GEFORCE

NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

6 GB
VRAM
MHz Boost
250W
TDP
384
Bus Width

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 Specifications

⚙️

Tesla M2090 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The NVIDIA Tesla M2090 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
512
Shaders
512
TMUs
64
ROPs
48
SM Count
16
⏱️

Tesla M2090 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the Tesla M2090's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Tesla M2090 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
651 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective
Shader Clock
1301 MHz
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

NVIDIA's Tesla M2090 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Tesla M2090's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
6 GB
VRAM
6,144 MB
Memory Type
GDDR5
VRAM Type
GDDR5
Memory Bus
384 bit
Bus Width
384-bit
Bandwidth
177.4 GB/s
💾

Tesla M2090 by NVIDIA Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Tesla M2090, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
768 KB
📈

Tesla M2090 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
1,332.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (Double)
666.1 GFLOPS (1:2)
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
🏗️

Fermi 2.0 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The NVIDIA Tesla M2090 is built on NVIDIA's Fermi 2.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Tesla M2090 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GPU Name
GF110
Process Node
40 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
3,000 million
Die Size
520 mm²
Density
5.8M / mm²
🔌

NVIDIA's Tesla M2090 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Tesla M2090 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
250 W
TDP
250W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Suggested PSU
600 W
📐

Tesla M2090 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
248 mm 9.8 inches
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Display Outputs
No outputs
Display Outputs
No outputs
🎮

NVIDIA API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA Tesla M2090. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
CUDA
2.0
Shader Model
5.1
📦

Tesla M2090 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The NVIDIA Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Tesla M2090 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
NVIDIA
Release Date
Jul 2011
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Tesla
Successor
Tesla Kepler

Tesla M2090 Benchmark Scores

geekbench_openclSource

Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how NVIDIA Tesla M2090 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.

geekbench_opencl #317 of 582
13,075
3%
Max: 380,114
Compare with other GPUs

About NVIDIA Tesla M2090

The NVIDIA Tesla M2090, built on the Fermi 2.0 architecture, was engineered for high-performance computing rather than gaming, but its specifications offer a fascinating glimpse into professional-grade hardware. While its 6 GB of GDDR5 memory is substantial, the card's primary design for double-precision floating-point calculations means its gaming performance is not comparable to contemporary GeForce cards. The 250W TDP indicates a power-hungry component requiring robust system cooling, which is typical for data center hardware. Its PCIe 2.0 x16 interface, while standard for its 2011 release, can bottleneck data transfer speeds compared to modern PCIe standards. Benchmark scores like its Geekbench OpenCL result of 13,075 points highlight its raw compute power, but this does not directly translate to high frame rates in games. The card lacks dedicated gaming optimizations, meaning drivers and features like real-time ray tracing are absent. For a tech-savvy user, the M2090 represents a specialized tool whose strengths lie far outside the gaming arena.

When assessing frame rates and resolution support, the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 from NVIDIA faces significant limitations for modern gaming. Designed for computational workloads, its architecture lacks the single-precision optimizations and driver-level game support found in gaming GPUs. At 1080p resolution, the card would struggle to deliver playable frame rates in most titles released after its 2011 launch date. The 6 GB VRAM buffer is adequate for texture storage at lower resolutions, but the memory bandwidth and core architecture are not tuned for high-speed rendering. Its capabilities are more aligned with basic display output and non-real-time rendering tasks. For benchmark enthusiasts, its performance would fall drastically short of even entry-level gaming cards from the same era. Evaluating this card for gaming provides a clear case study in the divergent paths of professional compute and consumer graphics architectures.

  1. Lacks dedicated gaming drivers and optimizations for modern titles.
  2. Struggles with playable frame rates at 1080p in post-2011 games.
  3. No support for contemporary rendering features like ray tracing or DLSS.
  4. Requires a high-capacity power supply due to its 250W TDP.
  5. PCIe 2.0 interface may limit data throughput compared to newer systems.

Examining modern rendering features reveals the largest gap for the Tesla M2090 from NVIDIA when considered for gaming. Technologies such as real-time ray tracing, variable rate shading, and AI-driven super-resolution (DLSS) are completely absent, as they were developed years after this card's release. The Fermi architecture predates the fundamental hardware changes required for these advanced techniques. Its feature set is confined to DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.2, placing it far behind current API standards. For a benchmark-focused audience, this means any performance testing would be restricted to older synthetic benchmarks or very dated game engines. The card's value lies purely in its historical context as a powerful compute accelerator, not as a viable gaming solution in the modern landscape.

For users curious about pushing the limits of legacy hardware, the Tesla M2090 might be tested with a selection of older games. Recommended titles would be those from the early 2010s or prior, such as *Battlefield 3*, *The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim*, or *Portal 2*. Settings would need to be configured to low or medium presets at 720p or 1080p resolution to achieve potentially stable frame rates. The 6 GB of memory is overkill for these titles, but the core processing power remains the limiting factor. The primary takeaway is that this GPU, while a computational powerhouse in its domain, is fundamentally unsuited for a modern gaming rig. Its real-world application is a benchmark of pure compute, not graphical fidelity.

The AMD Equivalent of Tesla M2090

Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular NVIDIA Tesla M2090 Comparisons

See how the Tesla M2090 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Tesla M2090 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs