SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

20,733 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the Intel Arc B580 forms a desktop build that delivers a distinctive blend of a six-core Zen 3 processor and a modern 12 GB graphics card. Benchmark data shows this combination sits at the 71st percentile overall, with the CPU at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile. The measured frame rates across a wide range of games provide a clear picture of what this system can achieve at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, making it a versatile yet balanced option for various computing tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this build is very capable of driving high-refresh monitors in competitive titles. The measured data shows Valorant at 342.7 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 331.4 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 reaches 150 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 178 FPS. These results indicate the pairing can easily exceed the refresh rates of common 144Hz displays in esports shooters, providing a smooth and responsive experience.

Streaming: The Ryzen 5 5600GT's twelve threads, evidenced by a 3dmark_max_threads score of 5554, provide enough parallelism for a game and encoding workload simultaneously. While the CPU handles the game logic, the Arc B580's hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities from the Xe2-HPG architecture can offload the streaming encode task. The measured 87.1 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 76.9 FPS in Outriders at 1080p suggest there is sufficient headroom for a stream overlay without crippling frame rates.

Video Editing: The combination of a 12 GB frame buffer and strong compute scores makes this a viable entry-level editing rig. The GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are well-suited for effects and timeline scrubbing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17272 ensures that export and rendering tasks are handled efficiently, although the 3dmark_16_threads score of 5523 shows that scaling is slightly less than linear beyond 8 threads (4968), which is typical for a six-core part.

3D Rendering: For 3D rendering workloads, the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 20325 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821 provide a solid foundation. In applications that leverage the GPU for final frame renders, the Arc B580's 20 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units can accelerate ray-traced scenes. The processor's 16 MB of L3 cache helps maintain data flow, while the dual-channel DDR4 memory bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most rendering scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's single-threaded performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1843 and a 3dmark_single_thread score of 913, is strong for compiler tasks and code analysis. The twelve threads are useful for parallel build systems, as shown by the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7254. The system's capacity for running multiple virtual machines or containers is supported by the 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 cache per core, which helps isolate workloads effectively.

Student and Office Work: For everyday productivity, this build is more than sufficient. The PassMark single-thread score of 3348 ensures snappy application launches and web browsing, while the data encryption score of 15873 indicates strong performance for file encryption tasks. The GPU's 12 GB memory is ample for running multiple large spreadsheets or documents with many graphical elements, and the system's overall efficiency, with a CPU TDP of 65 W, keeps operational costs low in a quiet office environment.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 5600GT and the Arc B580 is workload-dependent. In gaming, the data suggests that the GPU is often the limiting factor at higher resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 44 FPS at 1080p to 22 FPS at 4K, a scaling pattern that indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 falls from 40 FPS at 1080p to 22.3 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's performance ceiling is being reached.

However, in lighter titles, the CPU can become the constraint. The average FPS across all games is 98, but in a game like Valorant, the 342.7 FPS at 1080p suggests that the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to feed the GPU at very high frame rates. The CPU's percentile of 74 versus the GPU's 68 indicates that the processor is slightly more capable relative to its peers, meaning in less demanding titles, the GPU might hold back the CPU from achieving its maximum potential frame output.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, paired with a PCIe Gen 3 interface (16 lanes from the CPU), is a potential bottleneck for the GPU. The Arc B580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which when run on a Gen 3 slot, operates at Gen 3 x8 speeds. This configuration can slightly reduce data transfer rates, but the measured FPS data shows that this does not severely hamper performance in most games, as evidenced by high scores in titles like Counter-Strike 2 (150 FPS at 1080p). The 3dmark scores, such as 5,523 for 16 threads, show that the CPU can handle a substantial load, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15748 places it in the 68th percentile, making it the more likely candidate to limit frame rates in graphically intensive scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature ecosystem. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the platform's memory bus provides 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. For storage and expansion, the CPU offers PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The system's power requirements are modest, with the CPU's TDP at 65 W and the GPU's TDP at 190 W, suggesting a power supply with a 450 W rating is suggested by the GPU's specifications.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase memory capacity, as the system supports standard DDR4 modules. For storage, adding a PCIe Gen 3 NVMe SSD would take advantage of the CPU's available lanes. The GPU's power connector is a single 8-pin, and the card is dual-slot in width, measuring 272 mm in length, which fits most standard mid-tower cases. Since the CPU has an integrated Radeon Vega 7, it provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed, and the platform's active production status means BIOS updates are likely to continue.

In terms of processing power, the CPU is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked is true), allowing for overclocking to boost the 3.60 GHz base clock toward the 4.60 GHz boost clock. The 7 nm TSMC process node with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die is efficient. The upgrade path is limited by the AM4 socket, which does not support newer CPU generations, but the current CPU is still a capable performer, as shown by its 74th percentile ranking.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a gamer who plays at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 and wants high frame rates in esports titles and playable performance in AAA games. The measured data shows that at 1080p, games like Call of Duty: Warzone (130 FPS) and Ready Or Not (121.2 FPS) are very smooth, while at 1440p, titles like Fortnite (46 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (33 FPS) are more demanding. This is an ideal setup for a competitive gamer who also enjoys a variety of single-player titles.

Content creators, particularly those working in 1080p video editing or light 3D rendering, will find the 12 GB VRAM and the CPU's multithreading capabilities beneficial. The system can handle 4K video playback and editing timelines with multiple tracks, though final exports would benefit from more cores. Software developers who work with large codebases will appreciate the fast single-thread performance and the twelve threads for parallel builds, as evidenced by the Geekbench multicore score of 7986.

Students and small business workstations are also a good fit. The system's 65 W CPU TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP mean it doesn't require an elaborate cooling solution, and the performance is more than adequate for office suites, web browsing, and light photo editing. For users who want to play older or less demanding games, the build excels, with titles like Barony (124.2 FPS) and Dave The Diver (120.5 FPS) running at high frame rates at 1080p. The overall performance tier, combined with the 71st combined percentile, places this build in a sweet spot for users who need a balanced system without extreme performance in any single area.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The processor is built on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². It features a three-level cache hierarchy: 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2438 and the Geekbench single-core score of 1843 indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for gaming and office applications. The multi-core performance is solid, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17272 and a PassMark multithread score of 20325. The 3dmark scores, which scale from 1,794 for 2 threads to 5,554 for max threads, show that the processor scales well with thread count, though the scaling from 8 threads (4968) to 16 threads (5523) is modest, reflecting the 6-core/12-thread configuration.

The processor's average benchmark score is 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12490F (avg score 20802, delta -0.3%), the Intel Xeon 6325P (avg score 20821, delta -0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (avg score 20826, delta -0.4%). These deltas indicate that the Ryzen 5 5600GT is essentially neck-and-neck with these competitors, all within a 0.5% margin of each other, making it a highly competitive option in its performance class.

For real workloads, the 12 threads are sufficient for modern gaming, which often uses 8 threads or fewer, and the single-thread performance ensures good frame pacing in CPU-bound games. In productivity, the PassMark scores show strong performance in integer math (69566) and floating-point math (39817), which are relevant for scientific calculations and financial modeling. The data compression score of 258882 is excellent for file archiving, and the extended instructions score of 18041 indicates good support for modern SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions, benefiting video encoding and cryptography workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage generation, and is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a die size of 272 mm², with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU has a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, and its memory runs at 2375 MHz with an effective data rate of 19 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 20 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities are rated at 13.67 TFLOPS for FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. The card is dual-slot in width, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a TDP of 190 W, with a suggested power supply of 450 W.

In benchmark tests, the Arc B580 shows solid performance. Its PassMark G3D score is 15748, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 is strong, indicating good performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068, while a specific test, demonstrates the GPU's capability in modern DX12 workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7729 is respectable for compute tasks.

The GPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (avg score 23061, delta -0.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avg score 22895, delta 0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (avg score 23172, delta -0.7%). These small deltas (all within 1%) show that the Arc B580 is performance-comparable to these older and newer high-end cards, which is remarkable given its 12 GB VRAM capacity. For rendering, the 12 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing larger textures and more complex scenes to be loaded without swapping. The 20 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, and the 456.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the GPU can quickly access textures and geometry data.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a comprehensive look at how this build performs across a wide range of games and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 98 FPS across all games, with a rank of 2835 out of 3732 pairs. This indicates that the build is above average for gaming performance, but not at the top tier.

For esports and competitive titles, the performance is exceptional. Valorant leads with 342.7 FPS, followed by CS:GO with 331.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege with 178 FPS. These high frame rates ensure a competitive edge with minimal input lag. At 2560x1440, these titles still run very well, with Valorant at 290.3 FPS and CS:GO at 228.6 FPS, making 1440p high-refresh gaming a viable option.

For AAA single-player games, the performance is more varied. At 1080p, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 130 FPS, which is excellent, while Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 44 FPS, which is playable but not high-refresh. Red Dead Redemption 2 is demanding, with 40 FPS at 1080p and 28.7 FPS at 1440p. The 4K performance is generally not suitable for demanding games, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 22 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22.3 FPS.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent across most titles, with a typical drop of 50-60% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a similar drop from 1440p to 4K. For example, Control drops from 64.3 FPS at 1080p to 49.6 FPS at 1440p and 34.9 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU is sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 1080p.

Older and indie titles perform exceptionally well. Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 145.3 FPS at 1080p, and Roblox at 193.8 FPS. The build is also capable of handling simulation games, with Microsoft Flight Simulator at 52.6 FPS at 1080p. The data shows that for the vast majority of games, 1080p high setting gameplay is smooth, with 1440p being a good target for less demanding titles or those with upscaling enabled.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance and why does it matter?

A: The CPU's single-thread performance is evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 913 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1843. This matters because many games and everyday applications rely heavily on single-thread performance for responsiveness and frame pacing.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This capacity is beneficial for high-resolution textures and large datasets in creative and AI workloads.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, the system can run older or less demanding games at playable frame rates (e.g., CS:GO at 131.4 FPS, Valorant at 228.9 FPS), but more demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (22 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (22.3 FPS) will not be smooth. It is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Q: What is the power consumption requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and the GPU has a TDP of 190 W. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, which provides enough headroom for the entire system, including other components.

Q: What is the CPU's memory and PCIe support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes for the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: How does this build compare to similar CPU and GPU combinations?

A: The build's combined percentile is 71. The CPU is at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile. The CPU's closest rival is the Intel Core i5-12490F, with a delta of -0.3%, while the GPU's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, with a delta of 0.6%.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked. The CPU's base clock is 3.60 GHz and boost clock is 4.60 GHz, and with a 65 W TDP, there is some thermal headroom for overclocking on a capable air cooler.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its best scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore of 17272 and a single-core of 2438, along with a Geekbench multicore of 7986 and single-core of 1843. In PassMark tests, it scores 20325 in multithread and 3348 in single-thread. The 3dmark tests show a max-thread score of 5554 and a single-thread score of 913. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within a 0.5% margin, with the Intel Core i5-12490F being the closest at -0.3%.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23021, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its strongest results are in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 109672 and OpenCL with 92821. In PassMark, it scores 15748 in G3D and 7729 in GPU compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3068. The GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (delta 0.6%) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (delta -0.2%), showing it competes with older high-end cards.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU's 74th percentile versus the GPU's 68th percentile suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform better than in GPU-bound ones. The average FPS across all games of 98 and the pair rank of 2835 out of 3732 confirm that this is a solid mid-range performer. The data indicates that the CPU is not a significant bottleneck for the GPU in most gaming scenarios, as the GPU often reaches its limits first, especially at higher resolutions.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT desktop processor with the Intel Arc B580 graphics card. It is classified as a desktop build, with a combined percentile of 71. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 12 GB Battlemage card with a 190 W TDP. The overall tier of this build is above average, placing it in the 71st percentile overall.

The pair's performance is characterized by strong 1080p gaming capabilities, with an average of 98 FPS across all measured games. The system is well-suited for high-refresh esports gaming and can handle 1440p in many titles. The CPU's performance is competitive with newer Intel parts, and the GPU offers a unique mix of large VRAM and modern features. The build's efficiency and platform maturity make it a reliable choice for users who want a balanced desktop system for gaming and productivity. The data confirms that this is a well-matched pairing, with the CPU providing ample processing power and the GPU delivering solid rasterization and ray tracing performance for its class.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + Intel Arc B580

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds