SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER represents a stark contrast in hardware tiers. The data indicates the CPU is a high-performing desktop processor, while the GPU occupies a much lower performance percentile despite its modern architecture. This pairing creates a significant imbalance where the graphics card is the primary limiting factor in most workloads. Benchmark results show the CPU scoring in the 88th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 19th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined system percentile is 54, reflecting the drag of the underperforming GPU. Users should note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions are estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory, making it viable for workstation tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output capability, though the discrete GPU in this build supersedes it.

Benchmark results for the CPU are strong across multiple tests. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 26620 in multi-core and 3758 in single-core. The multi-core score of 26620 indicates substantial parallel processing capability, suitable for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. The single-core score of 3758 demonstrates excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. PassMark results further reinforce this picture: the processor achieves 31725 in multithreaded tests and 4049 in single-thread performance. The data compression score of 383972 and integer math score of 111044 highlight strong throughput for data-heavy operations. Floating-point math reaches 81892, and extended instructions score 23045, suggesting good performance in encryption and specialized workloads.

The processor's average benchmark score is 44240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 (0.2 percent behind), the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 (0.2 percent behind), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (0.5 percent ahead). The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, which is 0.7 percent ahead. These small deltas indicate the i5-13600 sits at a competitive performance level within a narrow band of its peers. The processor's launch MSRP is $255, though this figure does not reflect current market pricing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture graphics card built on a 5 nm TSMC process. It features 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU contains 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. For ray tracing, there are 84 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, there are 336 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, while memory runs at 2000 MHz or 32 Gbps effective. Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute reaches 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 56.28 TFLOPS ratio.

Despite these impressive specifications, the benchmark data tells a different story. The only recorded benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the GPU scores 3075. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER in the 19th percentile of all GPUs, which is exceptionally low for a card with such modern features. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (2.8 percent ahead), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (3.4 percent ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (3.1 percent behind). The GeForce GTX 860M scores 2967, which is 3.6 percent behind. These comparisons place the RTX 5080 SUPER in the same performance class as entry-level and older mobile GPUs, which is a severe limitation for a card with 56.28 TFLOPS of compute power.

The GPU's TDP is 415 W, requiring a dual-slot cooler and a single 16-pin power connector. The card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The launch MSRP is 999 USD. For rendering workloads, the low benchmark score indicates that despite the high VRAM capacity and bandwidth, the actual rasterization performance is poor. The RT and tensor cores are present, but the benchmark suggests they are not delivering expected results in this particular configuration or driver state.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The i5-13600 uses this socket, and the chipset supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing flexibility in memory selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is adequate for a high-bandwidth GPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display option if the discrete GPU has issues. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest, but the RTX 5080 SUPER draws 415 W, making power supply selection critical. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, so users must infer requirements from the GPU's TDP alone.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests replacing the GPU is the priority. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking indicates it has significant headroom, and its nearest rivals—all scoring within 0.7 percent—show it is not a bottleneck. A GPU with a higher benchmark score would better utilize the CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache. The motherboard should support PCIe Gen 5 for the GPU's bus interface, but the CPU's 16 lanes are sufficient. Memory support for DDR5 would maximize bandwidth, though DDR4 remains compatible if the motherboard has that option. The CPU's ECC support is a plus for workstation stability, and the 10 nm process keeps power draw manageable for cooling.

The gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (88 vs 19) is the defining feature of this build. Any upgrade path should focus on the graphics card first, as the CPU can handle significantly more demanding GPUs without becoming a constraint. The platform itself is not outdated, given its PCIe Gen 5 support and dual memory types. Users considering an upgrade should prioritize a GPU with a higher percentile ranking to balance the system.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance but do not prioritize high-end graphics. The i5-13600's 88th percentile CPU score suits content creators, developers, and small business workstations where multi-threaded tasks dominate. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 indicates capability in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark multithread score of 31725 reinforces this, showing strong throughput for parallel workloads. Single-thread performance of 4049 in PassMark and 3758 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with modest settings might find the GPU adequate, but the 19th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with modern titles at high detail. The 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are ample for textures, but the compute performance is low relative to that memory capacity. For rendering workloads, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 is a clear limitation, making this a poor choice for GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU, however, can handle CPU-based rendering well, so users who rely on software renderers might find value.

Students and office users would benefit from the CPU's speed in everyday tasks, though the GPU is overkill for basic productivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could serve for light use, but the discrete GPU adds unnecessary power draw. Small business workstations running databases or financial models would leverage the CPU's data compression score of 383972 and integer math score of 111044. The system is best suited for users who are aware of the GPU's limitations and are building around the CPU's strengths.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 places it in the 19th percentile, meaning it will not sustain high frame rates in demanding titles. Estimated FPS from this score would be low, likely below 60 FPS at 1080p for modern games on high settings. The CPU's single-core score of 3758 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU, but the GPU is the constraint.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 26620 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 can handle encoding workloads while gaming. The GPU's dedicated tensor cores and RT cores are present, but the low benchmark score suggests NVENC performance may not translate to good visual quality. Estimated streaming performance is limited by the GPU's rendering capability.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 383972 and floating-point math score of 81892 support fast timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM can hold large project assets, but the 3DMark score of 3075 indicates slow export rendering. CPU-based rendering in software like HandBrake would be fast, while GPU-accelerated effects would lag.

3D rendering: The CPU's 26620 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 is excellent for CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles. The GPU's low 3075 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggests poor GPU-accelerated rendering performance in applications like Octane or Redshift. Users should rely on the CPU for rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU's 31725 PassMark multithread score and 111044 integer math score speed up code compilation and test execution. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so its low percentile does not hinder this workload. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 4049 in PassMark ensures fast spreadsheet calculations and document processing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle display output, but the discrete GPU adds unnecessary complexity. The system's overall 54th percentile combined score reflects the GPU's drag, but CPU-heavy tasks remain strong.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44240.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 2.8 percent behind the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163) and 3.1 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the GPU's VRAM capacity useful?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, but the low 3DMark score of 3075 suggests this capacity is not effectively utilized.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 54, reflecting the mid-tier overall performance.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i5-13600 includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output option.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across multiple tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results of 26620 multi-core and 3758 single-core are particularly notable. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 31725, single-thread score of 4049, data compression of 383972, data encryption of 22182, extended instructions of 23045, find prime numbers of 109, floating-point math of 81892, integer math of 111044, physics of 1782, and random string sorting of 42040. The average CPU benchmark score is 44240.

The GPU's benchmark data is sparse, with only one test recorded: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 3075. This is the GPU's only data point, and its percentile is 19. The average benchmark score for the GPU is also 3075. The nearest rivals show the GPU is slightly below the Quadro P1000 and Arc Pro B60, but slightly above the GeForce 820A and GTX 860M. The combined picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a low-performing GPU, resulting in a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but struggles with GPU-accelerated workloads.

The percentile positions are stark: the CPU at 88th and the GPU at 19th. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from these benchmark scores. The CPU's strong multi-core and single-core scores suggest it can handle demanding computational tasks, while the GPU's low score suggests it will limit graphics-intensive applications. This imbalance is quantified by the combined percentile of 54, which is closer to the GPU's percentile than the CPU's, indicating the GPU is the dominant factor in overall system performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system featuring the Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is a GeForce 50-series card based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it a high-tier processor, while the GPU's 19th percentile ranking makes it a low-tier graphics card. The combined system percentile is 54, placing it in the mid-tier overall.

The pairing is unusual because the CPU is capable of supporting much higher-performing GPUs. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-13950HX and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, are all within 0.7 percent, confirming its competitive position. The GPU's nearest rivals are entry-level cards, which is a poor fit for a 415 W, 24 GB card. This build would be classified as a desktop system with a strong CPU and weak GPU, making it suitable for CPU-intensive tasks but not for gaming or GPU rendering.

The overall tier from the percentiles is mixed: the CPU is in the top 12 percent of all processors, while the GPU is in the bottom 19 percent. The combined percentile of 54 reflects the GPU's drag on the system. Users should understand that this is not a balanced build; it prioritizes CPU performance at the expense of graphics capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the bottleneck in this system. The CPU's 88th percentile score against the GPU's 19th percentile creates a 69-point gap in favor of the CPU. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (383972 score), integer math (111044), and multi-threaded rendering (26620 in Cinebench R23), the system performs well. In GPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering and gaming, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 limits performance.

The CPU's single-core performance of 4049 in PassMark is more than adequate to feed a GPU, but the GPU's low compute score means it cannot translate CPU data into high frame rates. Estimated FPS for gaming would be low, as the GPU's percentile suggests it performs like a Quadro P1000 or GeForce 820A, which are not gaming-oriented cards. The CPU would not bottleneck the GPU in any scenario; rather, the GPU bottlenecks the CPU by preventing it from demonstrating its full potential in graphics-intensive tasks.

For workloads that use the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 instead of the discrete GPU, the bottleneck shifts. The CPU's 88th percentile ensures fast processing, but the integrated graphics are basic. The discrete GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are wasted in this configuration because the compute performance is low. The system is balanced only in the sense that the CPU and GPU are both from the same generation, but their performance tiers are mismatched. Users should target CPU-heavy applications and avoid GPU-accelerated tasks to get the best from this build.