SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a modern desktop configuration built around a high-end 8-core processor and a mid-range discrete graphics card. This analysis examines the benchmark data to determine the strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases for this specific combination, focusing on measured performance across synthetic tests and real-world gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It utilizes a 4 nm process node from TSMC, containing 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The chip features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This is a 65 W TDP part, indicating a power-efficient design that still delivers substantial performance.

The cache hierarchy is notable: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, along with ECC memory support. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), and it has no integrated graphics, making the discrete GPU mandatory.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 94th percentile versus all CPUs, which is a strong showing. The average benchmark score is 69,996. Comparing to nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly contested field: the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70,163 (0.2% higher), the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69,355 (0.9% lower). This means the 9700F sits essentially at parity with these high-end alternatives, trading places within a 1% margin.

Looking at specific workloads, the single-thread score is 4,691, which is crucial for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multithread score of 36,470 indicates strong parallel performance, though it is lower than the average benchmark score would suggest. In integer math, the score is 120,788, while floating-point math scores 77,955. Data compression scores 421,988, and data encryption scores 21,488. Extended instructions score 33,688, and random string sorting scores 45,890. The find prime numbers test scores 183, and physics scores 2,122.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in scenarios that benefit from high single-thread performance, such as gaming and everyday productivity. The 8-core/16-thread configuration handles multi-tasking and content creation well, though the 65 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost compared to higher-wattage parts. The data suggests this is a balanced processor that performs at the level of previous-generation flagship parts, but with better efficiency.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69,996 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1% delta, confirming its position in the upper echelon of desktop processors.

The GPU, Intel Arc B580, shows a different story. Its average benchmark score is 23,021, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (score 23,061, 0.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (score 22,895, 0.6% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (score 23,172, 0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA P106-100 (score 23,249, 1% higher). This indicates the B580 performs at a level comparable to older high-end cards, but its percentile ranking shows it is not a top-tier GPU by current standards.

In specific GPU tests, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,068. Geekbench OpenCL scores 92,821, and Vulkan scores 109,672. PassMark tests show: G3D score of 15,748, G2D score of 709, GPU compute score of 7,729, DirectX 9 score of 183, DirectX 10 score of 76, DirectX 11 score of 128, and DirectX 12 score of 76.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 81, which reflects the strong CPU pulling up the overall score despite a more modest GPU. The combined picture shows a system that is CPU-bound in many scenarios, with the processor providing headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize at lower resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 68th percentile. This 26-point gap indicates that the processor is significantly more capable than the graphics card, which creates a bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads.

In gaming, this means that at lower resolutions (1920x1080), the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles, as the CPU can easily keep up with frame generation. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p, many games show high frame rates, but the GPU is working at its limit. At higher resolutions (2560x1440 and 3840x2160), the GPU becomes even more of a constraint, as pixel throughput demands increase.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides evidence of this bottleneck. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 150 FPS at 1080p to 99 FPS at 1440p to 56 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-limited system, where the CPU has sufficient headroom to maintain high frame rates if the GPU could deliver them. In contrast, a CPU-limited system would show similar frame rates across resolutions.

The pair rank by FPS is 2,830 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 98.1. This ranking places the combination in the lower-middle tier of all possible CPU+GPU pairings, which is consistent with the GPU being the weaker component. The data suggests that for maximum performance, a stronger GPU would be needed to match the CPU’s capabilities, but for balanced workloads, this pairing delivers solid results at 1080p and playable frame rates at 1440p.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings is available for a wide range of games across three resolutions. The data is marked as measured, indicating real-world testing rather than estimates.

At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance in esports titles. Valorant leads with 344 FPS, followed by CS:GO with 332 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 183 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege reaches 178 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 150 FPS, and Roblox achieves 194 FPS. These numbers indicate excellent performance for competitive gaming at 1080p.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance varies. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 44 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 40 FPS, and The Medium at 31 FPS, which are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 22 FPS, indicating heavy GPU load. However, many other titles perform well: Assetto Corsa at 89 FPS, Control at 62 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 54 FPS.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still leads with 293 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 228 FPS. Warzone maintains 163 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege hits 117 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 99 FPS. For AAA games, Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 33 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 30 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. The Medium runs at 26 FPS.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes challenging for demanding titles. Valorant still holds 235 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 135 FPS. Warzone achieves 138 FPS, but most other games drop below 60 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 56 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 22 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 7 FPS, which is unplayable.

The overall picture shows a system that excels at 1080p for most games, delivers playable frame rates at 1440p for many titles, and struggles with demanding AAA games at 4K.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize strong CPU performance for both gaming and productivity tasks. The 94th percentile CPU makes it suitable for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p, especially in esports titles where the high frame rates (344 FPS in Valorant, 332 FPS in CS:GO) provide a competitive edge.

Content creators will benefit from the 8-core/16-thread CPU with a multithread score of 36,470, which handles video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation effectively. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 ensures responsive performance in daily tasks and applications that rely on single-core speed.

Software developers will find the CPU attractive for compilation tasks and running virtual machines, given the 16 threads and 32 MB of L3 cache. The ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use.

Students and small business users who need a reliable desktop for office work, web browsing, and light content creation will find this system more than adequate. The CPU’s efficiency (65 W TDP) keeps power consumption low, though the GPU adds 190 W.

The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking means this is not a system for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing workloads. Users seeking maximum graphics performance should look elsewhere, but for 1080p and 1440p gaming with medium to high settings, this build delivers solid results.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is a discrete graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage (Arc 5). It uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The chip, BMG-G21, features 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. It has 20 ray tracing cores, though tensor core counts are not specified.

The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. The base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz. The card has a TDP of 190 W and requires a 450 W power supply. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and is dual-slot wide, measuring 272 mm in length.

Pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs at the level of older high-end cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,068 indicates moderate DirectX 12 performance. PassMark G3D score of 15,748 is respectable, but the DirectX 10 and 12 scores of 76 suggest some API-specific limitations. The GPU compute score of 7,729 shows reasonable computational throughput.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p and 1440p textures, and the 456 GB/s bandwidth helps with high-resolution assets. The ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration, but the overall performance level means ray tracing will be limited to lighter workloads. The card’s 68th percentile ranking indicates it is a mid-range performer, adequate for mainstream gaming but not for enthusiast-level graphics demands.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles. Valorant runs at 344 FPS, CS:GO at 332 FPS, and Warzone at 183 FPS. This makes it ideal for competitive gaming on high-refresh monitors, where the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4,691 score) ensures minimal input lag.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU with a multithread score of 36,470 can handle game capture and encoding alongside gameplay. At 1080p, games like Warzone (183 FPS) and Fortnite (72 FPS) leave headroom for streaming software, though the GPU’s mid-range performance may require lower game settings to maintain smooth streams.

Video editing: The CPU’s strong multithread performance supports video editing software, with the 16 threads accelerating export and rendering tasks. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM helps with timeline previews and effects, but the 68th percentile GPU ranking means complex effects will be slower than with higher-end cards.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high integer math score (120,788) and floating-point score (77,955) aid in CPU-based rendering. GPU rendering will be limited by the B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is modest compared to higher-tier cards. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for most scenes but may limit very large models.

Software development: The 94th percentile CPU with 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache excels at compilation tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute score of 7,729 can assist with GPU-accelerated workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the fast single-thread performance (4,691) ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a workstation that runs all day.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform. The 9000 series is an active production part, meaning future BIOS updates may support newer CPUs on the same socket. The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel access, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though it will run at the GPU’s maximum supported speed. The suggested PSU is 450 W, which provides headroom for the 190 W GPU and 65 W CPU. The single 8-pin power connector limits GPU upgrade options to cards with similar power requirements unless the PSU is upgraded.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom (94th percentile) that the current B580 (68th percentile) cannot fully utilize. The 450 W PSU may need to be upgraded depending on the new GPU’s requirements. The AM5 socket also allows for CPU upgrades to higher-core-count parts if needed, though the current 8-core/16-thread configuration is already strong.

The memory support for DDR5 with ECC is a workstation-friendly feature. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for storage and other expansion cards, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a minor limitation for bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU scores 69,996, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875), 0.2% lower than the Core i7-14700KF (70,163), 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515), and 0.9% higher than the Core i7-14700K (69,355). It sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance ranking compared to other cards?

A: The GPU scores 23,021, placing it in the 68th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the RX 580 2048SP (0.2% higher), RTX 2080 (0.6% lower), RTX 3080 (0.7% higher), and P106-100 (1% higher).

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, with a pair rank of 2,830 out of 3,732 pairs. The average FPS across all tested games is 98.1.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can be expected at 1080p?

A: Measured FPS at 1080p ultra settings shows 344 FPS in Valorant, 332 FPS in CS:GO, 194 FPS in Roblox, 183 FPS in Warzone, and 150 FPS in Counter-Strike 2. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 44 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22 FPS.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W. The GPU has a TDP of 190 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 5 processor, with the Intel Arc B580, a 12 GB Xe2-HPG graphics card. The CPU is in the 94th percentile of all processors, making it a high-end part, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile, representing a mid-range graphics solution. The combined percentile is 81.

The pairing is characterized by a significant CPU advantage, which makes it well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like content creation, software development, and esports gaming. The GPU provides adequate performance for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with measured frame rates exceeding 100 FPS in several competitive titles. For AAA games at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with 4K performance often falling below 60 FPS.

The system is best described as a high-performance desktop for users who need strong CPU capabilities and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance. The upgrade path is clear: the AM5 platform and PCIe Gen 5 support allow for future CPU upgrades, and the 450 W PSU provides some headroom for a modest GPU upgrade. This build is ideal for gamers at 1080p, content creators who rely more on CPU than GPU, and professionals needing a reliable workstation with ECC memory support.