SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700F paired with the Intel Arc A380E is an unusual desktop combination: a 16-core Raptor Lake CPU sitting at the 86th percentile of all processors, joined to a single-slot entry-level GPU at the 50th percentile. The result is a build where the processor massively outruns the graphics card — a lopsided pairing that makes sense only for specific workloads. Note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay.

Balance and Bottleneck

The defining characteristic of this build is imbalance. The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 86 places it firmly in the upper tier of all processors in the database, while the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus sits at exactly 50 — the median of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 68 lands closer to the CPU than the GPU because the i7-13700F's multi-core scores drag the average upward, but that figure flatters the gaming experience this pairing can deliver.

In any GPU-bound workload, the Arc A380E is the hard limiter. Its raw specifications explain why: 1024 shading units, 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth on a 96-bit bus. Compare that to the CPU's capability — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15058 — and the mismatch becomes obvious. The i7-13700F can feed instructions to a far faster GPU than this. Frame-rate scaling in GPU-limited scenarios will plateau regardless of how much CPU headroom exists, and the 3DMark thread-scaling data backs this up: the CPU's score climbs from 1092 single-threaded to 10716 at max threads, a nearly tenfold scaling that will go largely unused in games where the A380E runs out of graphics capability first.

The reverse bottleneck — CPU limiting GPU — essentially never happens here. Even at low resolutions where CPU demand peaks, the 13700F's single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 4532 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to keep a 50th-percentile GPU saturated. For CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, rendering, and data compression, the A380E is irrelevant and the pairing behaves like a strong 16-core workstation with a display adapter attached.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of this build is well documented. The i7-13700F posts a 3DMark max-threads score of 10716, scaling from 2178 at 2 threads, 4258 at 4 threads, and 7136 at 8 threads — a curve that shows the hybrid architecture keeping near-linear scaling through the mid-thread range before tapering. Cinebench results span generations consistently: 3235 multi / 456 single in R15, 13482 multi / 1903 single in R20, and 32101 multi / 4532 single in R23. Geekbench reports 15058 multi-core and 2225 single-core, and PassMark reports 38369 multithreaded and 4121 single-threaded, alongside physics at 2236.

The average benchmark score of 39009 puts the 13700F within a fraction of a percent of its nearest rivals. The AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39215, just 0.5% ahead; the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS averages 39325, 0.8% ahead; and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is 1.2% ahead at 39485. Only the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T sits below it at 38561, 1.2% behind. In practical terms, these four chips are statistically interchangeable in aggregate performance, which tells you the 13700F competes in a dense mid-to-upper cluster where specific workload behavior matters more than the average.

The GPU side is the weak spot in the data as well as the hardware. The Arc A380E has an avgBenchmarkScore of 0 and an empty benchmarks array in this database — no 3DMark, no render tests, nothing. The only positioning signal available is its percentileVsAllGpus of 50. That absence means the combined performance picture rests almost entirely on the CPU's measured results, with the GPU's contribution estimated from its 50th-percentile placement.

CPU Analysis

The i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. It runs a 2.10 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP rating. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 30 MB of shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, uses Intel Socket 1700, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. As an "F" variant, it has no integrated graphics — which matters here, because the A380E is the only display output in the system, and its four DisplayPort 2.0 connectors are the only way to drive a monitor. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited.

The benchmark scores translate directly into workload capability. The 3DMark thread-scaling curve — 2178, 4258, 7136, 10716 at 2, 4, 8, and max threads — shows that the chip keeps adding performance as software parallelizes, which is exactly what rendering and compilation want. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 indicates genuinely capable throughput for 3D rendering and video encoding, while the single-core score of 4532 and Geekbench single-core of 2225 confirm strong per-thread responsiveness for applications and older games that lean on one or two threads.

The PassMark subscores round out the picture: integer math at 141370, floating point at 100422, data compression at 471838, encryption at 26956, extended instructions (AVX-class work) at 28295, and string sorting at 49974. These are workstation-grade numbers in aggregate. Against its rivals, the 13700F sits within roughly a percent of the AMD EPYC 4245P, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, and Ryzen AI 7 450 in average score — a dead heat that means buyers choosing among these parts are choosing on platform features (the 13700F's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility and PCIe Gen 5) rather than raw performance.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database, so everything in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded gameplay.

The honest estimate is that gaming is limited by the Arc A380E in nearly every modern title. With a 50th-percentile GPU — 1024 shading units, 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, and 186 GB/s of bandwidth — the expectations should be set at 1080p with reduced settings for recent AAA games, and the 6 GB frame buffer will be the first wall hit as textures and resolutions climb. At 1440p and 4K, or with ray tracing engaged through the card's 8 RT cores, frame rates will fall off sharply; the hardware simply lacks the compute and bandwidth to carry those loads. The CPU's contribution is effectively invisible in these scenarios, because a chip posting 10716 in 3DMark max-threads and 1092 single-threaded will never be the constraint against this class of GPU.

Where the pairing plays to its strengths is CPU-heavy, GPU-light gaming: esports titles, older games, and simulation or strategy games where the 13700F's strong single-thread scores and 24 threads can express themselves. In those cases, high-refresh 1080p play is a realistic expectation, since the bottleneck shifts toward the processor — territory where this CPU is comfortably in the top quartile of the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Only partially viable. The 13700F's single-thread strength (4532 in Cinebench R23, 2225 in Geekbench) can push high frame rates, but the A380E's 50th-percentile positioning and 4.096 TFLOPS of compute cap realistic high-refresh play to lighter titles at 1080p. Modern AAA games at high settings are not this build's lane.

Streaming: Mixed. The 24 threads and 15058 Geekbench multi-core score give ample capacity for encoding alongside gameplay, but the GPU cannot render demanding games at settings that make a stream look good. Streaming lighter or older titles is feasible; streaming AAA content will struggle at both ends despite the CPU being ready.

Video editing: The CPU carries this workload. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32101 and PassMark multithreaded result of 38369 handle timeline scrubbing, encoding, and export well. The 6 GB of GPU memory and modest compute mean GPU-accelerated effects should be used sparingly, but CPU-driven editing workflows are well served.

3D rendering: Strong on the CPU side and weak on the GPU side. CPU rendering is supported by the 13482 Cinebench R20 multi-core score and the 10716 3DMark max-threads result, placing the chip within a percent of rivals like the EPYC 4245P. GPU rendering on the A380E's 1024 shaders and 186 GB/s bandwidth is not practical for production work.

Software development: Excellent fit. The 16 cores and 24 threads crush parallel builds, the 2225 Geekbench single-core score keeps IDEs and interpreters snappy, and PassMark string sorting at 49974 plus integer math at 141370 reflect the workloads developers actually run. The A380E is irrelevant here beyond driving displays.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best way on the CPU side. Documents, browsing, and web applications barely engage this processor, and the four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs on the GPU support multi-monitor study setups. The 6 GB frame buffer handles video playback and general desktop compositing without issue.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A380E is an Alchemist-generation (Arc 3) part built on TSMC's 6 nm process, using the DG2-128 chip. The die measures 157 mm² and packs 7200 million transistors at a density of 45.9M per mm². It runs at 2000 MHz on both base and boost clocks — a flat frequency profile with no boost headroom — with memory at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The specification sheet tells the story of an entry-level card. The 6 GB of GDDR6 rides a 96-bit bus delivering 186.0 GB/s, which is the most constraining number on the page — bandwidth, not shading power, is typically the first ceiling an entry GPU hits. Raster throughput is 64.00 GPixel/s and texture fill is 128.0 GTexel/s from 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs. Compute stands at 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, doubling to 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 rate. Ray tracing exists — 8 RT cores — but at this scale, RT is a checkbox feature rather than a usable mode in demanding games. No tensor cores are listed in the database.

The physical and power design is the card's practical strength: a single-slot, 20 mm-wide board drawing 75 W with no power connectors, 254 mm long, on a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, with a suggested PSU of just 250 W. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Note its production status: End-of-life, superseded by Battlemage. With no benchmark scores in the database and a launch MSRP not listed, the only performance anchor is the 50th-percentile placement — a middle-of-the-database result that pairs oddly with a top-quartile CPU. For rendering work, treat this as a display and light-compute adapter, not a render engine.

Who Should Build It

The target user is someone whose work is CPU-bound and whose graphics needs are minimal. Software developers are the clearest fit: the 15058 Geekbench multi-core score and 24 threads deliver fast builds, and the locked multiplier and 65 W TDP make it a low-drama office machine. Students and small-business workstations benefit the same way — heavy multitasking, documents, light content work, multi-monitor setups via the four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Content creators focused on CPU-driven video editing can also use this pairing, since the 32101 Cinebench R23 multi-core score carries encoding and export. What this build is not for: gamers targeting 1440p or 4K, anyone wanting ray-traced gameplay, or 3D artists relying on GPU rendering. The A380E's 6 GB frame buffer and 186 GB/s bandwidth disqualify it from those roles. Casual and esports gamers at 1080p are the only gaming audience this serves. Industries that fit: development studios provisioning workstations, offices needing long compile or analysis runs, and budget-conscious creators whose tools run on the CPU. Because the 13700F has no integrated graphics, the A380E cannot be omitted — but a buyer happy with this CPU should regard the GPU as a placeholder with a clear upgrade path over the PCIe Gen 5 slot.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing Intel's Core i7-13700F — a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S desktop processor released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $359 — with Intel's Arc A380E, an Alchemist-generation entry GPU on Socket 1700 platform support via the CPU's Intel Socket 1700. The CPU occupies the 86th percentile of all processors; the GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs; the combined percentile is 68.

That combined figure describes a build whose tier is defined entirely by its processor. In aggregate ranking it lands in the upper third of the database, but the composition matters: this performs like a strong CPU-only workstation, not like a balanced gaming desktop. The pairing makes sense as a compute-first machine with incidental graphics capability, and the A380E's 75 W, single-slot, connector-free design reinforces that reading — it is a low-commitment display solution attached to a serious processor.

FAQ

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: Only for lighter titles. The Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs with 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 6 GB of VRAM, so modern AAA games at high settings are beyond it. The CPU is never the problem — its 1092 3DMark single-thread score and 10716 max-threads score are top-tier — but the GPU caps realistic play to 1080p in less demanding games.

Q: Does the Core i7-13700F have integrated graphics?

A: No. As an "F" variant it has no integrated graphics, so the Arc A380E and its four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs are the only way to connect a display.

Q: How does the i7-13700F compare to rival CPUs?

A: It is within roughly a percent of its nearest rivals in average benchmark score: 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4245P, 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, 1.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, and 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T. These chips are effectively tied in aggregate performance.

Q: Can the Arc A380E do ray tracing?

A: It has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so ray tracing is technically available. With its entry-level compute and 186 GB/s of memory bandwidth, it is not practical for ray-traced gaming at playable settings in demanding titles.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 W, which reflects its modest 75 W TDP and lack of power connectors. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP rating, so overall power demands are low for this performance class.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is unlocked-flagged as false in the database, so the 5.20 GHz boost clock is the ceiling.

Q: Are the FPS figures in this article measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile placements.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700F

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds