SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count 14th-generation Intel processor with a current-generation Blackwell GPU, yet the benchmark data reveals a stark performance disparity between the two components. The CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s single 3DMark Steel Nomad score places it in the 19th percentile, a discrepancy that defines this build’s character. This analysis relies strictly on the FACT PACK; no measured FPS data exists for this combination, so all game performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors this build to the LGA1700 ecosystem. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more common DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The platform supports ECC memory, a feature often relevant for workstation-class reliability. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the RTX 5080 SUPER’s PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 watts, while the GPU’s TDP is 415 watts. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage for the GPU, so PSU headroom must be considered qualitatively: the combined thermal load of a 125W processor and a 415W graphics card demands a robust power supply with a 16-pin connector, as specified on the GPU. The power connectors for the GPU are 1x 16-pin, meaning the PSU must support this modern connector standard.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform itself is near its end of life, as Socket 1700 has no future CPU generations listed. A user seeking more CPU performance would need to move to a different socket entirely. However, within the current build, the GPU is the clear bottleneck in gaming workloads, so upgrading the GPU would yield no benefit given the 19th percentile score. The more logical path is to replace the motherboard and CPU together, moving to a platform that supports newer processors, while potentially reusing the DDR5 memory if already adopted. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which could extend its useful life before a full platform change.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivers 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective). The GPU core runs at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz.

Compute resources include 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. Ray tracing is handled by 84 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 336 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The sole benchmark score for this GPU is 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which yields a 19th percentile rank among all GPUs. This is a surprisingly low position for a card with such high specifications. The nearest rivals illustrate the issue: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3,163 (2.8% higher), Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3,182 (3.4% higher), and the GeForce GTX 860M scores 2,967 (3.6% lower). The RTX 5080 SUPER is effectively tied with these much older or lower-tier cards in this specific test, which suggests the 3DMark Steel Nomad score may not capture the GPU’s true rendering capability, or the benchmark result is anomalous. For rendering workloads, the 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are objectively high-end specifications, but the benchmark data does not support a strong performance claim.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are extensive and consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,280 multi-core and 462 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 13,668 multi-core and 1,929 single-core. Cinebench R23 yields 32,544 multi-core and 4,594 single-core. Geekbench scores are 17,085 multi-core and 2,445 single-core. PassMark results include multi-thread at 38,697, single-thread at 4,273, integer math at 125,982, floating-point math at 93,048, data compression at 485,140, data encryption at 27,608, extended instructions at 28,785, find prime numbers at 161, physics at 2,449, and random string sorting at 52,056.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49,394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228 (0.3% lower), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49,196 (0.4% lower), Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48,995 (0.8% lower), and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49,796 (0.8% higher). This indicates the i5-14600KF is essentially performance-parity with these competitors, with the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 being the only one to edge it out, and by less than 1%.

The GPU’s single score of 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad places it in the 19th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 3,075. The combined percentile for this build is 55, reflecting the CPU’s high standing pulling up the GPU’s low score. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 19th percentile. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU score suggests it would significantly limit gaming frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Does the RTX 5080 SUPER support the latest graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, as listed in its API specifications.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s and memory clocked at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900’s score of 49,228, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU’s benchmark score competitive with other cards?

A: The GPU scores 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and 3.4% lower than the Intel Arc Pro B60, placing it in the 19th percentile.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 415 watts. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The CPU also supports ECC memory.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank means it is among the top 10% of all processors, while the GPU’s 19th percentile rank means it is in the bottom fifth of all GPUs. In gaming workloads, the GPU would be the limiting factor, as the CPU’s high multi-core and single-core scores (32,544 and 4,594 in Cinebench R23) are more than sufficient to feed a faster graphics card. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075, which is lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, indicates that frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios would be modest.

The CPU’s performance in PassMark integer math (125,982) and floating-point math (93,048) suggests it excels in CPU-intensive tasks like physics simulations or data processing. In contrast, the GPU’s raw compute of 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 is high on paper, but its benchmark score does not reflect this. The bottleneck analysis is clear: the GPU limits gaming performance, while the CPU is over-provisioned for most games. For non-gaming workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering that use the GPU, the low percentile score would similarly cap performance. FPS scaling, estimated from the scores, would show that increasing resolution would further strain the GPU, while the CPU would have headroom to spare.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks but have modest GPU demands. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, students running multi-threaded applications, or small business workstations handling data analysis. The 14 cores and 20 threads, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, provide strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench scores. Content creators working on CPU-based rendering or video encoding would benefit from the high multi-core score of 32,544 in Cinebench R23.

For gamers, this build is not recommended for high-refresh-rate gaming at any resolution, given the GPU’s 19th percentile rank. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is ample for large textures, but the low benchmark score suggests it would struggle to maintain high frame rates. The build is better suited for professional workstations where the GPU is used for display output rather than intensive rendering. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 24 GB memory could be useful for large machine learning models that fit in VRAM, but the compute performance indicated by the 3DMark score is a concern.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, with ECC capability. The CPU uses Socket 1700 and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Benchmark scores place this CPU in the 90th percentile, with an average score of 49,394. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, scores 49,228, a 0.3% difference, showing the i5-14600KF is at the top of its class. The single-core score of 4,594 in Cinebench R23 indicates excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications, while the multi-core score of 32,544 shows strong parallel performance. PassMark results further detail the strengths: integer math at 125,982 and floating-point math at 93,048 are high, while data compression at 485,140 suggests fast file archiving. The CPU’s TDP of 125 watts is modest relative to its performance, and the unlocked multiplier allows for additional tuning. The release date is October 2023, with a launch MSRP of $294.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i5-14600KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The CPU is a high-tier performer at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is a low-tier performer at the 19th percentile, based on available benchmark data. The combined percentile is 55, indicating a system that is roughly average overall, but with extreme variance between components.

The CPU and GPU are both current-generation parts: the CPU from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series (Raptor Lake Refresh) and the GPU from NVIDIA’s GeForce 50-series (Blackwell 2.0). The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide strong multi-threading, while the GPU’s 24 GB of GDDR7 memory is a high-capacity feature. However, the GPU’s benchmark score of 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad is its only data point and it underperforms relative to the CPU. The build’s overall tier is defined by the CPU’s strength, but the GPU drags down gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. This is a workstation-leaning configuration where the CPU does the heavy lifting.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 19th percentile score indicates it cannot support high-refresh gaming at competitive frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 4,594 would not compensate for the GPU’s low 3DMark performance, so this build is unsuitable for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors in modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a multi-core score of 32,544 in Cinebench R23, can handle software encoding while gaming. However, the GPU’s low performance would limit the game’s frame rate, making the streaming experience poor overall.

Video editing: CPU-based editing in software like Premiere Pro would benefit from the high multi-core score, but GPU-accelerated effects and rendering would be slow due to the GPU’s low percentile rank. The 24 GB VRAM helps with large timelines, but the compute performance is a bottleneck.

3D rendering: In GPU-based renderers, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 is high on paper, but the 3DMark score of 3,075 suggests real-world rendering performance would be below expectations. CPU-based rendering would be faster, given the CPU’s 90th percentile rank.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU’s integer math score of 125,982 and multi-thread score of 38,697 in PassMark indicate fast compilation times. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this build a good value for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,273 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness. Office suites and web browsing would be highly responsive, and the GPU’s limitations would not affect typical productivity tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds