SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A380E: Benchmark Database Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T pairs a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh CPU with the Intel Arc A380E, a 6 GB GDDR6 graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture. This is a desktop-class combination that sits at the 69th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU is a 35 W part with a 1.30 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 75 W single-slot card with a 2000 MHz core clock. The pairing targets productivity-first workloads where the CPU's multi-threaded throughput and the GPU's fixed-function media and display capabilities matter more than raw gaming frame rates. Benchmark data shows the CPU at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards — a clear imbalance that shapes every workload analysis below.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T is a Raptor Lake Refresh part manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The chip combines 20 physical cores and 28 threads, a configuration that translates to strong parallel throughput in heavily threaded applications. The base clock of 1.30 GHz is notably low, reflecting the 35 W TDP, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz provides substantial single-thread headroom when thermal and power limits allow. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the processor's ability to handle large working sets without constant memory traffic.

Benchmark results show the CPU's multi-core strength clearly. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 25980 points in multi-core and 3667 points in single-core. The R20 multi-core score of 10911 and R15 multi-core score of 2618 follow the same pattern of strong scaling across cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30571 and integer math score of 113854 further confirm this — the i7-14700T is a workhorse for tasks that can use all 28 threads. The single-thread PassMark score of 3905 indicates that lightly threaded workloads still perform competently, though the processor's design clearly favors parallel execution.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 41914 places it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Comparing to nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41650 (0.6% lower). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the i7-14700T sits in a tightly contested performance band. For real workloads, this means the CPU trades blows with mobile and desktop parts from both AMD and Intel, with no clear winner in aggregate performance. The data shows the processor can handle data compression at 354216 PassMark points, floating-point math at 79042 points, and extended instruction workloads at 20052 points — all suggesting strong capability in scientific computing and content creation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation users who need data integrity. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is not needed or during troubleshooting.

The CPU's TDP is 35 W, which is extremely low for a 20-core part. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds with modest cooling requirements — a capable air cooler is sufficient given the power envelope. The GPU's TDP is 75 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 250 W. Combined, the system's total power draw remains modest, allowing for a wide range of power supply choices. The GPU draws power through the PCIe slot with no additional power connectors, simplifying cable management in smaller cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform supports newer 14th Gen Core processors on the same socket, though the specific model availability is not detailed in the data. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU mean that storage and GPU upgrades that use the latest interface standard will not be bottlenecked by the motherboard or CPU. Memory upgrades to DDR5 would improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel configuration already provides balanced performance. The GPU, being end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, presents the most straightforward upgrade path — replacing the Arc A380E with a higher-tier graphics card would address the GPU bottleneck identified in benchmark analysis.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a CPU at the 88th percentile and a GPU at the 50th percentile. The overall pairing sits at the 69th combined percentile. This gap between CPU and GPU performance is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's average benchmark score of 41914 positions it within 0.6% of its nearest rivals, all of which cluster between 41650 and 42055 points. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and no nearest rivals in the data, meaning its 50th percentile ranking is based on its specifications and relative position in the database rather than direct measured comparisons.

The CPU's Cinebench scores demonstrate consistent scaling: R15 multi-core at 2618, R20 at 10911, and R23 at 25980. The single-core scores of 369 (R15), 1540 (R20), and 3667 (R23) show that the boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivers competitive single-thread performance despite the low base clock. PassMark results reinforce this with a single-thread score of 3905 and a multithread score of 30571. The data compression score of 354216 and encryption score of 21277 indicate strong performance in storage and security workloads. Extended instructions score 20052, which matters for AVX-512-like workloads, though the architecture is Raptor Lake and does not include AVX-512 as a headline feature.

The combined picture is one of a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, this build performs near the top of the database. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A380E will limit overall throughput. The data suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor in any scenario where the GPU is active.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A380E with 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is positioned at the 50th GPU percentile, which suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in many titles, but high-refresh 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors will likely exceed its capabilities in demanding games. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3667 in Cinebench R23) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions.

Streaming: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, with 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units. The Xe-HPG architecture includes hardware-accelerated encoding, though specific encoder details are not in the data. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads, and the PassMark multithread score of 30571 indicates strong parallel processing for streaming software.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core scores (25980 in Cinebench R23, 113854 in integer math) make it well-suited for video encoding and rendering pipelines. The GPU's 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate support effects processing and timeline scrubbing. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and moderate 4K editing timelines, though complex projects with heavy effects layers may exceed its capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads excel in CPU-based rendering engines, with R23 multi-core at 25980 and floating-point math at 79042. The GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 performance support GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 50th percentile ranking means it will be outpaced by higher-tier cards. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but at a lower throughput than competing architectures.

Software development: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and PassMark data compression score of 354216 make it excellent for compilation, code analysis, and test automation. The 28 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 33 MB L3 cache reduces recompilation stalls. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, meaning the CPU's performance dominates this scenario.

Student and office work: The 35 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide an efficient baseline for productivity applications. The CPU's single-thread score of 3905 in PassMark handles spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads with ease. The discrete GPU adds display outputs (4x DisplayPort 2.0) for multi-monitor setups, and the low power draw keeps electricity costs modest. The 6 GB VRAM is excessive for office tasks but provides headroom for occasional creative projects.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 41914.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The data shows the i7-14700T scores 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i7-12850HX, 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 251TE.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement and physical size?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has a TDP of 75 W, requires no power connectors, and is a single-slot card measuring 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The suggested PSU is 250 W.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A380E includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features. The GPU's FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how does it affect single-thread performance?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 reflects this capability. The base clock is 1.30 GHz, which contributes to the low 35 W TDP.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame rate discussion must be treated as estimates based on benchmark scores and component specifications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, most modern games would run at playable frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range, depending on the title's optimization. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but may struggle with 1440p or 4K high-texture packs.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3667 in Cinebench R23 single-core) means that at lower resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck, the processor will not limit frame rates. However, the GPU's 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs indicate a mid-range rasterization capability. Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, which are typically CPU-bound, would benefit from the i7-14700T's high boost clock and likely achieve frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p. AAA titles with heavy GPU demands would see frame rates drop as the Arc A380E reaches its compute and memory bandwidth limits.

The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but with only 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16, ray-traced scenes would likely see significant performance degradation compared to rasterized rendering. Users targeting high-refresh gaming should plan for 1080p with medium-to-high settings in less demanding titles, and accept lower settings or reduced resolutions in graphically intensive games. The GPU's 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multiple monitors, but driving high refresh rates at high resolutions across multiple displays would exceed the GPU's bandwidth and compute capabilities.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this CPU+GPU pairing are those whose workloads are primarily CPU-bound and who need a modest but capable GPU for display output and acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's 28 threads and 88th percentile ranking, with PassMark data compression at 354216 and integer math at 113854 indicating fast build and test cycles. Students and office workers running productivity suites, web browsers, and communication tools will find the 35 W TDP and integrated graphics adequate for daily use, with the discrete GPU providing multi-monitor support via 4x DisplayPort 2.0.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering at 1080p will appreciate the CPU's multi-core throughput (25980 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's hardware acceleration for effects and encoding. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for moderate projects. Small business workstations that run database queries, data analysis, and virtualization will benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support and strong multi-threaded performance. Gamers targeting 1080p with medium settings in less demanding titles will find this build adequate, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is not optimized for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. The build is also suitable for home lab environments where low power consumption (35 W CPU, 75 W GPU) and quiet operation are priorities.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700T and Intel Arc A380E. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency without sacrificing multi-threaded performance. The GPU is an Intel Arc A380E from the Alchemist generation, a 75 W single-slot card with 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 1024 shading units. The combined percentile ranking is 69th among all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

The build's overall tier is defined by the CPU's high-end multi-threaded capability and the GPU's mid-range graphics performance. This is not a balanced gaming rig — it is a productivity-first system that can handle light-to-moderate gaming as a secondary function. The CPU's average benchmark score of 41914 and the GPU's lack of standalone benchmark scores reinforce this assessment. The build excels in CPU-intensive tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, while GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming will be limited by the Arc A380E's mid-range specifications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance analysis is straightforward: the CPU outperforms the GPU by a significant margin. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking against all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs. This means that in any workload that engages both components, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.6% of its average benchmark score, indicating the processor is competitive at its performance tier, while the GPU has no comparable benchmark data but its specifications place it firmly in the mid-range.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and settings. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3667 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it can feed the GPU efficiently, but the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates. At higher resolutions or with ultra settings, the GPU becomes the absolute bottleneck, and the CPU will spend most of its time idle. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, rendering, and data processing, the CPU is the primary engine and the GPU contributes little — here, the CPU's 28 threads and 25980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score define performance.

The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance: the system performs well above average overall because the CPU carries significant weight in the aggregate, but users who prioritize GPU-heavy tasks will see the Arc A380E hold the system back. The suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU and the CPU's 35 W TDP mean power delivery is not a limiting factor, but performance headroom for GPU upgrades exists — replacing the Arc A380E with a higher-tier card would address the primary bottleneck without requiring a new power supply.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process node, with a die size of 157 mm² and 7200 million transistors. The chip, designated DG2-128, has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) across a 96-bit bus, yielding 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate creative workloads, though the narrow 96-bit bus limits memory throughput compared to wider-memory cards.

The GPU's compute capability is rated at 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU has 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, supporting modern high-resolution monitors. The card is single-slot, 254 mm long, requires no power connectors, and has a 75 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the database's graphics card performance distribution. The lack of benchmark scores and nearest rivals means the ranking is derived from specifications rather than measured performance. The 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate a card suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light rendering tasks. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for current 1080p titles but may become limiting as games increase texture sizes. The Xe-HPG architecture supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 8 RT cores are a modest count, so ray-traced performance will be lower than rasterized performance by a significant margin. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage named as its successor, meaning software optimization and driver support may plateau over time.