SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER — Performance Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation flagship desktop processor with NVIDIA's latest Blackwell-architecture GPU. The combination targets a desktop build class with a combined performance percentile of 56, placing it above the median of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. Critically, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate discussion that follows is estimated from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured frame rates are available for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 19th percentile ranking among all graphics cards establish a baseline, but the GPU's percentile is based on a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run of 3075 points — a score that sits 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and 3.4% below the Intel Arc Pro B60, while running 3.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A and 3.6% ahead of the GTX 860M.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated gaming performance leans heavily on the CPU's single-thread strength. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and the 2-thread score of 2355 indicate strong per-core throughput, which typically translates to high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The i9-13900K's 24 cores and 32 threads ensure that even the most demanding game logic threads have dedicated resources, reducing the likelihood of frame-time spikes in simulation-heavy games.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 10752 shading units and 336 texture mapping units provide the raw fill rate needed for mainstream high-refresh gaming, but the 19th overall GPU percentile suggests this card is positioned below the top tier of available graphics solutions. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075, when compared to the nearest rivals, places this GPU in a performance band occupied by workstation and entry-level gaming cards rather than flagship 4K performers.

At 4K resolution, the estimated frame rates would be constrained by the GPU's memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s across a 256-bit bus. The 24 GB GDDR7 memory capacity is generous for texture-heavy titles, but the bandwidth figure, while substantial, is paired with a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s that suggest moderate 4K capability. Expect playable but not exceptional 4K frame rates in demanding titles, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor at this resolution.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4608 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5 indicate that even at lower resolutions where frame rates are highest, the processor has ample headroom. The estimated 1080p experience would be smooth in esports and competitive titles, while 1440p represents the practical sweet spot for this pairing, balancing the CPU's strength with the GPU's mid-tier positioning.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900K posts an average benchmark score of 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (0.1% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (0.1% ahead). The delta between the 13900K and its closest competitors is negligible — within a fraction of a percent — meaning the 13900K is effectively tied with these parts in aggregate performance.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 15509 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 demonstrate substantial parallel capability. The Geekbench multicore score of 22820 reinforces this picture. The PassMark multithread score of 58589 is particularly strong, though the data compression score of 793645 and integer math score of 207792 show where the architecture excels — heavily parallel integer workloads.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5, Geekbench single-core score of 2628, and PassMark singlethread score of 4608 all point to a processor that handles lightly-threaded tasks with ease. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and 2-thread score of 2355 confirm that the boost clock of 5.80 GHz delivers real-world single-core responsiveness.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER presents a more modest picture. Its average benchmark score of 3075 comes from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and the 19th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it below the majority of graphics cards in the database. The nearest rivals — NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (2.8% ahead), Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (3.4% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (3.1% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (3.6% behind) — suggest this GPU sits in a performance tier populated by older workstation cards and low-end mobile parts, despite its modern Blackwell 2.0 architecture and 24 GB GDDR7 memory.

The combined picture is one of a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-to-low-tier GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile stands in stark contrast to the GPU's 19th percentile, and the combined percentile of 56 reflects this imbalance. The CPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing, while the GPU's benchmark results do not indicate flagship-level gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between these two components is substantial. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 19th percentile — a gap of 73 percentile points. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become critical.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 8520 and 16-thread score of 11201 indicate that the processor can feed even demanding game engines with data faster than the GPU can render frames. The GPU's texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, while not trivial, are the constraining factors when resolution increases.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, data compression, and software compilation, the CPU's strength becomes the bottleneck — in a positive sense. The PassMark physics score of 3140 and data encryption score of 46609 show that the CPU handles these tasks quickly, potentially outpacing what the GPU can display in frame-rate-limited scenarios.

The FPS scaling picture — though estimated — follows a predictable pattern. At 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance would allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame output. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's lower percentile ranking would cause frame rates to drop more steeply than they would with a higher-ranked GPU. The CPU would rarely, if ever, be the limiting factor in gaming, even at low resolutions with high refresh rates.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20740 and R15 multicore score of 5805.5 demonstrate that the 24-core, 32-thread configuration excels at parallel tasks. The GPU's role in such workloads — beyond any compute acceleration — is secondary, and its modest benchmark standing suggests it would not be the primary driver of performance in GPU-accelerated tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with a high-refresh monitor, the CPU's single-thread scores — Geekbench single-core of 2628 and PassMark singlethread of 4608 — would support frame rates well above 144 FPS in esports titles. However, the GPU's 19th percentile ranking means that in graphically demanding titles, frame rates would be limited by the graphics card, not the processor. The estimated experience is smooth but not top-tier for competitive play at maximum settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 58589 and data compression score of 793645 indicate that x264 encoding at moderate presets would have minimal impact on gaming frame rates. The GPU's lack of a strong benchmark showing does not preclude NVENC usage, but the CPU is the more reliable encoding resource here.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering benefit from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 would handle multi-track timelines efficiently, while GPU acceleration for effects and color grading would be limited by the GPU's modest 19th percentile standing. Export times would be CPU-bound, and the 24 GB VRAM could help with large projects, but the GPU's raw compute — FP32 of 56.28 TFLOPS — is modest relative to top-tier cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would be strong, with the 13900K's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5805.5 and R20 score of 20740 placing it near the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy. GPU rendering would be limited by the RTX 5080 SUPER's 19th percentile ranking; the 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores are present, but the overall GPU compute throughput is not flagship-class.

Software development: Compilation and test execution benefit from the CPU's high multicore scores. The PassMark integer math score of 207792 and extended instructions score of 46477 indicate strong performance for code compilation, while the 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development workflows, making this pairing acceptable for programmers.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking, but the GPU's 19th percentile standing does not matter for office workloads. The 125 W TDP and 415 W GPU TDP make this a power-hungry setup for basic tasks, though it would handle any student workload without breaking a sweat.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor uses a hybrid core layout typical of 13th-generation Core parts — though the exact P-core/E-core split is not specified in the data, the thread count of 32 from 24 cores implies 8 performance cores with hyperthreading and 16 efficiency cores without.

The base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz represent a wide frequency envelope. The boost clock is among the highest available in desktop processors, and the 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and 2-thread score of 2355 confirm that this frequency translates to real performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5 is particularly telling — it shows that the 13900K holds its own against newer competitors, with the nearest rival (Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus) being only 0.1% ahead in aggregate score.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This helps with the PassMark random string sorting score of 87705 and floating point math score of 151562, both of which benefit from large, fast caches.

The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory supported. This flexibility is valuable for workstation builds where ECC is required. The processor includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which provides display output and basic acceleration if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

The 125 W TDP is modest for a 24-core flagship, though actual power draw under full load may exceed this figure. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The launch MSRP is $589, and the processor was released on 2022-09-26, with production status listed as active.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This means builders can choose between cheaper DDR4 modules or faster DDR5 kits, though the memory bandwidth figure is not specified in the data. ECC memory support adds workstation appeal, and the 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage.

The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the 13900K's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU's dual-slot design and 304 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance, and the 1x 16-pin power connector necessitates a compatible power supply. The GPU TDP is 415 W, and while no suggested PSU figure is provided in the data, the combined TDP of 125 W (CPU) plus 415 W (GPU) totals 540 W before accounting for other components — a capable power supply is essential.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-ranked GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it has substantial headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards, and the 19th percentile GPU is clearly the limiting factor in this build. Swapping the RTX 5080 SUPER for a GPU in the 90th percentile or above would better utilize the 13900K's capabilities, particularly at 1440p and 4K resolutions.

The motherboard socket limits CPU upgrades to 12th and 13th generation Intel Core processors, meaning the 13900K is near the top of what this platform supports. A future platform upgrade would require a new motherboard and potentially new memory, but the current setup remains viable for several years given the CPU's strong benchmark standing.

The GPU's 24 GB GDDR7 memory is a forward-looking feature, but the 256-bit bus width and 19th percentile performance suggest that future driver optimizations might improve standing. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future games.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays would find this pairing adequate, though the CPU is significantly overqualified for this task. The 13900K's single-thread performance ensures high minimum frame rates, but the GPU's 19th percentile ranking means that maxing out settings in demanding titles would cap frame rates below what the CPU could otherwise support.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering would benefit from the CPU's multicore strength — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 22820 are strong. However, GPU-accelerated workflows would be held back by the RTX 5080 SUPER's modest benchmark standing. This build suits creators who prioritize CPU rendering over GPU compute.

Software developers would appreciate the CPU's compilation speed, with PassMark integer math of 207792 and data compression of 793645 indicating fast builds and test runs. The 24 GB VRAM could be useful for local machine learning inference, though the GPU's 19th percentile ranking limits this use case.

Students and small business users would find this build unnecessarily powerful for word processing and spreadsheets, but the 125 W CPU TDP and 415 W GPU TDP make it an expensive-to-run option for basic tasks. The ECC memory support and 24 GB VRAM could justify the cost for specialized workstation use, but most office workloads would be better served by a less powerful, more efficient configuration.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900K — a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs — with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU with a 19th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 56 places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU is the standout component, with an average benchmark score of 61766 that ties it with the Core i9-13900T, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, and Core i9-13900KF within a 0.1% margin. The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 3075 from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run, sits in a performance band near the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and Intel Arc Pro B60.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the CPU's strength and the GPU's relative weakness. It is a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks — compilation, rendering, compression — while delivering moderate gaming performance. The 56th combined percentile reflects this split: above average overall, but with a clear imbalance that favors the processor.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 5080 SUPER a good match for the i9-13900K?

A: The data suggests a significant imbalance. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 19th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU would limit gaming performance in most scenarios, while the CPU would be underutilized in GPU-bound workloads.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: Based on the CPU's strong single-thread scores (Geekbench single-core of 2628, PassMark singlethread of 4608) and the GPU's 19th percentile ranking, 1080p gaming would be the most comfortable fit. 1440p is feasible but would show the GPU's limitations, and 4K would be constrained by the GPU's 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate.

Q: How does the i9-13900K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 13900K's average benchmark score of 61766 is within 0.1% of the Core i9-13900T (61723), Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834), and Core i9-13900KF (61841). These parts are effectively performance equivalents in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Does the RTX 5080 SUPER support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It also includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads, though its overall GPU benchmark percentile is 19th.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this build?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with ECC support. The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the i9-13900K has an unlocked multiplier, and its boost clock is 5.80 GHz. The base clock is 3.00 GHz, and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU has a TDP of 415 W, for a combined 540 W. No suggested PSU figure is provided in the data, but the 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU requires a compatible power supply.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds