SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER form a desktop pairing with a large performance gap. The CPU is rated at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, the GPU at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined build sits at the 56th percentile. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so every gaming estimate below is derived from benchmark scores, not from frame capture.

FAQ

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Core i9-13900KF has 24 cores and 32 threads on Intel Socket 1700 with Raptor Lake-S architecture. Its base clock is 3.00 GHz, boost clock is 5.80 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked.

Q: What memory support does the CPU have?

A: It supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is also listed as supported. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared.

Q: What are the GPU's memory specifications?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock is listed as 2000 MHz / 32 Gbps effective.

Q: What percentile does each component hold?

A: The CPU holds the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, the GPU holds the 19th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined build percentile is 56.

Q: What is the GPU's only benchmark score?

A: The only GPU benchmark in the pack is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 3075. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (-2.8%), Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (-3.4%), NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (+3.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (+3.6%).

Q: What are the closest CPU scores to the 13900KF?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 61841. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (0%), Intel Core i9-13900K at 61766 (+0.1%), Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (+0.2%), and Intel Xeon 636 at 61360 (+0.8%).

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this pairing?

A: No. The dataIsMeasured flag is false and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty, so no exact frame-rate figures exist for the Core i9-13900KF paired with the RTX 5080 SUPER.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Cinebench R23 multi-core returns 48855, while single-core returns 6897. Geekbench multi-core returns 22486 and single-core returns 2668. The 3DMark thread scaling results climb from 2353 with 2 threads to 8510 with 8 threads, then 11177 with 16 threads, and 15405 with max threads; the single-thread score is 1188. PassMark multithread is 57729 and PassMark single-thread is 4584. In the immediate CPU comparison list, the nearest rival scores are 61834, 61766, 61723, and 61360, with deltas of 0%, +0.1%, +0.2%, and +0.8%. This is a high-end desktop CPU that sits only marginally ahead of its closest measurable rivals.

The GPU has one benchmark entry in the pack: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 3075. That places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (-2.8%), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (-3.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (+3.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (+3.6%). Because there is only one GPU test in the data, the average benchmark score for the GPU is also 3075.

The combined percentile of this build is 56. That position is far closer to the GPU’s 19th percentile than to the CPU’s 93rd percentile. The combined picture is direct: the CPU is a top-tier productivity and compute part, while the GPU’s only measured DirectX 12 score places it in a much lower tier in this dataset.

Balance and Bottleneck

The largest imbalance in this build is the gap between the CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 19th percentile. In multi-threaded CPU workloads, the processor has considerable headroom. The 3DMark max-thread score is 15405, Cinebench R23 multi-core is 48855, and PassMark multithread is 57729. PassMark integer math reaches 206859, floating-point math reaches 150869, data compression reaches 786218, data encryption reaches 46186, and extended instructions reach 46084. These results point to a processor that can handle heavy compute work without becoming the limiting factor.

The GPU is the restrictive component in graphics-intensive work. The only GPU benchmark score is 3075, and the GPU percentile sits at 19. For any workload that depends on the GPU’s rendering path, that low measured standing is the constraint. There is no measured FPS scaling data in the pack, so frame-rate scaling across settings cannot be cited directly. Instead, the percentile split itself is the evidence: a 93rd-percentile CPU paired with a 19th-percentile GPU is a CPU-heavy balance. The combined 56th percentile reflects that split, pulled downward by the GPU side of the pairing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Core i9-13900KF plus RTX 5080 SUPER combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming expectations in this section are estimates based on the available benchmark scores, not empirical frame-rate measurements.

Estimated gaming performance is GPU-limited. The GPU’s only benchmark result, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, corresponds to the 19th GPU percentile. High-detail, graphics-heavy titles would be expected to land in a much lower performance band than a system with a high-percentile GPU. The CPU’s single-thread scores, including Cinebench R23 single-core 6897, Geekbench single-core 2668, 3DMark single-thread 1188, and PassMark single-thread 4584, indicate enough processor throughput for CPU-sensitive games when the GPU is not saturated. At lower graphical settings, the CPU can feed the GPU without much difficulty. At higher graphical settings, the GPU’s low percentile becomes the expected ceiling.

Because no measured FPS data is present, no exact frame rate can be assigned to any game, resolution, or quality preset. Any specific FPS figure would be a guess beyond the limits of the FACT PACK.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best for users who will lean on the 24-core CPU. Content creators working with multi-threaded rendering or export workloads have Cinebench R23 multi-core 48855 and 3DMark max-threads 15405 as evidence of heavy throughput. Developers and small business workstations can use the PassMark integer math score of 206859, floating-point math score of 150869, data compression score of 786218, and data encryption score of 46186 as indicators of mixed productivity capability. Students or users running single-threaded applications can rely on Geekbench single-core 2668 and PassMark single-thread 4584. Since this is a desktop-class build, it belongs in a tower workstation rather than a portable system.

For gamers, this is a narrow configuration. The CPU can handle competitive, CPU-bound titles at lower graphics settings, but the GPU’s 19th percentile makes it a weak match for visually demanding gaming. The data points to a GPU-heavy upgrade as the next step if gaming performance is the primary goal.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It is fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The memory subsystem is large: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. Core clocks are 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost, while the memory clock is listed as 2000 MHz / 32 Gbps effective.

The compute configuration includes 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 56.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1). These are sizeable hardware resources. Yet the only benchmark result in the FACT PACK is 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places the GPU at the 19th percentile. The nearest rival scores are 3163, 3182, 2983, and 2967, so the measured gap to the closest higher-scoring rivals is about -2.8% to -3.4%, and the lead over the closest lower-scoring rivals is about +3.1% to +3.6%.

For rendering, the data is mixed. The memory capacity and compute figures suggest the GPU can handle large textures and heavy compute work, but the single DirectX 12 benchmark score does not confirm strong measured rendering performance. RT cores and tensor cores are present, but no ray tracing or tensor workload benchmark is included, so their practical impact cannot be quantified from this pack.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900KF is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. It uses Intel’s 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz. Cache is configured as 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB L3 shared. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and ECC is supported. The CPU provides Gen5 PCIe with 20 CPU lanes. TDP is 125 W, and the part has been available since 2022-09-26.

The benchmark results for the CPU are the strongest part of this build. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 48855 and single-core scores 6897. Geekbench multi-core scores 22486 and single-core scores 2668. 3DMark max-threads scores 15405, while the 2-thread score is 2353. PassMark multithread scores 57729 and PassMark single-thread scores 4584. Specialized PassMark tests include integer math 206859, floating-point math 150869, data compression 786218, data encryption 46186, extended instructions 46084, random string sorting 86510, find prime numbers 225, and physics 2956.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 61841, with a 93rd CPU percentile. Its nearest CPU rivals are almost identical in average score, with deltas from 0% to +0.8%. This is a high-performance desktop processor in the dataset, with very little separation between it and the i9-13900K, i9-13900T, or Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel memory bus, so the memory upgrade path depends on which memory type the selected motherboard supports. ECC compatibility is present, which is relevant for workstation-oriented builds. The CPU provides Gen5 PCIe with 20 CPU lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Power information is limited to the listed CPU TDP of 125 W and GPU TDP of 415 W. The FACT PACK does not provide a suggested PSU figure. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector. The physical GPU is dual-slot, 304 mm long / 12 inches, 137 mm / 5.4 inches high, and 40 mm / 1.6 inches wide. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors.

The most sensible next upgrade, based on the data, is the GPU. The CPU is already at the 93rd percentile, and its closest measured rival, the Core i9-13900K, is only 0.1% higher in average score. A CPU swap to that part would produce almost no measured gain. The GPU sits at the 19th percentile and is the component lowering the combined build to the 56th percentile. Replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile card is the higher-impact upgrade path.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build with a combined percentile of 56, made up of a 93rd-percentile CPU and a 19th-percentile GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61841, while the GPU’s single Steel Nomad score is 3075. The 24-core Raptor Lake processor gives the system a workstation-class compute core, while the Blackwell 2.0 GPU with 24 GB of GDDR7 provides a large memory buffer but a low measured benchmark position. Overall, this is a CPU-first system. It is strong for multi-threaded productivity and compute-bound work, but in GPU-driven tasks it sits in a much lower tier according to the benchmark data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds