SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F paired with the Intel Arc A380E is an unusual desktop combination: a flagship-tier, twenty-four-core Raptor Lake Refresh processor anchored to an entry-level, single-slot Arc graphics card. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile against all tracked processors, while the GPU occupies the 50th percentile, producing a combined build percentile of 71. That gap defines everything about this system. It is compute-rich and graphics-moderate, a profile better suited to productivity than high-fidelity gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread part built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The die measures 257 mm². Base clock sits at 2.00 GHz with a boost ceiling of 5.80 GHz — a wide operating range typical of a hybrid design that pairs strong single-thread burst behavior with heavy multi-thread throughput. The rated TDP is 65 W, which is notably conservative for a chip of this class and reflects Intel's base-power rating rather than sustained load behavior.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB slab of L3. That last figure matters most for gaming and latency-sensitive productivity work, because it feeds all cores from a common pool and reduces trips to main memory. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and ECC is supported — a feature that pushes this chip toward workstation territory despite its desktop segmentation.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that is genuinely elite in both dimensions. Cinebench R23 returns 39,551 points multi-core and 5,583 points single-core; R20 posts 16,611 and 2,344; R15 records 3,986 and 562. The single-core figures are the headline: very few parts in the database sustain that level of per-thread performance, which translates directly into snappy application launches, responsive compilation, and strong performance in software that never parallelizes. Geekbench echoes the picture with 2,570 single-core and 20,008 multi-core points, and Passmark reports 4,506 single-thread and 46,532 multi-thread scores.

Against its nearest rivals the i9-14900F is effectively dead-even. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX averages 60,099 against this chip's 60,008 average benchmark score — a delta of just -0.2 percent. The Ryzen 7 8745HX is similarly level at 60,104 (-0.2 percent), the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D trails slightly at 59,641 (+0.6 percent in this chip's favor), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T leads marginally at 60,572 (-0.9 percent). In practical terms, buyers choosing between these parts are choosing platform features, not throughput. Note also that the multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited to other levers.

For real workloads, the numbers say this: video encoding, code compilation, 3D rendering, and heavy multitasking all land in the top decile of the database, while lightly threaded applications still run near the very top of the field thanks to the 5.80 GHz boost.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's percentile placement is 92 against all tracked processors, with an average benchmark score of 60,008 across its recorded suite. That placement is consistent across test families rather than being carried by one outlier: Cinebench multi-core scales from 3,986 in R15 to 39,551 in R23, and the Passmark suite shows the same breadth — 177,066 in integer math, 119,550 in floating point, 564,207 in data compression, 34,644 in encryption, 63,728 in string sorting, and 31,084 in extended instructions. Physics lands at 2,899 and prime-number finding at 209, both consistent with a top-tier consumer part.

The GPU side is much thinner on data: the Arc A380E has no recorded benchmark scores in this pack (avgBenchmarkScore is zero), but its percentile placement against all GPUs is 50 — the exact middle of the distribution. That is the defining contrast of this build. A 92nd-percentile CPU feeding a 50th-percentile GPU produces a combined percentile of 71, and that combined figure is best read as "strong compute platform with mid-range graphics," not as a balanced gaming system.

The overall picture is asymmetric performance. Any workload that lives on the CPU — rendering in a CPU-based engine, simulation, software compilation — performs at flagship level. Any workload that lives on the GPU performs at the median of the field.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A380E is an Alchemist-generation Xe-HPG part, the DG2-128 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, giving a density of 45.9M transistors per mm². The specification sheet describes a compact, efficient design: 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, and 8 ray-tracing cores. There are no dedicated tensor cores listed.

Raw throughput figures are modest. FP32 compute is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS in a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. Clocks run at 2,000 MHz base and 2,000 MHz boost — a flat curve, meaning the card does not chase boost bins above its nominal frequency. Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a narrow 96-bit bus, clocked at 1,937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), yielding 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth and capacity are the card's principal constraints for rendering: modern scene data and high-resolution textures will exceed 6 GB quickly, and 186 GB/s is a fraction of what enthusiast cards command.

The feature set is more forward-looking than the performance. The A380E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with hardware ray tracing via its 8 RT cores. Four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs are generous for a card of this class and enable multi-monitor productivity arrays. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The 50th-percentile GPU ranking, interpreted for rendering, means mid-field rasterization performance and entry-level ray tracing. Real-time viewport work and 1080p rendering are the realistic envelope; heavy GPU rendering, path tracing, and 4K texture workloads will exceed the card's memory and compute. The card is also marked end-of-life, superseded by Battlemage — relevant for anyone planning long-term driver and feature support.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build is bottlenecked by its GPU in every graphics-bound scenario, and the data makes that unambiguous. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile; the GPU at the 50th. A combined percentile of 71 does not split the difference — it describes a system whose ceiling is set by whichever component a given workload favors. In games, that will almost always be the Arc A380E: no CPU, however fast, can render frames the GPU cannot produce, and a 5.80 GHz boost clock with 36 MB of L3 will simply idle between frames at higher resolutions.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads the A380E is irrelevant. Compilation, physics simulation, batch encoding on the CPU, and multi-threaded rendering in Cinebench-class engines will hit the full 24-core, 32-thread capability. Passmark physics (2,899) and multi-thread (46,532) scores confirm there is compute headroom to spare.

One important note on data quality: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, and the data is flagged as not measured. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile placements, not from recorded gameplay.

The practical implication for a builder: at lower resolutions and higher graphics settings, the GPU is the limit; raising resolution or quality settings will not change that. The CPU will only become the constraint if the GPU is upgraded substantially.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-14900F compare to its rivals?

A: It is statistically tied with its nearest competitors. Against its average benchmark score of 60,008, the Ryzen 9 7945HX sits -0.2 percent away, the Ryzen 7 8745HX -0.2 percent, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D +0.6 percent behind, and the Xeon Gold 6338T -0.9 percent ahead.

Q: Is this a balanced gaming build?

A: No. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile while the GPU ranks in the 50th, giving a combined percentile of 71. Graphics performance is the system's ceiling in games.

Q: Are the FPS figures in this article measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores and percentiles.

Q: Does the Core i9-14900F have integrated graphics?

A: No — integrated graphics are listed as N/A for this "F" variant, so the Arc A380E or another discrete card is required for display output.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: Is the Arc A380E still in production?

A: No. It is marked end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is unlocked: false, so clock tuning through the multiplier is not available.

Gaming Performance

As stated, no measured FPS rows exist for this combination — the gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, principally the Arc A380E's 50th-percentile GPU placement and the CPU's 92nd-percentile ranking.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect frame rates consistent with a mid-field GPU: playable performance in well-optimized titles, but ultra-quality presets in demanding modern games will push the 6 GB framebuffer and 186 GB/s bandwidth to their limits, and ray-traced effects through the 8 RT cores will cost significant performance. Reducing settings will yield meaningful gains precisely because the GPU, not the CPU, is the constraint — the i9-14900F will always have headroom in reserve.

At 1440p the card moves firmly into its comfort zone's outer edge; frame rates will drop further and texture-memory pressure will grow. 4K ultra gaming is not a realistic target for 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and this memory subsystem. High-refresh-rate esports at competitive settings is the most favorable scenario, where lower visual detail shifts load away from fill rate and bandwidth and the CPU's strong single-thread performance can actually be exercised. In all cases these are estimates, not measured results.

Who Should Build It

The right owner for this build is someone whose work is CPU-dominant. Software developers benefit directly: a Geekbench multi-core score of 20,008 and single-core of 2,570 mean fast compiles and responsive IDEs, and the Passmark string-sorting (63,728) and integer-math (177,066) results support data-processing workloads. Content creators doing CPU-side video encoding, audio production, or photo work will get flagship-tier throughput, though GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the A380E. Students and small-business workstations are well served: ECC support and 24 cores make this a credible light workstation, and the four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs on the GPU enable multi-monitor office setups.

Gamers are a narrower fit. Casual and esports gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find the 50th-percentile GPU adequate; enthusiasts chasing high-refresh 1440p or 4K ultra will not — the GPU is the limiting factor and no CPU speed fixes that. 3D artists who render on the CPU will be well served; those who render on the GPU will not.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a flagship Intel Core 14th Gen processor with an entry-level Alchemist discrete GPU. The Core i9-14900F — 24 cores, 32 threads, Raptor Lake-R architecture, 10 nm Intel process — ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The Arc A380E — 1,024 shading units, 6 GB GDDR6, 75 W TDP — ranks in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 71 places the overall system in the upper third of the database, but that aggregate hides the asymmetry: this is a top-tier compute platform with a median graphics card attached. Its tier is best described as a productivity-first desktop with entry-level discrete graphics, not a balanced performance build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not this build's strength. With the GPU at the 50th percentile and no measured FPS data for the pairing, estimated performance supports modest refresh rates at 1080p; the CPU's 92nd-percentile placement is largely wasted in graphics-bound titles.

Streaming: The compute side is excellent — 32 threads and a Passmark multi-thread score of 46,532 absorb encoding and multitasking easily. The limit is game rendering: the GPU must produce the frames first, and at the 50th percentile it will constrain what can be streamed at high quality simultaneously.

Video editing: CPU-side editing benefits from 24 cores and the 39,551-point Cinebench R23 multi-core score; timeline scrubbing and export in CPU encoders will be quick. GPU-accelerated effects and GPU encoding are limited by the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS and 6 GB framebuffer.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is top-decile, directly reflected in the 92nd-percentile CPU ranking. GPU rendering and path tracing fall to the 8 RT cores and mid-field GPU placement, and complex scenes will press against the 6 GB memory limit.

Software development: A strong fit. Geekbench single-core of 2,570 and multi-core of 20,008 mean fast single-file responsiveness and fast full-project builds, and DDR5 support on Socket 1700 provides a modern platform.

Student and office work: Highly capable, with headroom to spare. Multi-monitor support via four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, ECC memory support for data integrity, and single-thread performance near the top of the field make everyday workloads trivial for this hardware.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700 with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus — useful flexibility, since a builder can start with DDR4 and move to DDR5-capable boards and modules within the same socket generation. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, though the Arc A380E itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x8; a future GPU upgrade could exploit the Gen 5 link. ECC support adds a workstation-grade option.

Power is not a constraint on upgrades in this configuration. The CPU's rated TDP is 65 W and the GPU's is 75 W with no auxiliary power connectors, against a suggested PSU of 250 W. Even allowing generous system overhead, a 250 W-class unit as suggested covers this pairing comfortably — though a substantially faster GPU with its own power connectors would justify a higher-capacity PSU.

The sensible next upgrade is clear from the percentiles: the GPU. Moving from a 50th-percentile card to something in the CPU's league would rebalance the system toward its combined-potential ceiling, and the 92nd-percentile processor would remain well matched to a far faster graphics card for years of headroom. Note that the A380E is end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor, reinforcing the GPU as the natural first replacement. The CPU itself, being multiplier-locked, offers no meaningful tuning path — another reason future investment should flow to the graphics card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds