SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B580 represents a compelling mid-range desktop configuration, combining a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with Intel’s new Battlemage graphics architecture. This analysis examines the measured performance data from the FACT PACK, focusing on FPS across various titles, benchmark scores, and the balance between the two components. The data indicates a system designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming with respectable capabilities at higher resolutions, though it shows clear limitations in the most demanding scenarios.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The measured FPS data at ultra settings reveals a system that excels at 1920x1080, delivers strong playable performance at 2560x1440, and struggles to maintain high frame rates at 3840x2160. Across the 55 games listed, the average FPS at 1080p is approximately 99.7, placing this pairing at rank 2764 out of 3732 pairs. This indicates a solidly above-average configuration, though not at the top tier of performance.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding titles show significant strain on the GPU. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 43.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 42.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a mere 22 FPS. These numbers indicate that while the system is capable of running these games, achieving a smooth 60 FPS experience at ultra settings will require lowering graphical presets. Conversely, esports and lighter titles perform exceptionally well: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 329.3 FPS, Valorant reaches 340.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 178 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down as expected. Call of Duty: Warzone remains highly playable at 132 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 maintains 96.5 FPS. However, the GPU becomes the limiting factor in graphically intensive games. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 34.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 14 FPS, making these titles essentially unplayable at this resolution with ultra settings. The average across all games at this resolution is noticeably lower, indicating that 1440p is viable for many titles but not for the most demanding AAA releases.

At 3840x2160, the Arc B580’s 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for ultra settings in most modern games. The majority of titles fall below 40 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 20.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22.9 FPS. Only the most optimized or older titles, such as Valorant (233.8 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (133.7 FPS), achieve smooth frame rates. For 4K gaming, this configuration requires substantial settings reductions or the use of upscaling technologies, though the data does not include specific upscaling frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B580 is heavily skewed toward the GPU being the primary bottleneck in gaming, particularly at higher resolutions. This is evident from the FPS scaling pattern: as resolution increases from 1080p to 1440p, average frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% across most titles, and then further by another 40-50% at 4K. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario, where the graphics card’s rendering throughput, rather than the CPU’s processing power, determines the final frame rate.

The CPU’s capacity is demonstrated by its benchmark scores. The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 974 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2374 in Geekbench single-core, which are strong numbers for a modern processor. Its multi-threaded performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799. These scores indicate that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with draw calls and game logic calculations without becoming a bottleneck at 1080p in most titles. The pair’s average FPS of 99.7 at 1080p, with peaks exceeding 300 FPS in esports titles, confirms that the CPU can handle high frame rate scenarios.

However, the CPU percentile ranking of 77 (vs. all CPUs) and the GPU percentile of 68 (vs. all GPUs) suggest a slight mismatch. The CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios like high-FPS esports at 1080p, the GPU may reach its limit first. The data for Valorant at 340.1 FPS and CS:GO at 329.3 FPS at 1080p shows the GPU still has headroom, but the scaling to 1440p (290.4 and 228.6 FPS respectively) shows a more pronounced drop, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor. In contrast, heavily threaded workloads like video editing or 3D rendering would see the CPU as the primary component, with its 6 cores and 12 threads providing solid, but not top-tier, performance.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Ryzen 5 7500F’s benchmark results place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (avgScore 24935, deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avgScore 25005, deltaPct -0.2), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (avgScore 24911, deltaPct 0.2). This places the 7500F in a tight cluster with these chips, showing that its performance is nearly identical to several mobile and desktop processors from different generations. The single-threaded performance is particularly strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2374 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

The Intel Arc B580’s benchmark scores show a GPU in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (avgScore 23061, deltaPct -0.2), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avgScore 22895, deltaPct 0.6), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (avgScore 23172, deltaPct -0.7). The deltaPct values are all within 1% of each other, suggesting that the Arc B580 performs nearly identically to these established GPUs in synthetic benchmarks. However, the RTX 3080 is a significantly more powerful card in real-world gaming, indicating that the Arc B580’s synthetic scores may not fully reflect its actual gaming performance, which is often more variable due to driver optimization.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 73, which is a reasonable representation of the overall system capability. The CPU’s strong scores (77th percentile) are slightly offset by the GPU’s lower position (68th percentile), resulting in a balanced but not exceptional pairing. The 3dmark scores for the GPU, such as 3068 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, are respectable for a mid-range card. The CPU’s 3dmark_16_threads score of 6376 and 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 further confirm its strong compute capabilities. Overall, the data shows a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming and productivity tasks, but which will be the bottleneck in 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This configuration is primarily aimed at gamers targeting 1920x1080 resolution with high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows that this pairing can deliver over 100 FPS in most titles at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive esports players. For example, Valorant runs at 340.1 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 148 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU also provides a buffer for future game releases that may require more memory at this resolution.

Content creators and developers working with CPU-intensive tasks will also find this system suitable, but with some caveats. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 and Geekbench multicore score of 12362, is strong for its class. Video editing, software compilation, and 3D rendering workloads that can utilize 6 cores and 12 threads will see good performance. However, for professionals who need maximum throughput, a higher-core-count CPU would be more appropriate.

For students and small business workstations, this pairing offers a versatile solution. The CPU’s single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3841) ensures snappy application loading and responsive multitasking. The GPU’s capability to handle light to moderate graphics workloads, such as CAD or photo editing (Passmark G2D score of 709), makes it a capable all-rounder. The data does not indicate a specific target for 1440p or 4K gamers, as the FPS figures at those resolutions are often below the 60 FPS threshold for a smooth experience in AAA titles.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and features a base clock of 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. This architecture provides a substantial IPC (instructions per clock) uplift over previous generations, which is reflected in its benchmark scores.

The processor’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and other latency-sensitive workloads. Memory support is limited to DDR5, with a dual-channel bus providing a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is also present, which is a feature valued in entry-level workstations.

Benchmark scores indicate a processor with excellent single-thread performance and solid multi-thread capability. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 and Passmark single-thread score of 3841 place it among the better-performing desktop CPUs for tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and gaming. The multi-threaded scores, such as Cinebench R23 multicore at 22799 and Passmark multithread at 26825, show that it can handle moderately parallel workloads effectively. The Passmark data compression score of 305925 and encryption score of 17510 further illustrate its utility in file archiving and security-related tasks. The TDP of 65 W is notably low for a desktop CPU, making it an energy-efficient choice. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, and its 5.00 GHz boost clock provides a solid foundation for such endeavors.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The system excels here at 1080p, with measured FPS of 340.1 in Valorant, 329.3 in CS:GO, and 176.7 in Rainbow Six Siege X. These figures support 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors in esports titles. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2374) keeps frame times low, while the Arc B580’s 12 GB VRAM ensures no memory-related stutters in typical esports titles.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU provides sufficient headroom for software encoding on an x264 preset. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799 suggests that while streaming and gaming simultaneously will impact performance, it is manageable at 1080p. The GPU’s performance in games like Call of Duty: Warzone at 149 FPS (1080p) leaves some CPU headroom for encoding tasks, though a dedicated streaming PC or NVENC encoder would be more efficient.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core scores (Geekbench multicore 12362) are adequate for 1080p video editing and rendering timelines. The GPU’s Passmark compute score of 7729 and its DirectX 12 support can accelerate effects and exports in supported software. For 4K editing, the system would be slower, as the data shows performance drops significantly at higher resolutions.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 and R23 scores (9575 and 22799 respectively) are respectable for a mid-range CPU, allowing for moderate 3D rendering workloads. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 ray tracing cores enable real-time viewports and GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Unreal Engine, though render times will be longer than with higher-end GPUs.

Software development: The Ryzen 5 7500F’s strong single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread 3841) ensures fast code compilation for smaller projects. The multi-thread scores are sufficient for parallel builds, and the 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The system is well-suited for a developer’s workstation, especially with ECC memory support.

Student and office work: With a Passmark single-thread score of 3841 and a 65W TDP, this CPU is an efficient and responsive choice for everyday tasks. The GPU’s G2D score of 709 is adequate for 2D applications and light graphics work. The system is quiet, cool, and fast for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a forward-looking platform as of the data’s release date. This socket supports DDR5 memory, which is the current standard. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is a baseline figure; users can potentially achieve higher bandwidth with faster DDR5 kits, though the data does not specify supported memory speeds. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5, with 24 lanes available from the CPU. However, the Arc B580 GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it will not take full advantage of the Gen 5 lanes.

The CPU’s TDP of 65W is low, and the GPU’s TDP is 190W, with a suggested PSU of 450W. This leaves substantial headroom for upgrades. A user could upgrade to a more powerful GPU in the future, as the 450W PSU recommendation is for the current configuration. The 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU is standard, and a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for a more power-hungry GPU. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a notable feature for workstation use, and the unlocked multiplier allows for CPU overclocking to extend its lifespan.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the Arc B580 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking suggests it has more headroom to drive a more powerful graphics card. The data shows the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, so a GPU upgrade would yield the most significant FPS gains. Alternatively, if CPU-heavy workloads become a priority, upgrading to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU would be possible, though the data does not specify which specific models are compatible.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the Intel Arc B580. The pair’s combined percentile is 73, placing it in the upper-mid tier of all system configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24964 and the GPU’s average score of 23021 are closely matched in terms of relative performance, with the CPU being slightly stronger. The system is designed for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, as confirmed by the measured FPS data across a wide variety of titles. While it can handle 1440p in many games, it is not a 4K gaming system based on the ultra-settings FPS figures. The pairing represents a balanced mid-range configuration that excels in esports and mainstream gaming, with the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s ample 12 GB VRAM providing a solid foundation.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS of this CPU+GPU pair across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all games at 1920x1080 is 99.7, placing the pair at rank 2764 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K ultra settings?

A: No, the measured FPS at 3840x2160 is 20.1, which is not a playable frame rate. Even at 2560x1440, the FPS is 34.8.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13620H?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H’s score of 24911.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Arc B580 and what PSU is suggested?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has a TDP of 190W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450W.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc B580 has 20 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a dual-channel DDR5 bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the GPU has a 192-bit GDDR6 bus with a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz and features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial for its class, with an FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1). It has 20 ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines. The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B580 scores 3068 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, 15748 in Passmark G3D, and 92821 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its Passmark GPU compute score is 7729. These scores place it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with its average benchmark score of 23021 being nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (deltaPct 0.6) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (deltaPct -0.2). The data shows the GPU’s performance is most competitive at 1080p, where its 12 GB VRAM is less of a constraint. At 4K, the memory bandwidth and raw compute power become limiting, as evidenced by the significant drop in measured FPS. The card’s 190W TDP and dual-slot design are reasonable for its performance, and its 1x 8-pin power connector is standard for this class.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B580

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds