AMD Radeon R9 M265X
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon R9 M265X Specifications
Radeon R9 M265X GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon R9 M265X GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
R9 M265X Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon R9 M265X's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon R9 M265X by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon R9 M265X Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon R9 M265X's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon R9 M265X by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the R9 M265X, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
R9 M265X Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon R9 M265X against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 1.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is built on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the R9 M265X will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon R9 M265X Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon R9 M265X determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon R9 M265X to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon R9 M265X by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon R9 M265X are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon R9 M265X. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon R9 M265X Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon R9 M265X by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon R9 M265X Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon R9 M265X handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms.
About AMD Radeon R9 M265X
The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is a mobile graphics processor built on the GCN 1.0 architecture, featuring the Venus chip manufactured on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus. Released on March 20, 2014, this end-of-life part scores 8851 points in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, placing it in the 43rd percentile among all GPUs tracked in the database. The data shows a tightly clustered competitive set, with the nearest rivals all within 1.2% of its score.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M265X delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 8851. Its 43rd percentile ranking indicates that it outperforms 43% of all GPUs in the database, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the performance distribution. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560, scores 8899, which translates to a delta of -0.5% relative to the R9 M265X. This means the R9 trails the GTX 560 by half a percentage point, a margin that is effectively negligible in real-world compute workloads.
Looking ahead, the R9 M265X leads the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 by 1% (8851 vs 8761), the AMD Radeon 550X by 1.2% (8851 vs 8749), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile by 1.2% (8851 vs 8746). These deltas are remarkably small, underscoring that the R9 M265X occupies a narrow performance band where a single benchmark run could reorder the standings. The FP32 compute throughput is 800.0 GFLOPS, which is consistent with the observed OpenCL score. The pixel rate stands at 10.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate at 25.00 GTexel/s, both derived from the base clock of 575 MHz and boost clock of 625 MHz. Memory bandwidth is 64.00 GB/s, a figure that may constrain performance in bandwidth-sensitive tasks, yet the compute score suggests the architecture compensates reasonably well.
Power and Cooling
The FACT PACK does not list a TDP value for the R9 M265X, nor does it provide a suggested PSU rating or any power connector requirements. This absence of data means the database offers no quantitative guidance on power draw or cooling specifications. The GPU is built on a 28 nm process with 1,500 million transistors packed into a 123 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 12.2M per mm². The memory subsystem runs at 1000 MHz (4 Gbps effective) with a 2 GB GDDR5 configuration on a 128-bit bus, delivering 64.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is the sole connection specification provided. Without a TDP figure, the thermal design cannot be classified by wattage, but the 28 nm process node and the 1,500 million transistor count suggest a moderate thermal envelope relative to newer, more efficient nodes. The lack of a suggested PSU implies that system integrators must rely on the host platform's existing power delivery, though the specific requirements remain unquantified in the data.
How It Compares
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560: The R9 M265X scores 8851 against the GTX 560's 8899, a delta of -0.5%. The R9 trails by a negligible margin, effectively placing the two GPUs in a statistical tie for this OpenCL workload. The GTX 560 is an older desktop-oriented part, yet the mobile R9 holds its ground within half a percent.
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100: The R9 M265X leads the Pro WX 5100 by 1% (8851 vs 8761). The Pro WX 5100 is a workstation-focused GPU, but the R9's compute score is slightly higher. This indicates that the GCN 1.0 architecture in the R9 delivers competitive OpenCL performance against a newer professional part, at least in this specific benchmark.
AMD Radeon 550X: The R9 M265X is 1.2% ahead of the Radeon 550X (8851 vs 8749). The 550X is a later mobile GPU, yet the R9's raw compute score edges it out. The small delta suggests that the R9's older architecture remains competitive in pure compute throughput, despite the generational gap.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile: The R9 M265X also leads the RTX 3050 A Mobile by 1.2% (8851 vs 8746). The RTX 3050 A is a modern part with dedicated ray tracing cores, but in the Geekbench OpenCL test, the R9's score is slightly higher. This highlights that the R9's compute throughput is still relevant, even when compared to a much newer GPU with advanced features.
FAQ
Q: What is the Geekbench OpenCL score of the AMD Radeon R9 M265X?
A: The R9 M265X scores 8851 points in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark.
Q: What memory configuration does the R9 M265X use?
A: It uses 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 64.00 GB/s and a memory clock of 1000 MHz (4 Gbps effective).
Q: What is the production status of the R9 M265X?
A: The production status is listed as End-of-life.
Q: What API versions are supported by the R9 M265X?
A: It supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170.
Q: What is the architecture and process node of the R9 M265X?
A: It uses the GCN 1.0 architecture with the Venus chip, built on a 28 nm process at TSMC.
Q: Does the R9 M265X have dedicated ray tracing cores?
A: No, the FACT PACK lists RT cores as null, indicating no dedicated ray tracing hardware.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The R9 M265X has no dedicated ray tracing cores (RT cores are null) and no tensor cores. Consequently, hardware-accelerated ray tracing is not supported by this GPU. The feature set relies entirely on the GCN 1.0 architecture. The GPU supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. The DirectX 12 support is at the 11_1 feature level, meaning it can run DirectX 12 titles but with a feature set limited to that specific level. OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.2.170 provide modern cross-platform API access, which is notable for a GPU from this era. The compute capability is 800.0 GFLOPS FP32, and the pixel rate is 10.00 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 25.00 GTexel/s, derived from the 16 ROPs and 40 TMUs respectively. The 640 shading units handle general compute and shader workloads. The memory bandwidth of 64.00 GB/s is a key constraint for texture-heavy scenes, but the architecture's compute throughput remains serviceable for its class. Without RT or tensor cores, any ray tracing or AI-accelerated features must fall back to compute shaders, which is impractical for real-time ray tracing given the 800.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput. The API support, however, ensures compatibility with modern graphics stacks, even if the hardware lacks specialized acceleration blocks.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon R9 M265X
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon R9 M265X Comparisons
See how the Radeon R9 M265X stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon R9 M265X with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs