SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER pairing creates a unique desktop configuration where a high-core-count Zen 4 processor meets a flagship-class Blackwell graphics card. The data presents a peculiar contrast: the CPU sits in the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s benchmark score places it in the 19th percentile, though that GPU figure comes from a single test. This combination demands careful analysis of where the actual performance boundaries lie, especially since no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 8700F and the RTX 5080 SUPER is asymmetric, and the benchmark data reveals which component carries which workload. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores are robust: Cinebench R23 multi-core hits 26,646, while the single-core score is 3,761. This suggests a processor capable of feeding even demanding graphics workloads in most scenarios. However, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,075 is the only graphics benchmark available, and it positions the card near rivals like the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163, a -2.8% delta) and the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182, a -3.4% delta). Those rival comparisons are misleading for a card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 10,752 shading units, but the data shows what it shows.

The bottleneck analysis hinges on workload type. For lightly threaded tasks, the CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,989 and single-thread score of 1,008 indicate strong per-core performance, meaning the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz supports this. Conversely, in heavily threaded workloads such as 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU’s 16 threads become the constraint. The 3DMark max-thread score of 7,861 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 7,883, showing that scaling plateaus beyond 16 threads. This is a classic sign that the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are the ceiling for parallel workloads, while the GPU’s massive compute resources (56.28 TFLOPS FP32) remain underutilized in those scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the FACT PACK, as no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. The data instead points to a theoretical balance: at lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3,872) will likely drive frame rates, while at higher resolutions, the GPU’s memory bandwidth (1.02 TB/s) and pixel rate (293.1 GPixel/s) become dominant. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s for DDR5 is a potential constraint when feeding the GPU’s 24 GB frame buffer, but the dual-channel configuration is standard for this class. The data implies that the CPU will bottleneck the GPU in 1080p gaming, while 4K workloads will shift the balance toward the GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30,746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, but the nearest rivals highlight how tight the competition is. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30,879, a mere -0.4% delta, while the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30,548, a +0.6% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is at 30,468 (+0.9%), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31,028 (-0.9%). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the 8700F is effectively tied with a range of mobile and desktop processors in aggregate performance. The specific tests tell a richer story: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26,646 and Geekbench multi-core at 13,523 both confirm strong multi-threading, while PassMark integer math (100,371) and floating-point math (62,629) show balanced compute capabilities.

The GPU’s benchmark picture is sparse and puzzling. The only score is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3,075, which yields a 19th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This is almost certainly an artifact of limited testing, as the card’s specifications suggest far higher performance. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163, -2.8%), NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2,983, +3.1%), Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182, -3.4%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2,967, +3.6%). These are all low-end or legacy parts, which is incongruent with a 24 GB GDDR7 card. The combined percentile for the build is 51, which lands it exactly in the middle of all possible configurations. This suggests that the CPU’s high percentile (82) is dragged down by the GPU’s low percentile (19), creating a balanced-but-unremarkable overall tier.

The combined picture is one of mismatch: a top-tier CPU paired with a GPU whose benchmark data is either incomplete or anomalous. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,008 and 2-thread score of 1,989 indicate strong gaming potential, while the GPU’s raw specs (10,752 shading units, 336 tensor cores, 84 RT cores) suggest extraordinary rasterization and ray tracing capability. The data cannot confirm the GPU’s true standing, so the build’s overall tier rests on the CPU’s proven performance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance is the key enabler. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,008 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,872 indicate that the 8700F can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 1.02 TB/s bandwidth and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate will handle 1440p and 4K rendering without issue, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock is sufficient for 144Hz gaming at 1080p, but the GPU will be the star at higher resolutions.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,893 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,191 provide headroom for encoding alongside gaming. The GPU’s 336 tensor cores could offload encoding tasks, but the data does not specify encoder capabilities. The CPU’s 65W TDP is low, leaving thermal and power headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage the CPU’s multi-core scores: Geekbench multi-core at 13,523 and Cinebench R23 at 26,646. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 GB VRAM accelerate effects and timeline rendering, but the CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are the limiting factors for scrubbing and preview. The data suggests a capable editing rig for 4K footage, though 8K timelines would strain the CPU.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya relies on both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,685 and R20 score of 11,191 indicate solid CPU rendering, while the GPU’s 10,752 shading units handle GPU-accelerated renders. The 84 RT cores support ray-traced workflows. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors, but the GPU’s 19th percentile is a red flag that the data may not reflect true rendering performance.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 378,160 and data encryption score of 22,117. These indicate strong compile times and cryptographic operations. The 16 threads handle parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 3,872 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, making the CPU the primary driver.

Student and office work is overkill for this pairing. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,872 and the GPU’s massive compute resources are far beyond office suite requirements. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power draw reasonable, but the GPU’s 415W TDP makes this a workstation-class build, not an energy-efficient desktop for basic tasks. The data shows this is a professional tool, not a casual machine.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 4K resolution with maximum settings are the primary audience. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth handle 4K textures, while the CPU’s single-thread performance prevents bottlenecking at high frame rates. The 82nd CPU percentile ensures no CPU-induced stutters in demanding titles. For 1080p competitive gaming, the CPU is sufficient, but the GPU is overkill; the data suggests the CPU will bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will find the CPU’s multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 at 26,646) and the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM valuable for timeline editing and effects. The 336 tensor cores support AI-accelerated tools, and the 84 RT cores enable real-time ray-traced previews. The CPU’s 65W TDP allows for compact cooling solutions in a workstation chassis.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s data compression (378,160) and encryption (22,117) scores. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread performance (3,872 PassMark) keeps the UI responsive. The GPU is unnecessary for development but provides headroom for testing GPU-accelerated applications.

Students in engineering or data science fields will benefit from the CPU’s floating-point math (62,629) and integer math (100,371) scores for simulations. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates CUDA workloads, though the 415W TDP requires a robust power supply. Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads will use the CPU’s 16 threads and 82nd percentile ranking, but the GPU is likely underutilized unless the business does CAD or video work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data does not contain any game-specific benchmarks, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the CPU’s and GPU’s synthetic scores. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,989 and single-thread score of 1,008 suggest strong per-core performance for gaming. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075 is the only graphics metric, but its low percentile (19) contradicts the card’s specifications.

Estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings would be CPU-bound in most titles. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,872 and 5.00 GHz boost clock should drive high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles. The GPU’s 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate ensures no rasterization bottleneck. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, with the 1.02 TB/s bandwidth handling high-resolution textures. At 4K, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 become the dominant factors, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 84 RT cores, but no specific benchmark data exists. The 336 tensor cores enable DLSS-like upscaling, potentially boosting frame rates in supported titles. The CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache may limit performance in games with large world streaming, but the dual-channel DDR5 memory (83.2 GB/s) mitigates this. These are estimates; the absence of measured data means actual FPS could vary significantly.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, enabling a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio).

Memory consists of 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 2295 MHz, boosting to 2617 MHz. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The single benchmark score of 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is the only data point. This places the GPU in the 19th percentile, which is anomalously low given the specifications. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163, -2.8%) and Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182, -3.4%), both of which are far less capable on paper. The data suggests either a driver issue, a thermal throttle, or an incomplete benchmark run. For rendering workloads, the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 GB VRAM indicate strong performance for GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 19th percentile score cannot be reconciled with the specs. The 415W TDP and dual-slot cooler indicate a power-hungry card that requires substantial cooling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16. This means the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 interface will run at Gen 4 speeds unless the motherboard supports Gen 5 natively, which is a potential bottleneck for data transfer. The CPU’s 65W TDP is low, leaving ample power headroom, but the GPU’s 415W TDP requires a substantial power supply. The power connector is a single 16-pin, and the card is dual-slot.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with more cores on the AM5 platform, as the 8700F’s 8 cores and 16 threads are the limiting factor in multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark max-thread score of 7,861 shows plateauing beyond 16 threads, so a CPU with more cores would improve rendering and compilation times. Alternatively, a GPU with a higher benchmark score would address the 19th percentile ranking, but the 24 GB VRAM is already generous. The PCIe 5.0 bus on the GPU suggests that a motherboard with Gen 5 support would be a prerequisite for full bandwidth.

The memory support is limited to DDR5, and the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is standard for dual-channel. Upgrading to higher-speed DDR5 modules could improve memory bandwidth, but the CPU’s memory controller may not benefit significantly. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared, which is smaller than some rivals, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock compensates in single-threaded tasks. The platform is actively produced, and the CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking despite the 65W TDP.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30,746.

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain any measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false, so all frame rates are estimates from synthetic scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is within 1% of its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30,879, -0.4%), Intel Core i5-13600H (30,548, +0.6%), Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30,468, +0.9%), and Intel Core i7-13700TE (31,028, -0.9%).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s and an effective memory speed of 32 Gbps.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU scores 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs, though this single score is anomalously low.

Q: What socket and memory does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 with dual-channel DDR5 memory, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.10 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes and has no integrated graphics. It is an active product with an unlocked multiplier, released on March 31, 2024.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26,646 and R20 at 11,191 indicate solid multi-threaded capability, while the single-core scores (R23 at 3,761, R20 at 1,579) confirm good per-core performance. Geekbench multi-core at 13,523 and single-core at 2,290 align with these results. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 100,371 and floating-point math at 62,629 are high, while data compression at 378,160 and encryption at 22,117 are notable. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1,008 (single-thread) to 7,883 (16-thread), with the max-thread score of 7,861 nearly identical, indicating that additional threads beyond 16 would not help.

The average benchmark score is 30,746, placing the CPU in the 82nd percentile. This is a high ranking, but the nearest rivals are all within 1%, meaning the 8700F is competitive but not dominant. The 65W TDP is low for the performance, making it efficient for a desktop CPU. The 4 nm process and 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest strong single-thread performance for gaming and productivity.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile is 51, placing it exactly in the middle of all possible builds. This is a direct result of the CPU’s 82nd percentile being offset by the GPU’s 19th percentile. The CPU is a high-end 8-core Zen 4 part with proven multi-threaded performance, while the GPU is a flagship-class Blackwell card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range based on the combined percentile. The CPU’s benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 at 26,646, Geekbench at 13,523) are strong for productivity, while the GPU’s single 3DMark score of 3,075 is not representative of its theoretical capability. The CPU is the clear strength of this pairing, with the GPU’s data being insufficient to draw firm conclusions.

The 65W CPU TDP and 415W GPU TDP create a power-hungry system, but the CPU’s low power draw leaves headroom for overclocking. The AM5 platform offers an upgrade path to more powerful CPUs, while the PCIe 5.0 GPU interface is future-proof. This is a desktop build aimed at users who need CPU-heavy productivity and GPU-accelerated workloads, though the GPU’s benchmark data raises questions about its real-world performance. The pairing is logical on paper but requires validation through additional testing.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds