SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a desktop build that leans overwhelmingly on its processor. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all processors benchmarked, while the GPU's sole recorded score places it in the 19th percentile among GPUs — a combined percentile of 56 for the pairing. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured gameplay. The picture that emerges is a heavily CPU-weighted machine: exceptional multi-core throughput for production work, with graphics performance that trails the processor's station considerably.

FAQ

Q: What CPU and GPU are in this build?

A: An Intel Core i9-14900F (Raptor Lake-R, 24 cores and 32 threads) paired with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (GB203, Blackwell 2.0, 24 GB of GDDR7).

Q: How strong is the CPU in benchmarks?

A: It scores 39551 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 20008 in Geekbench multi-core, and 46532 in PassMark multithread, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How strong is the GPU?

A: Its only recorded benchmark is a 3D Mark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, which puts it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs and within a few percent of the Quadro P1000, GeForce 820A, Arc Pro B60, and GTX 860M in the database's average-score rankings.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured frame-rate rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so any FPS numbers discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No — the i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU like the RTX 5080 SUPER is mandatory for display output.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support, on Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What was the launch MSRP of each part?

A: The CPU launched at an MSRP of $524; the GPU launched at an MSRP of 999 USD.

Benchmark Performance

Start with the CPU, because it dominates this build's identity. The i9-14900F posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and a single-core score of 5583 — the latter is a genuinely strong figure that translates into snappy, low-latency behavior in applications that refuse to scale past a few threads. In Cinebench R20 the gap between generations of testing holds: 16611 multi-core against 2344 single-core. Even the older R15 run shows 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. Geekbench tells the same story at 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core, and PassMark rounds it out with 46532 multithread and 4506 single-thread scores.

The percentile context matters here: 92nd percentile against all CPUs means this chip outranks roughly nine in ten processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 60008 lands it effectively dead even with its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX sits at 60099 (a delta of just -0.2%), the Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (-0.2%), and the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 (+0.6%). Only the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T pulls meaningfully ahead at 60572, and even that is a -0.9% delta. In practical terms, the i9-14900F performs within a fraction of a percent of chips that anchor serious workstation and gaming-desktop lineups.

The GPU side is thinner and weaker. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a single benchmark entry — 3075 in 3D Mark Steel Nomad DX12 — and an average score of 3075 accordingly. Its percentile is 19th against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals by average score are an unusual set: the Quadro P1000 at 3163 (-2.8% delta), the GeForce 820A at 2983 (+3.1%), the Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (-3.4%), and the GTX 860M at 2967 (+3.6%). Whether or not those comparisons flatter the card, the database says what it says: on recorded benchmark data, this GPU clusters with entry-level and professional-light cards rather than high-end gaming boards.

The combined percentile of 56 reflects that split almost exactly — a top-tier CPU dragging a lower-tier GPU toward the middle of the pack.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is where the mismatch bites. The CPU's 92nd-percentile standing and 5583 R23 single-core score would happily feed a much faster graphics card, but the GPU's 19th-percentile ranking and 3075 Steel Nomad score cap frame rates well below what the processor could sustain. Expect playable but not elite frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with headroom for high refresh only in lighter titles. All FPS figures here are estimates — no measured data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: Dual-PC workflows are overkill here, because 24 cores and 32 threads can encode a stream and run the game simultaneously without breaking stride — the 39551 R23 multi-core score guarantees encoding threads are available. The limiting factor is again the GPU's rendering capacity, so stream quality will exceed game smoothness.

Video editing: The strongest creative case for this build. Timeline scrubbing responds to the 2570 Geekbench single-core score, exports chew through the 20008 Geekbench multi-core result, and 24 GB of GDDR7 VRAM at 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth holds generous preview caches. Effects that run on the GPU's 336 tensor cores also benefit.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is excellent — 39551 in R23 multi-core is near-workstation territory for a desktop part, and the PassMark floating point score of 119550 backs that up. GPU-path rendering via the 84 RT cores is serviceable for previews, but the 19th-percentile benchmark standing means final-frame GPU rendering will trail what the CPU sockets can do.

Software development: Compilation is a multi-core problem, and 46532 on PassMark multithread plus 24 cores means large codebases build quickly. Containers, VMs, and parallel test suites all fit comfortably. This is arguably the best-matched use case for the hardware balance.

Student and office work: Massive overkill, but pleasant. Documents, browsing, and video calls sit idle on one or two of the 32 threads; the 562 R15 single-core score ensures everything feels instant. The platform's DDR5 and ECC support also adds a layer of stability for coursework that matters.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this build is unambiguous: the graphics card. The CPU operates at the 92nd percentile of all processors; the GPU at the 19th percentile of all GPUs. That is a gap of over seventy percentile points, and the combined percentile of 56 lands almost exactly between them — weighted slightly toward the CPU's strength.

What does that mean in practice? In any GPU-bound workload — gaming at higher resolutions, GPU rendering, ray-traced effects — the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075 Steel Nomad score is the ceiling, and the i9-14900F spends most of its 24 cores waiting. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, encoding, simulation, compression (the PassMark data compression score of 564207 is a standout) — the GPU sits idle and the build performs like a near-top-tier workstation.

There is no realistic scenario in which this CPU limits this GPU. The 5.80 GHz boost clock and 5583 single-core R23 score would keep pace with a far more capable card. Since no measured FPS scaling data exists for this pairing, the estimate is qualitative: frame rates will scale with the GPU's 19th-percentile standing, not the CPU's 92nd, at any resolution where the graphics card is the constraint.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: this database contains no measured frame-rate rows for the i9-14900F plus RTX 5080 SUPER — the measured FPS table is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores, not recorded gameplay.

Working from those scores: the Steel Nomad result of 3075 and the 19th-percentile GPU ranking suggest modest frame rates in modern AAA titles at ultra settings. At 1080p, lighter esports-style titles should run at high refresh thanks to the CPU's elite single-thread performance (4506 PassMark single-thread), but graphically demanding games will be limited by the card. At 1440p the GPU becomes the constraint in nearly everything; at 4K, ultra-settings playability in the latest releases is doubtful based on this benchmark standing.

The GPU's raw specifications complicate the picture in an interesting way. The hardware list — 10752 shading units, 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, 1.02 TB/s of memory bandwidth, PCIe 5.0 x16, 24 GB of GDDR7 — reads like a high-end card, yet the recorded benchmark score places it low in the rankings. The database analysis can only report both facts: strong on-paper specs, weak recorded score. Frame-rate estimates should follow the score, not the spec sheet, until measured data lands in the database.

Who Should Build It

The ideal owner of this build is someone whose workload is CPU-heavy with incidental graphics needs. Software developers top the list: the 24-core, 32-thread configuration with a 20008 Geekbench multi-core score makes this a compilation and containerization monster, and the GPU is more than sufficient for multiple displays via its one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Content creators who edit video but game casually fit next — the CPU muscle handles exports and the 24 GB of VRAM benefits timeline work, while gaming performance is adequate rather than thrilling. Students in technical fields get a machine that will outlast a degree program, with DDR5 support and ECC available on the platform. Small businesses deploying workstations for data processing will appreciate the 564207 PassMark data compression score, the 34644 encryption score, and ECC memory support for integrity-sensitive work.

Who should not build it: competitive high-refresh gamers and 4K ultra-settings players. The GPU's 19th-percentile benchmark standing cannot deliver that experience, regardless of how exceptional the CPU is. A buyer whose priority ranking starts with frame rates should treat this pairing as mismatched.

CPU Analysis

The i9-14900F is a Raptor Lake-R part — Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, fabricated in-house by Intel on a 257 mm² die. Released in early 2024 as part of the 14th generation, it carries 24 cores and 32 threads: a hybrid design where the thread count sits below double the core count, consistent with a mix of core types sharing the 32-thread budget. The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a 6.00 GHz-class jump to a 5.80 GHz boost — that spread is enormous, and it is the boost behavior that defines the chip's feel. Single-core scores of 562 (R15), 2344 (R20), and 5583 (R23) all reflect that high boost clock.

Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 36 MB of shared L3. That L3 pool is what keeps 24 cores fed in throughput workloads, and it shows in the 39551 R23 multi-core result. The 65 W TDP rating is the official figure; the chip's unlocked status is explicitly false in the database — this is not a multiplier-unlocked part, so overclocking is off the table.

The platform details matter for builders: Socket 1700, dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Those Gen 5 lanes match the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface exactly, so there is no interface bottleneck between CPU and card. The lack of integrated graphics (the F suffix) means no fallback output — the discrete GPU is mandatory. Rival context: the chip trades blows within a single percentage point of the Ryzen 9 7945HX, Ryzen 7 8745HX, and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and sits just under the Xeon Gold 6338T — company that confirms its near-flagship standing at the 92nd percentile.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, full stop — an LGA 1700 socket, a dual-slot graphics card over 300 mm long, and a 16-pin power connector are tower components, not laptop hardware. The tier, read strictly from the percentiles, is a split personality: a 92nd-percentile CPU bolted to a 19th-percentile GPU, netting a combined 56th percentile.

Classify it as a mid-tier overall system with a flagship-class processor. The build makes sense as a compute-first machine — development, encoding, data processing, office-grade visualization — where the graphics card exists to drive displays and handle moderate GPU acceleration rather than to anchor gaming performance. The PCIe Gen 5 link between CPU and GPU and the DDR5 memory option both future-proof the platform, and the CPU's active production status and part number SRN3W mean availability is not a concern.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER is a GB203 chip on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The silicon itself is substantial: 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter — figures consistent with a modern high-end design.

The spec sheet reads like one, too. Base clock of 2295 MHz and boost of 2617 MHz; 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs; 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. Raw rates include 293.1 GPixel/s of pixel fill, 879.3 GTexel/s of texture fill, and 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. Memory is the standout: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective) for 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth — a figure that comfortably supports high-resolution texture streaming and large AI models.

Yet the recorded benchmark tells a different story. A Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 and a 19th-percentile ranking place this card alongside the Quadro P1000 (-2.8%), GeForce 820A (+3.1%), Arc Pro B60 (-3.4%), and GTX 860M (+3.6%) in the database's rival clustering. For rendering workloads, the practical read is this: the tensor cores and VRAM capacity make the card genuinely useful for AI inference and content-creation acceleration, while gaming-class throughput per the benchmark data is far below what the transistor count and bandwidth imply. The board's physical requirements — a 415 W TDP, one 16-pin power connector, a dual-slot 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm footprint, and one HDMI 2.1b plus three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs — dictate a spacious case and a suitably rated power supply, both of which are certainties from the spec regardless of benchmark standing.

The bottom line for builders: this is a CPU-first machine with a GPU whose recorded scores and on-paper hardware tell two different stories, and the database's measured data — sparse as it is — should carry the weighting until more results arrive.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds