SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X pairs with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 as a desktop build that combines a high-core-count CPU from 2020 with a current-generation entry-level GPU. The processor sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card lands at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, creating a system whose overall combined percentile is 79. This pairing is notable for the stark contrast between the CPU’s massive multi-threaded throughput and the GPU’s more modest rasterization performance, making it a machine that excels at heavily threaded work but requires careful expectations for high-end gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, using TSMC’s 7 nm process node. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and it has a 105 W TDP. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache, with dual-channel DDR4 memory support providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and the processor offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The chip contains 8,300 million transistors across two 74 mm² dies, and its multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark data shows this processor is a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 26017 in multicore and 1614 in single-core. The Geekbench results are 15233 multicore and 2083 single-core. PassMark multithread score is 45424, with a single-thread score of 3470. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 10810 with 16 threads and 11597 with max threads, while single-thread score is 944. These numbers place it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 5950X is 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8124P, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900F, and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i7-14700. The deltas are tiny, meaning this older CPU still trades blows with modern mid-range and high-end parts.

For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads translate directly into exceptional parallelism. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 indicates strong sustained performance for rendering, compilation, and other heavily threaded tasks that can use all available cores. The single-core score of 1614 is respectable but not class-leading, meaning lightly threaded tasks like older games or simple office applications will perform well but not at the very top tier. The PassMark data compression score of 624347 and integer math score of 185520 suggest rapid file archiving and number-crunching capabilities. The floating-point math score of 100280 reinforces this processor’s suitability for scientific and engineering computations.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system delivers mixed results depending on the title. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3470 in PassMark and 944 in 3DMark single-thread is adequate for most games, but the GPU’s performance is the limiting factor. Measured FPS at 1920x1080 shows Counter-Strike 2 at 163 FPS and Valorant at 375 FPS, which are excellent for esports, but Cyberpunk 2077 at 48 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth high-refresh play. At 2560x1440, esports titles still hit 108 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 320 FPS in Valorant, but AAA games drop to 36 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.

Streaming benefits greatly from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, and the PassMark multithread score of 45424 confirms strong parallel processing. The data encryption score of 39593 and extended instructions score of 40468 further support the ability to handle multiple simultaneous workloads. A streamer can run a game, encode the stream, and manage chat overlays without the CPU becoming a bottleneck.

Video editing is a primary strength of this build. The 16-core processor handles timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks with ease, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score and Geekbench multicore score of 15233. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with GPU-accelerated effects, though the 66th percentile GPU ranking means complex 4K projects with heavy effects may see slower preview renders. The PassMark floating-point math score of 100280 helps with color correction and filter applications.

3D rendering workloads will favor the CPU heavily. The 16 cores and 32 threads are ideal for CPU-based renderers, and the 26017 Cinebench R23 multicore score confirms this is a professional-grade rendering processor. The GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 RT cores provide some acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the RTX 5050’s overall performance is modest compared to the CPU’s capability. Scenes that can split work between CPU and GPU will see good throughput, but GPU-only renders will be limited by the graphics card’s 66th percentile standing.

Software development is another strong use case. The 32 threads accelerate compilation of large codebases, and the PassMark integer math score of 185520 indicates rapid logical operations. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is sufficient for most development tools. The CPU’s benchmark scores suggest minimal wait times for builds, though the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory even for non-gaming tasks.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware. Single-thread performance from the 3470 PassMark score handles document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing without strain. The 16 cores are idle capacity for a machine that will mostly perform light tasks, but the high core count ensures that any background processes, virtual machines, or multitasking scenarios are handled smoothly. The power consumption of 105 W TDP is reasonable for a desktop, though not as efficient as newer, lower-core-count parts.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51947, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong position for a processor released in late 2020, and its nearest rivals show how close the competition is: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52301 (0.7% higher). The Ryzen 9 5950X holds its own against these newer parts, with a spread of less than 1% across all four rivals.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21035, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21153 (0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M at 21237 (1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT at 20713 (1.6% lower), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile at 21379 (1.6% higher). This places the RTX 5050 in a tight cluster of mid-range graphics solutions, with performance deltas of about 1.6% or less compared to its closest competitors.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the RTX 5050 scores 2502 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 90334 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 89381 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results show 17326 in G3D, 9184 in GPU compute, and 66 in DirectX 12. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart significantly. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 66th percentile means the graphics card will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the pair’s rank by FPS is 2461 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 105.4. This indicates a system that performs above average in gaming but is not in the top tier.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional or enthusiast who needs maximum CPU multi-threaded performance but does not require top-tier gaming graphics. Gamers at 1920x1080 will find this system capable for esports titles, with Counter-Strike 2 at 163 FPS and Valorant at 375 FPS, but AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 48 FPS will require lower settings or upscaling. At 2560x1440, the system is better suited for competitive gaming, with Counter-Strike 2 at 108 FPS and Valorant at 320 FPS, but most demanding titles fall below 60 FPS. 4K gaming is generally not viable, as even less demanding games like Minecraft drop to 53 FPS.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit most from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads. The 26017 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 45424 PassMark multithread score are strong indicators of professional-grade throughput. Developers compiling large projects will see reduced build times, and video editors exporting projects will have faster render times, though GPU-accelerated effects may be slower than on higher-tier graphics cards.

Students and small business workstations are well served if the workload involves multitasking, virtualization, or data processing. The 32 threads handle many concurrent applications, and the PassMark data compression score of 624347 indicates efficient file management. For office tasks, the CPU is overkill, but the longevity of a 16-core processor means the system remains relevant for years as software demands increase.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings shows a wide variance across game genres. At 1920x1080, esports titles perform excellently: Valorant hits 375 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 361 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 194 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 163 FPS, and Roblox runs at 211 FPS. These are high-refresh-rate capable numbers. Mid-tier games like Assetto Corsa at 97 FPS, Doom at 122 FPS, and Undisputed at 92 FPS also provide smooth gameplay.

Demanding AAA titles at 1920x1080 struggle to maintain 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 48 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 59 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 24 FPS. The Medium drops to 34 FPS, and Control runs at 68 FPS. At 2560x1440, the numbers decrease: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 33 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator to 48 FPS. Esports titles remain playable, with Valorant at 320 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 108 FPS. At 3840x2160, only a few games remain playable, with Valorant at 256 FPS and Roblox at 80 FPS, while most AAA games drop below 30 FPS.

The data shows the system is best suited for competitive gaming at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. For single-player AAA experiences, the RTX 5050’s performance is insufficient for high refresh rates at ultra settings. The average FPS across all measured games is 105.4, but this is skewed by high-performing esports titles. A more realistic assessment is that this system offers excellent performance for fast-paced multiplayer games and acceptable performance for less demanding single-player titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X’s core and thread count?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, placing it at the 66th percentile. It is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, 1% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, and 1.6% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 79, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 66th percentile.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 60 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 48 FPS. At 2560x1440, it drops to 36 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it runs at 24 FPS. The system cannot achieve 60 FPS in this title at any measured resolution.

Q: What is the RTX 5050’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock is 2572 MHz, and it has 2560 shading units.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5950X perform in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X scores 26017 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1614 in single-core. This places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the pair’s rank by average FPS across all measured games?

A: The pair ranks 2461 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all games of 105.4 at the measured resolutions and settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor in this build. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile create a significant imbalance for graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the FPS scaling across resolutions demonstrates this: at 1920x1080, the average FPS is limited by the GPU’s raw throughput, and as resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU becomes even more constrained. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 48 FPS at 1080p to 24 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU’s pixel-pushing limits.

The CPU is not the bottleneck in gaming scenarios. Its single-thread performance of 3470 in PassMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles. In CPU-heavy games like Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 163 FPS at 1080p, indicating the CPU can handle high frame rates when the GPU allows. However, in games that are more GPU-bound, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS, the CPU has ample headroom while the GPU struggles.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance reverses. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is the star, and the GPU is more than adequate for display output and basic acceleration. The 16-core processor handles rendering and compilation tasks, while the GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 RT cores provide moderate acceleration for supported applications. The bottleneck in these scenarios is rarely the hardware itself, but rather the software’s ability to utilize the CPU’s 32 threads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture, and the GPU is from the GeForce 50-series, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The combined percentile ranking is 79, indicating a system that performs above average compared to all other CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 66th percentile show a clear performance hierarchy, with the processor being the dominant component.

The system’s overall tier is upper-mid-range, driven by the CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s solid but not spectacular gaming capabilities. The average FPS across all measured games is 105.4, and the pair ranks 2461 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top half of all tested configurations. This is a build that prioritizes computational throughput over pure gaming frame rates, making it suitable for workstations that also need to play games at moderate settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB207 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process node. It contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, with a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz or 20 Gbps effective. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The shading units number 2560, with 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs. There are 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 13.17 TFLOPS FP16, with pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x8. The TDP is 130 W, with a dual-slot cooler and a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Benchmark results show the RTX 5050 scores 2502 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 90334 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 89381 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results are 17326 in G3D, 9184 in GPU compute, and 66 in DirectX 12. These scores place it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. The nearest rivals are all within 1.6% of its performance, indicating a tightly competitive segment. For rendering, the GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 RT cores provide moderate performance for real-time rendering and ray-traced effects, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus limit high-resolution texture work. The 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may cause stuttering in 4K with high-resolution textures.