SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A380E: A Desktop Benchmark Analysis

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-13900K with the Intel Arc A380E represents a desktop build where CPU performance dramatically outpaces GPU capability. The i9-13900K sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A380E lands at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, creating a combined system percentile of 71. This disparity is central to understanding the system's behavior across workloads: the processor delivers enthusiast-tier compute performance, while the graphics card provides entry-level rendering capability. The data in this analysis is drawn entirely from the provided benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. This is a compact GPU designed for efficiency rather than raw throughput. The card operates at a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory configuration consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. This is a modest memory subsystem by contemporary standards, and the 96-bit interface inherently limits the amount of data the GPU can move per cycle. For rendering tasks, this bandwidth constrains texture streaming and framebuffer operations, particularly at higher resolutions where memory pressure increases. The 6 GB capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming and lighter creative workloads, but it will become a limiting factor in scenarios requiring large texture sets or high-resolution rendering buffers.

The GPU's compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. Intel specifies pixel rate at 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate at 128.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 4.096 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. These figures place the A380E in the entry-level segment, roughly matching the throughput expected from a low-profile discrete GPU. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, though the overall RT throughput will be constrained by the limited shading and texture resources.

The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern graphics APIs. Display output is handled through 4x DisplayPort 2.0 connections, which is notably forward-looking for a card in this performance class. The GPU has no benchmarks listed in the data, meaning its average benchmark score is 0 and it has no nearest rivals for comparison. Its percentile position at 50 indicates it sits exactly at the median of all GPUs, but without measured scores, the percentile is derived from specifications rather than empirical testing.

For rendering workloads, the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate it can handle basic 3D rendering and video encoding tasks, but it will struggle with complex scenes or high-resolution outputs. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM are sufficient for 1080p content creation but will throttle performance in 1440p or 4K rendering scenarios.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-13900K achieves an average benchmark score of 61,766, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61,723 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841 (0.1% lower), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61,360 (0.7% lower). The i9-13900K is effectively tied with its direct competition, with deltas under 1% across all four rivals.

In 3DMark tests, the CPU scales predictably with thread count. The single-thread score is 1,187, which jumps to 2,355 for 2 threads, 4,648 for 4 threads, 8,520 for 8 threads, 11,201 for 16 threads, and peaks at 15,509 for max threads. This scaling pattern shows strong multi-threading efficiency, with the max-thread score being 13.07 times the single-thread score. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 5,805.5 with a single-core score of 318; R20 multicore reaches 20,740 with a single-core score of 2,927; R23 multicore hits 38,271.5 with a single-core score of 2,238.5. Geekbench reports 22,820 for multicore and 2,628 for single-core.

PassMark tests show specialized workload strengths. Integer math scores 207,792, floating-point math scores 151,562, and extended instructions score 46,477. Data compression scores 793,645, while data encryption scores 46,609. Random string sorting achieves 87,705, and finding prime numbers scores 236. The multithread score is 58,589, physics scores 3,140, and single-thread scores 4,608.

The GPU side has no benchmark scores to report. The Arc A380E has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0, with no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile position is derived from specification-based comparisons rather than empirical testing. This means the combined picture relies entirely on CPU benchmarks, with GPU performance inferred from its hardware specifications.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects the system's overall tier, but this figure is heavily weighted by the CPU's strong showing. The GPU's median position pulls the combined score down from the CPU's 92nd percentile, indicating that the system's overall performance is bottlenecked by graphics capability.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. It uses Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock runs at 3.00 GHz, boosting up to 5.80 GHz, with a thermal design power of 125 W. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 allocation benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, such as database operations or scientific computing. The 24-core configuration with 32 threads indicates a hybrid layout, though the data does not specify the performance-core and efficiency-core split. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, and carries the part number SRMBH.

Benchmark scores reveal the CPU's character. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 is exceptionally high, indicating strong sustained multi-threaded performance for rendering and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 2,238.5 is also competitive, showing excellent per-thread performance for applications that rely on single-threaded execution, such as older games or certain productivity tools. The Geekbench multicore score of 22,820 and single-core score of 2,628 follow a similar pattern.

PassMark data provides insight into specific workload types. The integer math score of 207,792 suggests strong performance in general-purpose computing, while the floating-point score of 151,562 indicates good scientific and engineering calculation capability. Data compression at 793,645 points to efficient file archiving and data transfer operations. The encryption score of 46,609 shows competent cryptographic performance, useful for secure communications and VPN workloads.

The 3DMark thread scaling from 1,187 single-thread to 15,509 max-thread demonstrates near-linear scaling, implying effective utilization of all available cores. This makes the i9-13900K suitable for heavily parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and software compilation. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position as a high-end desktop processor, with rivals within 0.7% confirming its competitive stance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,766.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900K is within 0.7% of all four listed rivals. The Intel Core i9-13900T is 0.1% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is 0.1% lower, the Intel Core i9-13900KF is 0.1% lower, and the Intel Xeon 636 is 0.7% lower.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A380E features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the Arc A380E has an empty benchmarks array with an average score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile position is specification-based.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, reflecting the CPU's dominant performance contribution.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The i9-13900K has a TDP of 125 W and uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which accommodates the i9-13900K. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on availability and platform cost. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage devices. ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation use.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is the bus interface for the Arc A380E. This is a half-width connection compared to the typical x16 slot, but the card's bandwidth requirements are modest given its 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The system's PSU headroom is substantial: the CPU's TDP of 125 W combined with the GPU's TDP of 75 W and suggested PSU of 250 W indicates a low overall power draw, leaving significant room for upgrades.

The most sensible upgrade path is the GPU, given the massive performance disparity between the CPU and GPU. The i9-13900K's 92nd percentile CPU performance can drive far more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking. A GPU with higher compute throughput and more VRAM would better utilize the CPU's capabilities in gaming and rendering workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are forward-compatible, though current GPUs typically use PCIe 4.0, so no platform change is needed for a GPU upgrade.

The CPU itself is near the top of its platform generation, with rivals within 0.7% including the i9-13900KF. Upgrading the CPU would require moving to a different socket or platform, which is a larger investment. The 125 W TDP leaves thermal headroom, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for additional performance. The 36 MB L3 cache and 24-core configuration are already sufficient for most workloads, making the GPU the clear upgrade priority.

For storage and connectivity, the 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support high-speed NVMe drives, though the data does not specify M.2 slot counts or additional chipset lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed, and ECC memory support suits reliability-focused builds.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over graphics performance. The i9-13900K's 92nd percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 make it suitable for content creators who render 3D scenes, edit high-resolution video, or compile large software projects. The PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and floating-point score of 151,562 indicate strong general-purpose and scientific computing capability, appealing to researchers and engineers running simulations or data analysis.

Software developers benefit from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration, which accelerates code compilation and parallel build tasks. The 3DMark max-thread score of 15,509 shows effective multi-core utilization, directly translating to faster build times. Students in computer science or engineering fields would find the CPU responsive for coursework involving compilation, data processing, and algorithm development.

Small business workstations handling databases, virtualization, or financial modeling would leverage the CPU's data compression score of 793,645 and encryption score of 46,609 for efficient data management and secure transactions. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running server-like workloads.

Gamers at 1080p resolution are the primary gaming audience, as the Arc A380E's specifications — 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, 6 GB VRAM, and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth — are entry-level. The GPU's 50th percentile position means it can handle lighter titles at 1080p, but the CPU's performance is wasted in most gaming scenarios. Content creators working primarily with CPU-bound tasks like video encoding would see strong performance, while GPU-accelerated rendering would be limited by the A380E.

The build is less suitable for GPU-intensive industries like 3D animation, machine learning training, or high-end gaming, where the GPU's modest compute resources would bottleneck. However, for CPU-bound workloads with occasional graphics needs, this pairing is functional.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a pronounced imbalance, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and GPU at the 50th percentile. This 42-percentile gap means the GPU is the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload. The combined percentile of 71 sits between the two, reflecting the CPU's dominance in the overall score.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is the bottleneck. The Arc A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level figures, while the i9-13900K's single-thread score of 1,187 in 3DMark and 4,608 in PassMark indicate it can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. The CPU's 24 cores and 5.80 GHz boost clock are more than sufficient for game logic, physics, and draw call processing, but the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth will cap frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D scene rendering, the CPU is the performance driver. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 22,820 demonstrate that the CPU can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU sits idle or lightly loaded. The GPU's 50th percentile position does not hinder these workloads, as they rely primarily on CPU compute.

For mixed workloads like streaming or real-time 3D rendering, the bottleneck shifts depending on the specific task. Streaming uses CPU for encoding and GPU for rendering; the CPU's high thread count supports simultaneous encoding and gameplay, but the GPU's limited performance will reduce visual quality or frame rates. The 8 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the overall GPU throughput will constrain ray-traced scenes.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. The balanced picture is therefore inferred from the percentile gap and the GPU's specification-level compute limits. The GPU's 64 GTexel/s texture rate and 32 ROPs indicate it can handle 1080p rendering at moderate settings, but the CPU could support much higher performance in a balanced system.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i9-13900K with the Intel Arc A380E. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.80 GHz boost clock and a 92nd percentile ranking, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) card with a 50th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 71, placing the system in the upper-mid tier of overall performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61,766 is within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, confirming its position as a top-tier desktop processor. The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its 50th percentile is specification-based. The system's overall tier is defined by the CPU's strength, making it a CPU-centric build where graphics performance is secondary.

The i9-13900K's launch MSRP is $589, stated once here for reference. The GPU has no launch MSRP in the data. The CPU is actively in production, while the GPU is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage. The CPU was released on 2022-09-26, and the GPU on 2024-03-31, indicating a generational mismatch where the CPU is two years older but significantly more powerful.

This pairing is unusual: a high-end CPU from 2022 with an entry-level GPU from 2024. The system's tier is therefore defined by its processing power rather than its graphics capability. The combined percentile of 71 suggests a system that handles CPU-intensive tasks well but is limited in graphics performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and GPU specifications.

Based on the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 64.00 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate, the Arc A380E is positioned for 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in modern titles. The 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering or reduced quality in games with large texture caches. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests it performs at the median of all GPUs, meaning it can handle esports titles and older games comfortably at 1080p.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,187, PassMark single-thread score of 4,608) ensures that game logic and physics processing will not bottleneck at 1080p. However, the GPU will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the CPU could support. For 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading resources would severely constrain performance, likely resulting in low frame rates even at reduced settings.

Ray tracing performance will be minimal given the 8 RT cores, and the GPU's overall throughput limits RT effects to light implementation. DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures API compatibility, but the hardware cannot deliver high-fidelity ray-traced scenes. For competitive or casual gaming at 1080p, the system is functional, but high-refresh-rate monitors would only be partially utilized due to the GPU's limitations.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,187 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,608 are more than adequate for high-refresh gaming logic, but the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps frame rates. At 1080p, lighter titles may reach 60+ FPS, but the GPU's 50th percentile position means it cannot consistently drive high-refresh displays in demanding games.

Streaming: The i9-13900K's 32 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CPU handles encoding efficiently, but the GPU's limited rendering performance will reduce game quality or resolution during streams.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and data compression score of 793,645 accelerate video processing and codec operations. The GPU provides hardware acceleration for effects and transitions, but 6 GB VRAM limits complex timelines or 4K editing sessions.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 excels at CPU-based rendering, making this build strong for offline rendering tasks. GPU-accelerated rendering via the A380E is limited by its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, suitable for previews but not final frames.

Software development: The 24-core, 32-thread CPU with a 3DMark max-thread score of 15,509 accelerates compilation and testing. The PassMark extended instructions score of 46,477 indicates strong SIMD performance for optimized code paths.

Student and office work: The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking provides responsive performance for everyday tasks, while the GPU's 50th percentile is sufficient for basic graphics. The ECC memory support and 125 W TDP make it a stable, efficient choice for academic or office environments.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds