SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 with the Intel Arc A380E is a desktop pairing that occupies a specific middle ground in the benchmark database. The CPU is a high-performing 14-core Raptor Lake part that lands at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 69, indicating a system that is substantially stronger on the processor side than on the graphics side. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is well-suited for high-refresh gaming due to its strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4049. However, the Arc A380E, with its 50th percentile GPU ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, will likely be the limiting factor at high refresh rates. Estimates suggest this pairing can handle 1080p esports titles at moderate settings, but reaching high refresh rates in demanding AAA titles is unlikely.

Streaming: The 14 cores and 20 threads of the i5-13600 provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting while maintaining gameplay performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 indicates that the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without significant degradation. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores and its modest compute capabilities suggest that hardware-accelerated encoding, while present via Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture, will be secondary to CPU-based encoding in this configuration.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both strong multi-core performance and decent graphics acceleration. The i5-13600’s Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11180 position it well for timeline editing and rendering in software like Premiere Pro. The Arc A380E’s 6 GB GDDR6 memory with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects and previews, but the GPU’s 50th percentile standing means it will not accelerate all tasks equally. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with data-heavy editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU is the clear workhorse here, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2683 and a Passmark floating-point math score of 81892. These numbers suggest strong performance in CPU-based rendering applications like Blender’s Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU, with 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores, can contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 output is modest compared to higher-tier discrete GPUs. The 75 W TDP of the GPU also indicates limited sustained compute headroom.

Software development: The i5-13600 excels in compilation tasks and parallel workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 111044 and data encryption score of 22182 demonstrate strong throughput for code compilation, encryption, and data processing. The 20 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the 88th percentile CPU ranking confirms this processor is well above average for developer workstations. The GPU’s role in development is minimal, though its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures modern graphics APIs are available for testing.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU’s efficiency at 65 W TDP makes it a reasonable choice for a desktop that occasionally handles heavier tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 383972 and random string sorting score of 42040 suggest rapid file operations and spreadsheet performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, and the 50th percentile GPU ranking means the Arc A380E is average for general desktop use.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600 achieves an average benchmark score of 44240, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, which scores 44309, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core i9-13950HX is also close at 44342 (-0.2%), followed by the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 (-0.5%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 (-0.7%). This places the i5-13600 effectively at parity with these high-end mobile and desktop parts, within a 0.7% margin.

The GPU, Intel Arc A380E, has no benchmark scores listed and an average benchmark score of 0, but its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, indicating it sits exactly at the median of all graphics cards in the database. The combined percentile for the full build is 69, which reflects the CPU’s high standing pulling up the GPU’s median performance.

In specific CPU tests, the i5-13600 shows strong scaling from single to multi-core. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 is approximately 7 times the single-core score of 3758, indicating efficient use of its 14 cores. The Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 compared to single-thread score of 4049 shows a similar ratio. The data suggests that the CPU will maintain high performance under all-core loads, which is critical for rendering and compilation tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is typical of Intel’s hybrid design, where performance cores and efficiency cores work together to balance throughput and power consumption.

The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a processor with this level of performance. The benchmark scores reflect a well-balanced design: the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1578 and multi-core score of 11180 indicate that the CPU does not sacrifice single-threaded performance for multi-threaded capability. The Passmark physics score of 1782 and find prime numbers score of 109 suggest strong computational efficiency in scientific workloads.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. This flexibility is beneficial for workstation users who want to balance cost and performance. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high bandwidth for modern storage devices and GPUs, though the Arc A380E uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is more than sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz already provides high single-thread performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a basic display output option, which is useful for troubleshooting or light workloads without the discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the CPU capable of driving high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU will constrain performance at higher settings. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will benefit from the 14-core processor, while the GPU provides a baseline for hardware acceleration.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant gains from the 20 threads, and the Passmark encryption score of 22182 indicates strong performance for secure development environments. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the multi-core power for simulations and data analysis, while the 65 W TDP keeps power costs manageable.

Small business workstations that handle data processing, financial modeling, or database management can leverage the Passmark data compression score of 383972 for rapid file operations. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking is sufficient for office applications and light graphical work, but it is not designed for heavy 3D workloads. The build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU throughput over graphical fidelity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in their memory choice. The dual-channel memory bus is standard, and ECC support adds reliability for workstation tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides future-proofing for high-speed NVMe drives, though current storage devices using PCIe 4.0 will operate without bottleneck.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 65 W, indicating that a modest power supply can handle this system. The Arc A380E is a single-slot card with no power connectors, drawing power directly from the PCIe slot, which simplifies installation. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, so upgrades within the same socket are limited on the GPU side.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger discrete GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 88th percentile CPU ranking means it can support higher-tier graphics cards without becoming the bottleneck in most scenarios. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU using this interface would be fully utilized. However, the socket 1700 is tied to the 13th generation, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a motherboard change.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with a DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 8 RT cores for ray tracing. It lacks dedicated tensor cores, which limits AI-accelerated workloads.

The memory configuration is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, equivalent to 15.5 Gbps effective. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, resulting in a pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 128.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The 50th percentile GPU ranking indicates that this card delivers average performance across the database. In real-world rendering, the 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with moderate textures, but it may struggle with high-resolution assets. The 8 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the modest compute throughput means ray-traced effects will be limited to lighter scenes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance in this pairing. The i5-13600 sits at the 88th percentile among CPUs, while the Arc A380E is at the 50th percentile among GPUs. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, such as gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU will be waiting on the GPU in most frame-rendering scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will operate near its full potential. The Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy all-core loads without throttling, thanks to its 65 W TDP and efficient architecture.

The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance, as the system overall is above average but not exceptional. For gaming, the FPS scaling will be limited by the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. In productivity tasks that are CPU-bound, the system will perform near the CPU’s 88th percentile ranking. Users should match workloads to the CPU’s strengths to avoid underutilizing the processor.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a high-end 13th generation Intel Core processor with a mid-range entry-level Intel Arc GPU. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-S part with 14 cores and 20 threads, designed for demanding multi-threaded tasks. The GPU is an Alchemist generation part from Intel’s Arc 3 series, targeting entry-level gaming and basic content creation.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 69, places this system in the upper-middle range of all desktop configurations. The CPU alone is in the top 12% of all processors, while the GPU is exactly average. This makes the build a strong choice for CPU-centric tasks, but a weaker option for graphics-heavy applications. The 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP combine for a low-power system that is efficient and easy to cool.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44240, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, 0.5% lower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-threaded performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3758, and the Passmark single-thread score is 4049, indicating strong performance for tasks that rely on a single core.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A380E has 8 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is this build suitable for 3D rendering?

A: The CPU is well-suited for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11180. The GPU can assist with some tasks, but its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is limited.

Q: What is the power requirement for this system?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Intel Core i5-13600 with the Intel Arc A380E combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and Passmark single-thread score of 4049 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it performs around the median of all GPUs.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the Arc A380E is likely to deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but newer AAA games will require reduced settings to maintain smooth performance. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p, but higher resolutions will exceed its capacity. The GPU’s 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, which may cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates even at medium settings, as its pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 128.0 GTexel/s are below what modern games demand for high resolutions. The CPU would not be the limiting factor here, as it can handle the game logic and physics calculations with ease. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU.

For esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the CPU’s high single-thread performance will allow for high frame rates if the GPU can keep up. The Passmark physics score of 1782 suggests good game physics processing. However, the GPU’s moderate compute capabilities will cap the maximum frame rate. Users should expect this build to be a CPU-first system where gaming performance is secondary to productivity tasks.