SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF and Intel Arc A380E form an unusual desktop pairing that pits one of the most powerful consumer CPUs ever made against a modest, entry-level graphics card. The data shows a system with extraordinary computational headroom in the processor, but with graphics capabilities that sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This creates a profound imbalance that defines the entire character of the build, making it a fascinating case study in component pairing priorities.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 5.80 GHz, which explains its exceptional single-thread performance scores. The chip features a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This configuration delivers benchmark results that place it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 48,855 in multi-core and 6,897 in single-core tests. These figures represent a massive multi-threaded capability that is approximately 7 times higher than its single-thread score, highlighting the scaling efficiency of its 24 cores. The Geekbench results show 22,486 multi-core and 2,668 single-core scores, while 3DMark tests demonstrate strong scaling from 1,188 in single-thread to 15,405 in max threads. The Passmark suite further confirms this dominance: 57,729 in multithread, 206,859 in integer math, and 150,869 in floating-point math.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900KF is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, sitting at a 0% delta with an average score of 61,841 versus 61,834. It also matches the Intel Core i9-13900K within 0.1% and the Intel Core i9-13900T within 0.2%. The data indicates that this processor is at the absolute top tier of desktop computing, with its only meaningful competitor being its own direct variants. For real workloads, this translates to exceptional performance in CPU-intensive tasks like software compilation, video encoding, scientific computing, and any application that can leverage 32 threads. The high single-thread score of 4,584 in Passmark also ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 modules or higher-performance DDR5 kits depending on their priorities. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented users who require data integrity in their computing tasks. PCIe connectivity is provided through Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and high-end expansion cards.

The platform's memory support spans two generations, which means the upgrade path from this CPU involves either sticking with the current Socket 1700 motherboards or eventually moving to a newer platform. The 125 W TDP of the i9-13900KF is moderate for a flagship processor, but the CPU's boost behavior and multi-core workloads can push power consumption higher in practice. The GPU, meanwhile, has a 75 W TDP and requires only a 250 W suggested PSU, making the overall power requirements of this system remarkably modest given the CPU's capabilities.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this system. The Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile among GPUs, which is dramatically lower than the CPU's 93rd percentile standing. A builder looking to balance this system would prioritize upgrading the graphics card to something that can match the CPU's computational prowess. Alternatively, users who primarily need CPU horsepower for productivity tasks might find this pairing sufficient and could defer GPU upgrades until they encounter graphics-bound workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is based on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, featuring 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The GPU operates with a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz effective 15.5 Gbps. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus delivers 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards.

The A380E's compute capabilities include 8 ray tracing cores, though the card does not list dedicated tensor cores. Its rendering performance is rated at 64.00 GPixel/s for pixel rate and 128.0 GTexel/s for texture rate. The FP32 compute is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 8.192 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These figures place the card at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating mid-pack performance that is adequate for 1080p gaming but not competitive with higher-tier offerings.

The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully modern in API support. It features four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is generous for multi-monitor setups. The physical design is a single-slot card measuring 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, with no external power connectors required since it draws all power from the PCIe slot. The GPU is marked as end-of-life with its successor being Battlemage, which suggests that software optimization may become a concern as Intel shifts focus to newer architectures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of severe imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a situation where the processor will almost never be the limiting factor in any workload. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this middle-ground performance, but it masks the extreme disparity between the two components.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (scoring 786,218 in Passmark), encryption (46,186), or extended instruction processing (46,084), the i9-13900KF will perform at near-flagship levels. The GPU's role in these tasks is minimal or non-existent. However, in graphics-bound scenarios such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will impose a hard ceiling on frame rates and render times.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that the CPU could support far higher frame rates than the GPU can deliver. The i9-13900KF's single-thread score of 1,188 in 3DMark single-thread indicates strong gaming responsiveness, but the A380E's mid-pack GPU percentile means that actual gaming performance will be limited by the graphics card in almost all scenarios. This is a classic case where the CPU's potential is effectively wasted in graphics-heavy workloads, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck for gaming and rendering.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900KF support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules for their Socket 1700 motherboard.

Q: What is the GPU's power consumption and PSU requirement?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has a 75 W TDP and requires a suggested PSU of 250 W. It draws power entirely from the PCIe slot and has no external power connectors.

Q: How does the i9-13900KF compare to its closest rival?

A: The i9-13900KF has an average benchmark score of 61,841, which is a 0% delta compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61,834, making them effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1937 MHz effective 15.5 Gbps.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A380E is marked as end-of-life with a successor codenamed Battlemage. Its predecessor was Xe Graphics.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The i9-13900KF has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz with a base clock of 3.00 GHz, which contributes to its high single-thread performance scores.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing is 72, reflecting the CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 50th percentile among their respective categories.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data shows that the i9-13900KF has exceptional single-thread performance with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,188 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,584, which suggests it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the Arc A380E's mid-pack GPU percentile and 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 compute indicate that actual gaming performance will be constrained by the graphics card.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the A380E likely delivers playable frame rates in less demanding titles but will struggle with modern AAA games that require higher graphics throughput. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p but may cause texture streaming issues in games with large asset requirements. The GPU's 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and effects.

The CPU's performance headroom means that frame times will be consistently smooth from the processor side, but the GPU will be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Users should expect that lowering graphical settings will yield more noticeable improvements than CPU upgrades. The system is better suited for esports titles and older games at high frame rates rather than advanced 3D titles at maximum settings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance above all else and have minimal graphics requirements. The i9-13900KF's 93rd percentile CPU standing makes it ideal for content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation where the GPU's role is secondary. Data scientists and researchers running simulation workloads will benefit from the 32 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Programmers and software developers will find the CPU's strong multi-core scores valuable for building large codebases, with the Passmark integer math score of 206,859 indicating rapid compilation times. Students in computer science or engineering fields can leverage the CPU's power for academic projects while the modest GPU keeps the system simple and power-efficient. Small business workstations that run database queries, virtual machines, or office productivity suites will see excellent responsiveness from the processor.

However, gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K experiences should avoid this build, as the A380E's 50th percentile GPU standing will not deliver the frame rates that the CPU can support. Similarly, professionals in 3D animation or video editing who rely heavily on GPU acceleration will find the Arc A380E insufficient for their needs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that combines the Intel Core i9-13900KF with the Intel Arc A380E. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor on Socket 1700, representing the top tier of Intel's 13th generation desktop lineup. The GPU is an entry-level Alchemist architecture card based on the DG2-128 chip with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The combined percentile of 72 places this system in the upper-midrange tier overall, but this aggregate figure obscures the extreme disparity between components. The CPU alone ranks at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile. This creates a system that is exceptional for CPU-bound workloads and merely average for graphics tasks.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with a dedicated motherboard and power supply. The GPU's low power requirements and single-slot design make it easy to accommodate in most cases, while the CPU's 125 W TDP allows for a wide range of cooling solutions.

Benchmark Performance

The i9-13900KF achieves an average benchmark score of 61,841, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, scores 61,834 for a 0% delta, making them statistically identical. The Intel Core i9-13900K trails by only 0.1% at 61,766, while the Intel Core i9-13900T is 0.2% behind at 61,723. The Intel Xeon 636 rounds out the comparison at 61,360, 0.8% lower.

The GPU's benchmark section is empty in the data, but its percentile ranking of 50 indicates mid-pack performance among all GPUs. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is performing at near-flagship levels while the GPU is performing at exactly average levels. This results in a combined percentile of 72, reflecting the CPU's dominance in the pairing.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,855 demonstrates the processor's ability to handle heavily threaded workloads, while the single-core score of 6,897 confirms its strength in everyday tasks. The Geekbench scores of 22,486 multi-core and 2,668 single-core reinforce this pattern. The 3DMark results show scaling from 1,188 single-thread to 15,405 max threads, indicating efficient utilization of all 32 threads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient for high frame rates, but the GPU's 50th percentile standing limits actual FPS. Estimated 1080p performance is playable in esports titles, but the A380E will bottleneck the i9-13900KF in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads and strong multi-core scores can handle simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 57,729 indicates ample headroom for software encoding, though the GPU's modest performance may limit game settings during streams.

Video editing: The i9-13900KF's Cinebench R23 score of 48,855 accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. However, the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides limited GPU acceleration for effects and color grading, making CPU-based workflows more practical.

3D rendering: CPU rendering with the i9-13900KF will be exceptionally fast, with the Passmark floating-point math score of 150,869 indicating strong compute throughput. GPU rendering will be constrained by the A380E's mid-pack performance, so users should rely on CPU rendering paths.

Software development: The high integer math score of 206,859 and data compression score of 786,218 make this system excellent for compiling large codebases and managing build pipelines. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in iterative compilation tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's responsiveness in single-threaded tasks, evidenced by the 4,584 Passmark single-thread score, ensures smooth operation across productivity suites. The low-power GPU keeps the system quiet and energy-efficient for classroom or office environments, though 4K display support is limited by the GPU's capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds