SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a modern desktop combination built around Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture and the Battlemage GPU generation. With the CPU holding a 94th percentile rank against all processors and the GPU at the 68th percentile, this system targets users who prioritize multi-threaded compute and high-refresh 1080p gaming. The combined percentile for the pair is 81, and measured average FPS across the test suite is 100.4 frames per second, placing it at rank 2730 out of 3732 pairs. This is a configuration with clear strengths in productivity and competitive gaming, but with notable limitations at higher resolutions and in the most demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build is exceptionally strong. Measured FPS in esports titles shows triple-digit performance: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 150 FPS, Valorant at 340 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 192 FPS. These figures support a smooth experience on 144Hz and even 240Hz displays, provided the user stays at 1920x1080 resolution. The CPU’s single-core score of 2020 in Cinebench R23 and 2713 in Geekbench single-core ensures that frame pacing in these CPU-bound titles remains consistent.

Streaming while gaming is a viable workload for this pairing. The CPU’s 20 threads and a PassMark multithread score of 58594 provide ample headroom for encoding overhead. The GPU’s dedicated hardware, while not specified in the pack, is part of the Xe2-HPG architecture, and the 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth helps maintain frame buffers during simultaneous capture. The measured 1080p FPS in Warzone at 192 and Counter-Strike 2 at 150 suggests that even with a 10-15% encoding hit, playable frame rates remain achievable.

Video editing workflows benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core performance. A Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 places this processor 1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. PassMark integer math at 143242 and floating-point math at 189629 indicate solid number-crunching for codecs and effects. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, though the 68th percentile GPU rank means it is not a top-tier renderer.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will rely heavily on the CPU. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20918 and R15 multicore score of 5020 are strong indicators of ray-traced CPU rendering performance. The GPU can assist with viewport and final-frame rendering via its 20 RT cores, but its PassMark G3D score of 15748 and percentile rank of 68 suggest it is mid-pack for GPU rendering. Users should expect the CPU to be the primary rendering engine, with the GPU handling lighter loads.

Software development is a natural fit given the CPU’s thread count and cache hierarchy. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for frequently accessed code. PassMark data compression score of 665554 and encryption score of 48246 indicate fast build tooling and secure compilation. The GPU’s Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide compatibility with graphics debugging tools, while the 20 CPU lanes of PCIe Gen 5 allow for fast NVMe storage access.

Student and office workloads are more than adequately served. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2713 and PassMark single-thread score of 4928, ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet responsiveness. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can handle basic display output, though the discrete B580 is present for any light gaming or media tasks. For office productivity, this pairing is overkill, but the headroom means no slowdowns will occur during multitasking.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is marked as true for dataIsMeasured, reveals a clear pattern across the 47 games tested. At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the average frame rate is 100.4 FPS across all games. This is a strong result, but the variance is substantial. Esports and older titles reach very high numbers: Valorant hits 340 FPS, CS:GO reaches 329.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 192 FPS. Newer or more demanding titles drop significantly: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 44.3 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 22.8 FPS, and The Medium at 31 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS across games drops to roughly 60-70% of the 1080p figures. Counter-Strike 2 falls to 99 FPS, Valorant to 290.6 FPS, and Warzone to 171 FPS. More demanding titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 32.8 FPS, Ark to 14.1 FPS, and Fortnite to 42.5 FPS. This resolution is still playable for competitive shooters but not for AAA titles at ultra settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Valorant remains playable at 228.9 FPS, but most titles fall below 60 FPS. Warzone is an outlier at 144 FPS, likely due to its scalability. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 20.4 FPS, Ark at 5.1 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone’s 144 FPS is the exception rather than the rule. The 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K ultra textures in many modern titles, as evidenced by the sub-30 FPS results in several games.

The GPU’s nearest rivals provide context for its performance. The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and 0.7% below the RTX 3080. This places it in the same performance class as those older high-end cards, but with modern features like DirectX 12 Ultimate and hardware ray tracing. The measured FPS data confirms this positioning: it can handle 1080p ultra in most games but struggles with 1440p ultra in the newest titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35850 multicore and 2020 single-core. The multicore result places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70879. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6511P, scores 71051, which is only 0.2% higher. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 0.7% higher, while the i7-14700KF is 1% lower. This indicates the 265K sits at the top of the mid-range desktop heap, trading blows with server-class Xeons.

The GPU’s benchmark results show a more modest standing. Its PassMark G3D score is 15748, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 109672. The average benchmark score of 23021 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which is 0.2% higher, and the RTX 2080, which is 0.6% lower. The RTX 3080 is 0.7% higher. This confirms the B580 is a mid-range part that matches older high-end cards but does not approach current top-tier GPUs.

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU. The CPU’s 94th percentile vs. the GPU’s 68th percentile creates a 26-point gap. In compute-heavy tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will dominate. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The pair’s combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance, sitting between the two individual percentiles.

The pair’s average FPS across all games is 100.4, with a rank of 2730 out of 3732 pairs. This means that while the absolute frame rate is high, many other CPU-GPU pairs achieve higher averages. The high CPU percentile does not translate to top-tier gaming performance because the GPU holds the system back in demanding titles. For productivity, the CPU’s 35850 Cinebench R23 score is exceptional, but for gaming, the B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 is the ceiling.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience is a gamer who plays competitive esports titles at 1080p. With Valorant at 340 FPS, CS:GO at 329.9 FPS, and Warzone at 192 FPS, this system delivers the high frame rates needed for competitive play. The user should have a 144Hz or 240Hz 1080p monitor to take advantage of these numbers. At 1440p, the system is still viable for esports, with Valorant at 290.6 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 99 FPS, but AAA games will require lower settings.

Content creators who prioritize CPU-bound workloads will find this build appealing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 and Geekbench multicore score of 23085 make video encoding, batch photo processing, and software compilation fast. The 20 threads handle concurrent tasks well, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces data bottlenecks. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is useful for previewing 4K timelines, though rendering will be CPU-heavy.

Software developers and data analysts are another target group. The PassMark data compression score of 665554 indicates fast database operations, and the encryption score of 48246 supports secure data handling. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for high-speed storage, which reduces build times. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running computation where data integrity is critical.

Small business workstations that run virtualization or heavy spreadsheet models will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and 94th percentile rank. The system can handle multiple VMs or large datasets without stuttering. The GPU is not necessary for these tasks, but its presence allows for occasional CAD or video work. The 125W TDP is manageable for standard office power supplies, and the 450W suggested PSU is modest.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming workloads. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance allows the GPU to reach its limits in many titles, but the GPU’s 68th percentile rank caps performance. This is visible in Cyberpunk 2077 at 44.3 FPS and Ark at 22.8 FPS, where the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates despite the CPU’s power. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes more severe, with frame rates dropping by 30-50% and 60-80% respectively.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance reverses. The CPU’s 94th percentile rank means it can handle almost any multi-threaded task without issue. The GPU is not involved in these tasks, so its lower percentile is irrelevant. The PassMark multithread score of 58594 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 35850 indicate that the CPU will not be the limiter in rendering, encoding, or compilation.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms the GPU bottleneck. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, FPS drops from 150 at 1080p to 99 at 1440p to 56 at 4K. This is a GPU-driven decline, not a CPU one. In contrast, the CPU’s single-core score remains constant regardless of resolution. The measured data shows that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s and 192-bit bus width are insufficient for 4K ultra textures, leading to the sub-30 FPS results in many titles.

For a balanced upgrade, the user should first replace the GPU. A GPU with a higher percentile rank would allow the CPU to stretch its legs in gaming. The CPU has headroom, as evidenced by its 1% advantage over the i7-14700KF, which is often paired with more powerful GPUs. The current GPU is the limiting factor in all gaming scenarios above 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 interface, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2. This socket supports the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3nm process node from TSMC. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a desktop part and valuable for error-sensitive workloads.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU and a fast NVMe SSD. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The motherboard should have at least one PCIe 5.0 x16 slot for future GPU upgrades. The 125W TDP of the CPU and 190W TDP of the GPU suggest a 450W PSU is sufficient, but a higher-wattage unit would provide headroom for a future GPU upgrade.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. This is useful for troubleshooting or basic office work. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, though the 3.90 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost clocks are already high.

A sensible next upgrade is a more powerful GPU. The CPU has the headroom to support a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher, based on its 94th percentile rank. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 125W TDP allow for this without changing the platform. Memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 modules, though the dual-channel configuration limits bandwidth to 102.4 GB/s.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The 125W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, indicating good efficiency. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 is 1% higher than the i7-14700KF and 1.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 9700F. The Geekbench multicore score of 23085 and PassMark multithread score of 58594 confirm this. The single-core performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2020 and Geekbench single-core of 2713.

The PassMark sub-tests reveal specific strengths. Data compression at 665554 indicates fast archiving and database operations. Floating-point math at 189629 and integer math at 143242 show balanced ALU and FPU performance. Random string sorting at 79752 and extended instructions at 54333 are useful for encryption and scientific computing. The find prime numbers score of 491 is low, but this is a single-threaded test.

The 94th percentile rank places this CPU among the top 6% of all processors. Its nearest rivals include server-class Xeons, which are more expensive and power-hungry. This makes the 265K a high-value option for desktop users who need server-like compute without the platform costs. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die indicate a dense, efficient design.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a launch MSRP of $394.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The 265K scores 35850 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 1% higher than the i7-14700KF’s score.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games at 1080p?

A: The average FPS across all tested games at 1920x1080 is 100.4 frames per second.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports ECC memory in addition to standard DDR5.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B580 is in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 23021.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc B580 is 450 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 190W TDP and the CPU’s 125W TDP.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and manufactured on a 5nm process by TSMC. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The chip contains 20 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, but no tensor cores are listed. The GPU runs at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem is a 12 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but limits 4K performance, as seen in the measured FPS drops at 3840x2160. The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 68th percentile. The PassMark G3D score of 15748 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 are mid-range figures. The nearest rivals include the RTX 2080 (0.6% lower) and RTX 3080 (0.7% higher), indicating the B580 matches older high-end cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 confirms modern API support.

The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is a key advantage over older 8 GB cards, allowing higher texture settings in modern games. However, the 192-bit bus limits bandwidth compared to 256-bit or wider alternatives. The RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 means ray tracing will be performance-expensive, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077’s 44.3 FPS at 1080p.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with the Intel Arc B580. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake part with a 94th percentile rank, while the GPU is a Battlemage-class part with a 68th percentile rank. The combined percentile is 81, indicating a system that is above average but not top-tier.

The CPU is the star of this build. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35850 and Geekbench multicore of 23085 make it excellent for productivity. The GPU is capable for 1080p gaming, with an average of 100.4 FPS across all tested games at that resolution. At 1440p, it drops to roughly 60-70 FPS average, and at 4K, it struggles to maintain 60 FPS in most titles.

The overall tier is mid-range to upper-mid-range. The CPU can compete with server-class parts, while the GPU matches older high-end cards like the RTX 2080. The pair’s rank of 2730 out of 3732 pairs indicates that many other configurations offer higher average FPS, but few offer the same CPU compute power at this price point. This build is best suited for users who need CPU-heavy performance and play esports at 1080p, with the option to upgrade the GPU later for more demanding gaming.