SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a modern desktop combination built around Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture and the Battlemage GPU generation. This analysis draws exclusively on benchmark data to characterize the CPU’s compute capabilities, the GPU’s rendering throughput, and how the two interact across a range of gaming and productivity workloads. The combined percentile of 79 places this build above the majority of tested desktop configurations, though the specific strengths and limitations are best understood through the individual component scores and measured frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, within a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is relevant for high-bandwidth storage and expansion.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded showing, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and a single-core score of 5,960. The R20 multi-core score is 6,268, while the single-core is 884. In the older R15 test, the CPU scores 4,255 multi-core and 600 single-core. PassMark results further detail the workload profile: multi-thread score of 49,682, single-thread score of 4,689, integer math at 134,773, floating-point math at 172,776, and data compression at 522,983. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 64,640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tested.

Against its nearest rivals, the Ultra 7 265 sits within a narrow band. It is 0.3% slower than the AMD EPYC 4464P (average score 64,823) and 0.7% slower than the AMD EPYC 9124 (65,104). Conversely, it is 0.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (64,438) and 0.7% faster than the AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202). These deltas are small, indicating that the 265 performs essentially at parity with these enterprise-class parts in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a mainstream desktop chip.

For real workloads, the 20-thread configuration combined with a 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache suggests strong parallel scaling for rendering, compilation, and data processing tasks. The single-thread score of 5,960 in R23 indicates good responsiveness for lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark encryption score of 40,456 and extended instructions score of 41,478 reflect capable throughput for security-related tasks and vectorized code. The data suggests this CPU handles both heavy multi-core productivity and fast single-threaded operations without significant compromise, though its 65 W TDP implies thermal constraints are less severe than higher-wattage parts.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data from ultra settings across a wide range of games reveals a clear resolution-dependent pattern. At 1920x1080, the Intel Arc B570 delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Valorant hits 304 FPS, CS:GO reaches 293 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 183 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS. These numbers indicate a strong 1080p experience for competitive gaming.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Valorant still runs at 259 FPS, CS:GO at 201 FPS, and Warzone at 162 FPS. Rainbow Six Siege drops to 103 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 falls to 88 FPS. The 1440p results remain playable for fast-paced titles, though the gap between 1080p and 1440p is noticeable.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles with demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a mere 6 FPS. The Medium is also low at 18 FPS. These results indicate that 4K ultra settings are not viable for modern AAA games with this GPU. However, lighter titles fare better: Valorant hits 207 FPS, Roblox 65 FPS, and CS:GO 119 FPS at 4K.

The data shows a mixed picture for 1440p gaming across genres. Control runs at 42 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 39 FPS, and Fortnite at 40 FPS, which are borderline for smooth play. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (29 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (27 FPS) suggest that 1440p ultra is only playable with reduced settings or upscaling. The overall average FPS across all tested games is 87.1, with this pairing ranking 3013 out of 3732 pairs, indicating it is below the median for combined CPU+GPU performance in gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 64,640 places it in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 20,556 places it in the 65th percentile. This discrepancy highlights a CPU-heavy build where the processor outpaces the graphics card in relative performance. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,649, and its Geekbench scores are 83,514 (OpenCL) and 96,844 (Vulkan). PassMark GPU tests show a G3D score of 14,195 and a G2D score of 661.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (average score 20,534, 0.1% higher) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582, 0.1% higher). It also sits near the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, 0.4% lower) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, 0.5% higher). This places the B570 in the same performance tier as these older or mobile parts, suggesting its compute capabilities are roughly equivalent to a mid-range GPU from a previous generation.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU ranks near the top of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the upper-middle of all graphics cards. This means the CPU can feed the GPU without bottlenecking in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will limit frame rates in GPU-bound workloads. The pair’s combined percentile of 79 reflects this CPU-dominant configuration.

Who Should Build It

This combination suits users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over high-end gaming. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, content creators rendering video, and professionals running data analysis or virtualization workloads. The 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 30 MB L3 cache, provide ample parallel processing headroom for these tasks.

Gamers at 1080p will find this build capable for esports and lighter titles, as evidenced by the high frame rates in Valorant, CS:GO, and Warzone at that resolution. Those targeting 1440p should expect playable but not consistently high frame rates in demanding games, with many AAA titles hovering around 40-55 FPS. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth support moderate texture loads, but 4K gaming is not recommended given the low FPS in most titles.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance for office applications and the efficient 65 W TDP, which allows for compact cooling solutions. The lack of ECC memory support may be a consideration for mission-critical server applications, but for general productivity, this build is well-suited. The CPU’s integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU can serve as a fallback display output, though the discrete B570 is the primary GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) generation. This socket supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The platform does not support ECC memory, which limits its use in error-critical environments.

For the GPU, the Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs but may limit future upgrades to higher-end GPUs that benefit from x16 lanes. The GPU’s TDP is 150 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W, leaving headroom for a more power-hungry graphics card later. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means the platform’s power delivery is not stressed, allowing for a wider range of PSU choices.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc B570 with a higher-tier GPU if gaming performance becomes a priority, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking ensures it would not likely bottleneck a faster graphics card. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and PCIe Gen 5 support provide a solid foundation for such an upgrade. The socket 1851 platform is not forward-compatible with other Intel generations, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but the current CPU is already near the top of its class.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the build delivers over 100 FPS in several titles, including Valorant (304), CS:GO (293), and Roblox (171). This makes it suitable for 144Hz monitors in esports, though 1440p performance drops to 88-103 FPS in similar games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (42,216 in R23) can handle encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s moderate performance may limit game settings. At 1080p, Warzone runs at 183 FPS, leaving headroom for encoding overhead.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 172,776 and multi-thread score of 49,682 indicate effective processing for render tasks. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking provides hardware acceleration for effects, though the 10 GB VRAM may be limiting for large timelines.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 suggests capable CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports GPU-accelerated renderers. The 18 RT cores and 2304 shading units provide a moderate RT workload capability.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,689 in PassMark and 5,960 in R23 ensures fast compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 20 cores accelerate parallel builds. The data compression score of 522,983 aids in large repository operations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking and 65 W TDP make it efficient for everyday tasks, with the integrated GPU serving as a backup. The low power draw allows for quiet operation, and the 20-thread count handles multitasking without slowdown.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.3% slower than the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.7% slower than the AMD EPYC 9124, but 0.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and 0.7% faster than the AMD EPYC 7343.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU good for 4K gaming?

A: No, measured FPS at 3840x2160 ultra settings are low, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 19 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, though lighter titles like Valorant reach 207 FPS.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 79, with the CPU at 93 and the GPU at 65.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the memory support is DDR5 without ECC functionality.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 150 W and the CPU’s TDP is 65 W.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, while the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with 2304 shading units and 10 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 64,640 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s score of 20,556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 79, indicating an overall above-average system, though the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

The build’s class is desktop, and its tier is defined by the CPU’s near-top-tier performance and the GPU’s mid-range standing. The measured FPS data shows strong 1080p gaming capability but diminishing returns at higher resolutions. The average FPS across all tested games is 87.1, with the pair ranking 3013 out of 3732, placing it below the median for gaming performance. This is a system where the CPU outshines the GPU, making it better suited for productivity than for high-end gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is clear from the percentile difference: the CPU at 93rd percentile versus the GPU at 65th percentile means the GPU is the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads. In gaming, this manifests as frame rates that are lower than what the CPU could otherwise support. For example, at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (5,960 in R23) can feed the GPU effectively in esports titles, resulting in high FPS. However, in demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS at 1080p) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (36 FPS at 1080p), the GPU’s rendering throughput is the constraint.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as data compression (522,983 PassMark score) or multi-threaded rendering, the GPU plays a minimal role, so the CPU’s performance dominates. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent drop of roughly 30-40% across most games, which is typical for a GPU-limited scenario. At 4K, the drop is even more severe, confirming the GPU is the primary bottleneck for high-resolution gaming. Upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant gaming performance gains, while the CPU would remain sufficient for several more years.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) using a 5 nm TSMC process, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 18 RT cores. The base and boost clocks are both 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 and Geekbench scores of 83,514 (OpenCL) and 96,844 (Vulkan). PassMark G3D score is 14,195, and GPU compute is 7,281. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 20,556 places it in the 65th percentile, with nearest rivals being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher) and Intel Arc A750 (0.1% higher). These scores indicate the B570 performs at the level of a mid-range GPU from a previous generation, sufficient for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but not for high-end 4K rendering.

The 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most games at 1080p and 1440p with moderate texture settings. The 18 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low FPS in RT-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (29 FPS at 1440p) suggests RT performance is limited. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. For rendering workloads, the 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance is usable for GPU-accelerated tasks, though it lags behind higher-tier cards. The GPU’s 150 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU make it a manageable component for most desktop systems.