SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation and operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The chip integrates 30 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2 per core, and its 17,800 million transistors occupy a 243 mm² die. This is a locked multiplier part, meaning overclocking is not enabled, and it carries a 65 W TDP.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 93rd percentile among all processors, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of desktop chips. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 42,216, while the single-core score is 5,960. These numbers translate to strong throughput for heavily threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, while the single-core performance supports snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark multithread score of 49,682 reinforces the CPU's capability in multi-threaded scenarios, and the single-thread score of 4,689 confirms a solid foundation for single-core-bound software.

The data compression score of 522,983 and data encryption score of 40,456 in PassMark suggest that archiving and encryption tasks will complete quickly, which is relevant for developers and analysts handling large datasets. Floating-point math scores of 172,776 and integer math scores of 134,773 indicate robust number-crunching for scientific or financial simulations. Extended instructions score of 41,478 shows the CPU handles advanced instruction sets effectively, while the random string sorting score of 63,833 reflects strong performance in sorting and database-style operations.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 265 sits within a tight band. The AMD EPYC 4464P averages 64,823, which is 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F averages 64,438, 0.3% lower. The AMD EPYC 7343 averages 64,202 (0.7% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9124 averages 65,104 (0.7% higher). These deltas are minimal, meaning the 265 offers effectively comparable aggregate performance to several enterprise-grade processors, but with a desktop-focused platform.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data from ultra settings across a broad game library shows this pairing is capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming but begins to struggle at higher resolutions. The average FPS across all tested games is 106.5, which places this pair at rank 2,488 out of 3,861 pairs, a position roughly in the upper third of all CPU+GPU combinations.

At 1920x1080, esports titles run exceptionally well. Valorant reaches 375 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 361, and Rainbow Six Siege achieves 194. Call of Duty: Warzone posts 183 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 delivers 163. Roblox runs at 211 FPS, and Barony reaches 138. These figures support competitive play on high-refresh monitors.

AAA games at 1080p show a mixed picture. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 48 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44, and The Medium at 34, indicating that the most demanding titles will require settings reductions or upscaling to hit smooth frame rates. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly heavy at just 24 FPS. Lighter titles like Assetto Corsa (97 FPS), Doom (122), and Minecraft (161) run comfortably.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop noticeably. Valorant still provides 320 FPS, and CS:GO manages 249. Warzone runs at 162, and Counter-Strike 2 at 108. However, Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 36 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 33, and The Medium to 29. Many games sit in the 40-60 FPS range, such as Fortnite (50), Grand Theft Auto V (50), and Palworld (50), which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh displays.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 5050's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus become limiting factors. Valorant still reaches 256 FPS, and Warzone manages 138. But most titles drop below 40 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 (24), Ark (8), Red Dead Redemption 2 (22), and The Medium (23). The data clearly shows that 4K ultra gaming is not a strength of this configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265 uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This socket currently supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family, and given the production status is active, future upgrades within the same generation are plausible. The chip supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. This is a desktop-class build, so users have full flexibility in choosing memory speeds and capacities that the motherboard supports.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU with Gen 5 and 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-speed graphics card and one or two Gen 5 NVMe drives. The RTX 5050 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which aligns well with the available lanes and will not bottleneck the GPU's data transfer. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units provides a basic display output capability, which is useful for troubleshooting or light tasks without the discrete GPU.

The GPU has a 130 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. This is a modest requirement, meaning most standard desktop power supplies will have ample headroom. The CPU's 65 W TDP adds to the total, but the combined draw is well within mainstream PSU capabilities. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU in the GeForce 50-series family, as the CPU's 93rd percentile performance suggests it would not bottleneck a faster card for gaming. The CPU's strong multicore scores also make it suitable for pairing with higher-end workstation GPUs if compute workloads are the priority.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is skewed toward the processor. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. This disparity indicates that the Core Ultra 7 265 is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the RTX 5050 is relative to its own class. In gaming workloads, the GPU is almost certainly the primary limiter, especially at higher resolutions where the pixel throughput and memory bandwidth of the RTX 5050 are taxed.

Evidence from FPS scaling supports this. At 1080p, many games show high frame rates, but the most demanding titles drop sharply, which is characteristic of a GPU that cannot maintain fill rates. At 1440p and 4K, the frame rate declines are steep across all titles, confirming that the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are the bottleneck. The GPU's pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are moderate, and the FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS is not exceptional for modern AAA titles.

The CPU, by contrast, has headroom. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,216 and PassMark multithread score of 49,682 suggest it can handle far more demanding graphics cards without becoming the limiting factor. In CPU-bound scenarios such as esports at low resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,689 in PassMark ensures high frame rates are achievable, as seen with Valorant at 375 FPS. But in GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions, the RTX 5050 will cap performance regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from synthetic benchmarks is clear: this is a CPU-heavy pairing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 achieves an average benchmark score of 64,640, placing it at the 93rd percentile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21,035, placing it at the 66th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 80, which reflects the stronger CPU pulling the average up.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 4,255 multicore and 600 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 6,268 multicore and 884 single-core. Cinebench R23 results are 42,216 multicore and 5,960 single-core. These scores indicate consistent scaling across Cinebench versions, with the multicore advantage being the dominant trait. PassMark results further detail the CPU's strengths: floating-point math at 172,776, integer math at 134,773, and extended instructions at 41,478. The find prime numbers score of 418 is notably lower, suggesting that certain specialized workloads may not perform as well.

For the GPU, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,502. Geekbench OpenCL score is 90,334, and Vulkan score is 89,381. PassMark G3D score is 17,326, with a G2D score of 1,113. The GPU compute score of 9,184 indicates moderate compute capability. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 103, 150, and 66 respectively, which are relatively low and suggest that the GPU is not optimized for compute-heavy DX12 workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals show it is closely matched with several older or mobile parts. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL averages 21,153 (0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M averages 21,237 (1% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT averages 20,713 (1.6% lower). The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile averages 21,379 (1.6% higher). These small deltas indicate the RTX 5050 performs at a level similar to these parts, which are not modern high-end GPUs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build excels in esports. Valorant at 375 FPS, CS:GO at 361, and Rainbow Six Siege at 194 easily drive 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. Warzone at 183 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 163 also clear the high-refresh bar. Casual titles like Roblox (211) and Barony (138) are also smooth.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and strong multicore scores (Cinebench R23 42,216) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's 80 tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding, but the low PassMark G3D score of 17,326 suggests the CPU is the better choice for x264 or x265 encoding workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 49,682 and data compression score of 522,983 indicate that video editing software will render timelines and export files quickly. The GPU's moderate compute score of 9,184 may help with effects but is not a primary strength.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,216 is strong for CPU-based rendering. For GPU-based renderers, the RTX 5050's FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS is modest, so expect slower GPU-accelerated renders compared to higher-tier cards.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 134,773 and random string sorting score of 63,833 support fast compilation and code analysis. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4,689 ensures responsive IDE interaction.

Student and office work: The CPU's 93rd percentile performance handles spreadsheets, documents, and multitasking with ease. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provide a fallback display option. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw low, making this an efficient system for daily use.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p with competitive titles will find the frame rates compelling, particularly for esports where the CPU drives high FPS. Those who occasionally play AAA games at 1080p will need to accept settings compromises, as Cyberpunk 2077 at 48 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS require tweaks.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data processing will benefit from the 20 cores and high multicore scores. Programmers and software developers who compile large codebases will see strong performance from the integer math and sorting benchmarks. Students and small business users who need a responsive system for office productivity, web browsing, and light media creation will find the CPU more than adequate.

The GPU, while not top-tier, handles less demanding games well. Titles like Assetto Corsa, Minecraft, and Dave The Diver run at high frame rates at 1080p. Users who play these types of games or who do not prioritize 4K gaming will find the RTX 5050 sufficient. However, users targeting 1440p or 4K gaming with maximum settings will be disappointed and should consider a higher-tier GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake-S processor on Socket 1851, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture chip with 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The combined percentile rank is 80, indicating this system sits above the majority of all possible CPU+GPU combinations.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor, while the GPU's 66th percentile ranking is more mid-range. This creates a lopsided configuration where the processor is the star. The pair's average FPS across games is 106.5, which is respectable for 1080p gaming. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $394, and the GPU is $249 USD.

This build is best described as a productivity-first system with gaming capability. The CPU's strong multicore performance and low 65 W TDP make it an efficient choice for workstation tasks, while the GPU provides entry-level to mid-range gaming performance. It is a versatile desktop that handles most workloads well but will not excel at high-resolution gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile rank is 80, meaning this system performs better than 80% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average benchmark score of 64,823, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 7 265's average score of 64,640. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the RTX 5050's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

Q: Can this build handle 4K gaming?

A: The measured FPS data shows that most games run below 40 FPS at 3840x2160 with ultra settings. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22 FPS, so 4K gaming is not practical.

Q: What socket does the Core Ultra 7 265 use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Arrow Lake-S architecture. It is a desktop-class socket.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5050 is 300 W, which is a modest requirement given the GPU's 130 W TDP.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RX 5600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20,713, which is 1.6% lower than the RTX 5050's average score of 21,035. The RTX 5050 is slightly faster.