SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc A380E pairing represents a distinct desktop configuration that marries a high-end processing unit with an entry-level graphics solution. The data indicates a substantial imbalance in raw capability between the two components, with the CPU performing in the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This analysis examines the platform foundation, the measured benchmark performance, and the realistic usage scenarios that such a combination can support, based exclusively on the provided benchmark data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, utilizing the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more prevalent DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on availability and platform costs. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage devices and expansion cards.

The Intel Arc A380E GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at the older standard's speeds. The GPU itself has a 75 W TDP and carries no power connectors, drawing all its power from the motherboard slot. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 250 W, which is modest given the CPU's 125 W TDP. This combination suggests that a standard mid-range power supply will provide ample headroom, and the system does not require specialized high-wattage units.

The CPU has a launch MSRP of $294 and features an unlocked multiplier, making it a candidate for overclocking on compatible Z-series motherboards. For a sensible next upgrade path, the data suggests that the platform is well-suited for a GPU replacement. The CPU's 90th percentile performance far exceeds the GPU's 50th percentile, meaning that a user could swap the Arc A380E for a significantly more powerful graphics card without bottlenecking the processor. The 250 W PSU suggestion indicates that the current GPU is the primary power consumer, and upgrading it would necessitate a corresponding PSU increase, but the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and strong CPU scores would support such a move.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark results paint a picture of a highly capable processor. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14600KF scores 32544 in multi-core and 4594 in single-core tests. The multi-core score places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, and it edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by a 0.3% delta, while leading the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8%. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is the only rival that surpasses it, with a 0.8% higher average score. The Geekbench results reinforce this standing, with multi-core and single-core scores of 17085 and 2445, respectively.

The GPU benchmarks are notably absent from the data, with no scores listed for the Intel Arc A380E. The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 50, indicating it sits exactly in the middle of the performance distribution. The combined percentile for the system is 70, which reflects the dominance of the CPU in the overall benchmark picture. The PassMark tests on the CPU show strong integer math performance at 125982, floating-point math at 93048, and multithread scores at 38697. The data compression score of 485140 and encryption score of 27608 further demonstrate the CPU's computational breadth. The single-thread PassMark score of 4273 aligns with the Cinebench single-core results, confirming that the CPU excels in lightly-threaded workloads as well as heavily-parallel tasks.

The gap between the CPU's top-tier performance and the GPU's mid-range placement is the defining characteristic of this build. Benchmark results indicate that the processor can handle any computational task thrown at it, while the graphics card will be the limiting factor in any GPU-accelerated workload. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 49394, which is well above the nearest rival's average scores, reinforcing its position in the top decile of processors.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A380E's 50th percentile GPU standing suggests that high-refresh gaming at 1080p with ultra settings is not achievable for demanding titles. The CPU's 4594 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures that frame generation and physics calculations are not bottlenecks, but the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM will cap frame rates. Users should expect moderate settings for smooth high-refresh gameplay, with the CPU having ample headroom to support future GPU upgrades.

Streaming: The i5-14600KF's 20 threads and strong multi-core score of 32544 in Cinebench R23 provide excellent headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant performance degradation, as the data shows a 90th percentile ranking that leaves little to be desired in processing power. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores and lower compute capability means that hardware encoding offload will be limited, but the CPU can easily compensate.

Video Editing: The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 27608 and multithread score of 38697 indicate robust performance for video editing tasks such as rendering timelines and applying effects. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache facilitate rapid data access for editing software. The GPU's 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM can handle 1080p editing with proxies, but 4K timelines will stress the 50th percentile GPU, potentially causing slowdowns in GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13668 and R15 multi-core score of 3280 indicating exceptional rendering throughput. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow for efficient parallel processing in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The GPU's 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores provide some acceleration for GPU rendering, but its 50th percentile rank means that final renders will heavily favor the CPU, which is well-suited for this workload.

Software Development: Developers will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile performance, particularly in compilation tasks that are multi-threaded. The PassMark integer math score of 125982 and find prime numbers score of 161 show strong computational throughput for code compilation and testing. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups for coding environments. The ECC memory support is a notable advantage for long-running build servers.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for typical student and office tasks. The CPU's single-core performance of 4594 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's modest capabilities are sufficient for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 250 W suggested PSU keeps power consumption low, making this an efficient system for daily academic or professional use, though the CPU's high performance is underutilized in such scenarios.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this system is a professional or enthusiast who prioritizes CPU-bound workloads and has a limited need for GPU acceleration. Content creators working in CPU-based rendering, video editing with proxy workflows, or software developers compiling large codebases will find the i5-14600KF's 90th percentile performance highly beneficial. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, is beaten by 0.3%, making this Intel chip a slight leader in its class.

For gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations, this build can serve as a foundation that allows for a future GPU upgrade without changing the platform. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 20 threads ensure that no game will be CPU-limited, but the Arc A380E will restrict high-fidelity gaming. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded office applications, database queries, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 38697, while the GPU's 50th percentile is adequate for standard business displays.

The system is less suitable for users whose primary tasks are GPU-intensive, such as 3D artists using GPU renderers or gamers seeking maximum frame rates. In those cases, the GPU would need to be replaced, and the 250 W PSU suggestion indicates that a more powerful GPU would require additional power infrastructure. As it stands, the build is a CPU-centric workstation with a basic display output capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in the Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, providing high single-thread responsiveness. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which facilitates rapid data access across all cores.

Benchmark scores demonstrate the CPU's versatility. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 places it in the 90th percentile, with a 0.3% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and a 0.8% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The single-core score of 4594 ensures that legacy and lightly-threaded applications still perform exceptionally well. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17085 and single-core score of 2445 corroborate these findings. In PassMark tests, the CPU achieves 125982 in integer math and 93048 in floating-point math, demonstrating strong ALU and FPU throughput. The data encryption score of 27608 and compression score of 485140 indicate robust performance in security and archiving tasks.

The CPU's 125 W TDP is manageable for most air coolers, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking to push performance further. The ECC memory support is a differentiator, making this CPU suitable for entry-level workstations where data integrity is paramount. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, outperforms it by 0.8%, but the i5-14600KF edges out the Ryzen 9 7900, showing that it competes favorably in its segment.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has a 0.3% higher average benchmark score than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, with scores of 49394 versus 49228.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A380E sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating mid-range performance.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600KF supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A380E is 250 W, which accounts for the GPU's 75 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: Which rival CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a higher average score of 49796, which is 0.8% above the i5-14600KF's 49394.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a pronounced imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 90th percentile performance vastly outpaces the GPU's 50th percentile, meaning that the Arc A380E is the definitive bottleneck in any GPU-accelerated workload. In gaming, the CPU's single-core score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations are never a limitation, but the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM will restrict frame rates to modest levels at best.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the system performs at its peak. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and PassMark multithread score of 38697 indicate that these tasks will execute with minimal delays. The GPU's mid-range standing has no impact on these workloads, making the CPU the sole driver of performance.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects the system's overall capability, but it is skewed heavily by the CPU. A user upgrading the GPU to a higher-percentile model would see a dramatic increase in the system's combined percentile, as the CPU would no longer be held back. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in all graphics-intensive scenarios, while the CPU is the limiting factor only in terms of power consumption and heat output, given its 125 W TDP.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the Intel Core i5-14600KF processor with the Intel Arc A380E graphics card. The CPU is a high-end 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) part with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process.

The system's combined percentile is 70, placing it above the majority of desktop configurations. However, this figure is almost entirely attributable to the CPU's 90th percentile ranking, while the GPU's 50th percentile is the average. The pairing is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with a basic graphics capability, suitable for tasks that leverage the processor's multi-threaded performance. The Intel Arc A380E provides display output through 4x DisplayPort 2.0 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it functional for standard graphical interfaces and light gaming.

The build class is desktop, and the components are physically compatible, with the GPU's single-slot design and 254 mm length fitting into most standard cases. The absence of power connectors on the GPU simplifies installation, and the 250 W suggested PSU keeps the system power-efficient. This is a balanced platform for users who need substantial CPU power without the need for high-end graphics.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is based on the DG2-128 chip, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm². The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz for an effective 15.5 Gbps. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The shader configuration includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 8.192 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. These specifications place the GPU in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating mid-range performance. The lack of benchmark scores for this GPU makes direct performance comparisons impossible, but the percentile ranking provides a relative measure.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. It has a 75 W TDP and requires no power connectors, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs. The production status is end-of-life, with the predecessor being Xe Graphics and the successor being Battlemage, indicating this is a transitional product. For rendering tasks, the 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units provide modest acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate games and applications, but the 50th percentile rank suggests that it will struggle with high-resolution or high-detail workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 90th percentile performance ensures that it will not be a limiting factor in gaming, providing high single-thread performance of 4594 in Cinebench R23 and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The GPU's 50th percentile standing, with 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB VRAM, suggests that gaming performance will be modest.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU is likely to be the bottleneck in demanding titles, with frame rates expected to be in the mid-range. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but may be exceeded in games with high-resolution texture packs. The 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 96-bit bus are limiting factors for memory-intensive scenes. The GPU's 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but performance will be low due to the overall compute power.

At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's limitations become more pronounced, and users would need to reduce settings to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's performance is sufficient to support high-refresh monitors, but the GPU cannot deliver the required frame rates. The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for esports titles or older games at 1080p with adjusted settings, rather than modern AAA games at high detail. The estimated frame rates are based on the GPU's 50th percentile rank and the CPU's high single-thread score, but actual results will vary by game and driver optimization.