SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) using TSMC’s 4 nm process, with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It pairs with Intel Arc A380E, a 6 nm Xe-HPG GPU from the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation, featuring 1024 shading units, 8 ray tracing cores, and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus. This desktop build lands at the 66th combined percentile, indicating a solid mid-to-upper tier configuration. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs shows strong processing capability, while the GPU’s 50th percentile places it exactly at the median of all GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that excels in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. Its Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, includes 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The cache hierarchy provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache — a balanced design for gaming and productivity tasks.

Benchmark scores reveal the CPU’s dual nature. Single-threaded performance is strong, with a 3dmark single-thread score of 1008 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3761. These numbers suggest excellent responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on one or two fast cores. The 3dmark 2-thread score of 1989 and 4-thread score of 3839 show scaling efficiency as more threads are engaged.

Multi-threaded performance is where the 8700F shines. The 3dmark 16-thread score reaches 7883, nearly matching the max-threads score of 7861, indicating that the processor fully utilizes all 16 threads without significant scaling drop-off. Cinebench R23 multicore results hit 26646, while Geekbench multicore sits at 13523. PassMark multithread score of 30893 and integer math score of 100371 further confirm strong parallel processing capability.

The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for an 8-core processor. This low power envelope, combined with the 4 nm process, suggests the CPU can sustain high clocks without exotic cooling. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 support ensures the cores have adequate data throughput for memory-intensive tasks.

The CPU’s nearest rivals provide context. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS by just 0.4% in average benchmark score, essentially a statistical tie. Against the Intel Core i5-13600H, the 8700F leads by 0.6%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is 0.9% behind, while the Intel Core i7-13700TE is 0.9% ahead. This clustering around the 30,500-31,000 average score range shows the 8700F sits in a competitive mid-range performance tier.

Data compression and encryption results are particularly strong: PassMark data compression scores 378160, and data encryption reaches 22117. Extended instructions score 28474, indicating robust SIMD and vector processing capabilities. The floating-point math score of 62629 and random string sorting at 45425 round out a versatile processing profile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and strong single-thread score of 1008 in 3dmark suggest it can keep up with fast graphics cards in most titles. However, the Arc A380E’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and modest 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will likely limit frame rates at high settings, particularly at higher resolutions. Gamers targeting 1080p with medium settings may see playable frame rates, but high-refresh 144 Hz+ monitors will probably exceed what this GPU can deliver in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous game rendering and x264/x265 encoding tasks. The 65 W TDP means thermal headroom is sufficient for sustained loads during long streaming sessions.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance is decisive here. The 3dmark max-threads score of 7861 and PassMark multithread score of 30893 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and faster render times in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 16 MB L3 cache aids in handling large media files, though the 6 GB GPU memory may limit GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in CPU-based rendering workloads. Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11191 and R15 multicore score of 2685 indicate strong performance in Blender, Maya, or 3ds Max CPU rendering. The Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 ray tracing cores can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, though its 6 GB memory may constrain very large scenes.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 16 threads and high integer math score of 100371. The PassMark data encryption score of 22117 supports secure coding workflows. Fast single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2290) ensures quick IDE responsiveness and fast unit test execution. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity but offers headroom for future needs. The single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures snappy spreadsheet, document, and browser performance. The low 65 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU mean this system is quiet and energy-efficient for dorm rooms or small offices.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear asymmetry: the CPU is substantially stronger than the GPU. The Ryzen 7 8700F sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile. This 32-percentile gap indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-bound workloads.

In gaming, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread 1008, Cinebench R23 single-core 3761) means it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will constrain frame rates in graphically intensive titles. The 6 GB VRAM on a 96-bit bus may also cause texture thrashing at higher settings in modern games.

For productivity, the bottleneck flips. The GPU’s 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs provide adequate 2D acceleration and light GPU compute, but the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (3dmark 16-thread 7883, Cinebench R23 multicore 26646) will outpace the GPU in most rendering tasks. CPU-bound workloads like data compression (378160 in PassMark) or integer math (100371) will run at full speed, while GPU-accelerated tasks will hit the Arc A380E’s ceiling.

The 83.2 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth versus the GPU’s 186.0 GB/s tells a similar story. The GPU has more bandwidth but less compute, suggesting it is designed for efficiency rather than peak performance. The combined 66th percentile for this build reflects this imbalance — the whole is less than the sum of its parts for gaming, but quite capable for CPU-centric work.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU capability. Content creators working in CPU-heavy applications like video encoding or 3D modeling will benefit from the Ryzen 7 8700F’s 16 threads and high Cinebench scores. The 65 W TDP makes it an excellent choice for small form factor or quiet workstation builds where power efficiency matters.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the high integer math score of 100371 and multithread performance. Students or office workers who occasionally edit photos or videos but primarily run productivity software will find this system responsive and reliable, though the GPU is more than sufficient for their needs.

Gamers should approach this build with caution. The Arc A380E’s 50th percentile ranking means it will handle esports titles and older games at 1080p, but modern AAA games will require reduced settings. This is not a high-refresh gaming rig; it is a workstation that can play games on the side.

Small business workstations handling data analysis, financial modeling, or database workloads will benefit from the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and strong PassMark data compression score of 378160. The 250 W suggested PSU keeps the entire system cost and energy footprint low.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the Arc A380E’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 1080p gaming at high settings will likely produce playable but not exceptional frame rates in most titles. Esports games like CS:GO or League of Legends, which favor CPU performance, should see higher frame rates due to the Ryzen 7 8700F’s strong single-thread score of 1008 in 3dmark.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM will become limiting factors. Frame rates will drop noticeably in demanding titles, and texture quality may need to be reduced to stay within VRAM limits. The 8 ray tracing cores provide Ray Tracing support, but the modest 4.096 TFLOPS compute means ray-traced effects will be costly.

The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution. The 3dmark 2-thread score of 1989 suggests strong dual-core performance for games that utilize fewer threads, while the 16-thread score of 7883 future-proofs against multi-threaded game engines.

For a more accurate estimate, the combined 66th percentile of this build suggests it sits above entry-level but below mainstream gaming performance. Users seeking 60+ FPS in modern AAA titles at high settings should consider a stronger GPU. Those playing older or less demanding games will find this configuration adequate.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 7 8700F?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, making it power-efficient for its 8-core, 16-thread configuration.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A380E require external power connectors?

A: No, the GPU has no power connectors and has a 75 W TDP, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: This build sits at the 66th combined percentile, while the CPU alone ranks at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Intel Arc A380E have?

A: The GPU features 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 8700F overclockable?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 7 8700F use?

A: It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform with PCIe Gen 4 support, providing 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 8700F achieves an average benchmark score of 30746, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, competitive with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30879 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548 (0.6% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 (0.9% lower), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028 (0.9% higher). The tight clustering within ±1% shows the 8700F is well-positioned in its performance tier.

Specific benchmark highlights include Cinebench R23 multicore at 26646, Geekbench multicore at 13523, and PassMark multithread at 30893. The single-thread results are equally impressive: Cinebench R23 single-core 3761, Geekbench single-core 2290, and PassMark single-thread 3872. The 3dmark suite shows progressive scaling from 1008 (single-thread) to 7883 (16-thread), demonstrating efficient thread utilization.

The Intel Arc A380E has no individual benchmark scores in the FACT PACK and an average benchmark score of 0, but its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs provides context. The GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate entry-level discrete graphics performance. The 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM are modest but functional for 1080p gaming.

The combined picture shows a CPU-dominant system. The 66th combined percentile reflects the GPU pulling the overall score down from the CPU’s 82nd percentile. This is a system optimized for processing tasks, with graphics capability as a secondary consideration.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing AMD’s Ryzen 7 8700F with Intel’s Arc A380E. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 8000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture and manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. The GPU is Intel’s Alchemist (Arc 3) generation, built on Xe-HPG architecture using a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors.

The combined 66th percentile places this system in the upper-mid range of all configurations. The CPU’s 82nd percentile is the standout feature, indicating top-tier processing capability for its class. The GPU’s 50th percentile is exactly average, making this a lopsided pairing that excels at CPU-bound work.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is designed for stationary use with a standard AM5 motherboard. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and GPU’s 75 W TDP combine for a total of 140 W of component power, well within the 250 W suggested PSU rating. This is a low-power system suitable for quiet operation and modest cooling requirements.

The Arc A380E is marked as end-of-life with a successor in Battlemage, while the Ryzen 7 8700F remains active in production. This suggests the GPU may be a place-holder or budget option, while the CPU offers a longer upgrade runway.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation socket with ongoing support. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

The suggested PSU for this build is 250 W, which is modest given the 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades. A more powerful GPU could be installed without requiring a PSU change, as long as it stays within the 250 W budget. For example, a GPU with a 150 W TDP would still leave room for the CPU and system components.

The GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support. The Arc A380E is currently end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor. Upgrading to a newer Intel GPU or a competitor’s product would be straightforward, as the slot and PSU have headroom.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking means it can support significantly more graphics performance. The 250 W PSU would need to be checked against a new GPU’s requirements, but many mid-range GPUs fit within this budget. The CPU’s 16 threads and high multi-core scores ensure it will not bottleneck a faster GPU in most workloads.

The AM5 platform also offers CPU upgrade options, though the 8700F’s strong performance means a CPU swap is less urgent. The 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking to extract additional performance without platform changes. The 4 nm process and 25,000 million transistor count suggest this CPU will remain relevant for several years.