adding PCIe Gen 5 NVMe storage would leverage the CPU's lane count for faster load times.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 285 support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so users cannot adjust clock multipliers beyond the factory boost of 5.60 GHz.

Q: What memory type does this build use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC support.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5080 SUPER have?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 uses Intel Socket 1851, part of the Arrow Lake architecture, with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What are the GPU's display outputs?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 75488 is within 0.3% of the AMD EPYC 8224P (75582), EPYC 4545P (75373), Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75716), and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75738), making it effectively tied with these processors.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 57, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile position and the GPU's 19th percentile position.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a 95th percentile CPU ranking, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 GPU with 24 GB GDDR7 memory and a 19th percentile GPU ranking. The combined percentile of 57 places this system in the middle of the database, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strength.

The CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 6909 single-core score make it a top-tier processor for productivity and gaming alike. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075, however, positions it below most modern discrete graphics cards, making this a CPU-centric build where the processor outshines the graphics component. Users seeking balanced performance should consider a higher-ranked GPU, while those prioritizing compute and multitasking will find the CPU delivers exceptional value at its performance level.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds