AMD FirePro W600
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD FirePro W600 Specifications
GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD FirePro W600 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
FirePro W600 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the FirePro W600's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The FirePro W600 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's FirePro W600 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The FirePro W600's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
FirePro W600 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the FirePro W600, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
FirePro W600 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD FirePro W600 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 1.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD FirePro W600 is built on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the FirePro W600 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD FirePro W600 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the FirePro W600 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
FirePro W600 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD FirePro W600 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD FirePro W600. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
FirePro W600 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the FirePro W600 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
About AMD FirePro W600
AMD FirePro W600 is an end-of-life professional graphics card built on GCN 1.0 architecture with a 28 nm process, featuring 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Its single benchmark result in Geekbench OpenCL is 6205 points, placing it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. The card targets multi-display professional workloads with six mini-DisplayPort 1.2 outputs, a 75 W TDP, and no auxiliary power connectors, making it a low-profile solution for workstation environments that prioritize output count over raw compute.
How It Compares
Against the AMD Radeon HD 6950, the FirePro W600 trails by a negligible 0.1% in average benchmark score. The HD 6950 scores 6210 versus the FirePro’s 6205, meaning the two are effectively identical in OpenCL performance. This parity is notable because the HD 6950 is a consumer gaming card from the same era, while the FirePro W600 is a professional multi-display product — the data shows the FirePro sacrifices no compute capability for its six-output design.
The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 edges out the FirePro W600 by 0.6%, with a score of 6241 against 6205. The GT 1010 is a modern entry-level desktop card, yet the older FirePro remains within striking distance. Benchmark results indicate the FirePro’s GCN architecture still holds up against much newer silicon in raw OpenCL throughput, though the GT 1010’s advantage, while small, is consistent.
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes in at 6163 points, which is 0.7% lower than the FirePro W600’s 6205. This integrated GPU from Intel’s Broadwell generation trails the discrete FirePro in compute performance, but the margin is remarkably tight. The data suggests that for OpenCL workloads, the FirePro’s discrete memory bandwidth and shading units provide only a marginal edge over a high-end integrated solution from that era.
The NVIDIA Quadro K620, a professional workstation card, scores 6286, which is 1.3% higher than the FirePro W600. This is the largest performance gap among the nearest rivals, but it remains small in absolute terms. The Quadro K620 is a newer design, yet the FirePro W600’s 64.00 GB/s memory bandwidth and 768.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput keep it competitive in OpenCL benchmarks, despite the K620’s slight advantage.
Who Should Consider It
The FirePro W600 is best suited for users who need six independent display outputs from a single-slot card, as its 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 configuration is its defining feature. For multi-monitor trading desks, digital signage, or control-room walls, the card’s 2 GB GDDR5 memory and 128-bit bus provide sufficient bandwidth for 2D desktop workloads and light 3D rendering across multiple screens. Benchmark results indicate that its OpenCL score of 6205 is adequate for compute-assisted tasks like video transcoding or GPU-accelerated filters in professional applications, but not for heavy 3D simulation.
At 1080p resolution, the FirePro W600 can handle moderate OpenCL workloads, as its 768.0 GFLOPS FP32 rate is comparable to the Intel Iris Pro 6200 and slightly behind the Quadro K620. For users running CAD or visualization software that offloads to OpenCL, the card will perform adequately for basic viewport manipulation and rendering previews. However, for 4K or multi-4K output, the 2 GB memory capacity may become a limiting factor, especially with large textures or high-resolution framebuffers.
The card’s 75 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it an attractive option for legacy workstations with limited power delivery or small form-factor chassis. The 168 mm length and single-slot width allow installation in compact systems where modern cards might not fit. Users with older PCIe 3.0 motherboards will find full compatibility, and the DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170 API support ensures broad software compatibility, though the card’s end-of-life status means no future driver optimizations.
Benchmark Performance
In Geekbench OpenCL, the FirePro W600 scores 6205 points, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. This percentile rank indicates that the card outperforms roughly one-third of the GPU population in compute workloads, which is respectable for a 2012-era professional product. The average benchmark score of 6205 serves as the baseline for all comparisons, and the nearest rivals cluster tightly within a 2% band, suggesting that the FirePro W600 occupies a performance tier where architectural differences matter less than driver optimization and workload characteristics.
Against the AMD Radeon HD 6950, the FirePro W600 shows a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning it is effectively tied. The HD 6950’s 6210 score is only 5 points higher, a margin that falls within typical benchmark variance. This near-identical performance is surprising given the HD 6950’s larger memory bus and higher transistor count, but the FirePro’s GCN 1.0 architecture with 512 shading units delivers comparable OpenCL throughput. The data implies that for compute tasks, the two cards are interchangeable, despite their different market positions.
The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010, with a score of 6241, leads the FirePro by 0.6%. This 36-point gap is small but consistent, and it reflects the GT 1010’s newer architecture and higher clock efficiency. However, the FirePro counters with 64.00 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus the GT 1010’s narrower configuration, which may benefit bandwidth-sensitive OpenCL kernels. Benchmark results indicate that the FirePro can hold its own against this modern entry-level card, though the GT 1010 has the edge in raw compute throughput.
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200, scoring 6163, trails the FirePro by 0.7%. The FirePro’s 42-point advantage over this integrated GPU is modest, but it demonstrates that a discrete card with dedicated GDDR5 memory and a 128-bit bus still outperforms even the best integrated graphics of that generation. The texture rate of 24.00 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 12.00 GPixel/s give the FirePro a clear advantage in memory-bound workloads, where the Iris Pro’s shared system memory becomes a bottleneck.
The NVIDIA Quadro K620 is the strongest rival, scoring 6286, which is 1.3% higher than the FirePro. This 81-point gap is the largest among the four rivals, but it is still small in absolute terms. The K620’s advantage likely stems from its newer Kepler architecture and higher clock speeds, but the FirePro’s 512 shading units and 768.0 GFLOPS FP32 performance keep it competitive. For OpenCL workloads, the data shows the FirePro W600 is within striking distance of a professional card that is several generations newer, making it a viable option for legacy systems.
FAQ
Q: What is the FirePro W600’s OpenCL benchmark score?
A: The card scores 6205 points in Geekbench OpenCL, which places it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs.
Q: How does the FirePro W600 compare to the NVIDIA Quadro K620?
A: The Quadro K620 scores 6286, which is 1.3% higher than the FirePro W600’s 6205. The FirePro trails by 81 points, the largest gap among its nearest rivals.
Q: Does the FirePro W600 require external power connectors?
A: No, the card has no power connectors and its TDP is 75 W. AMD suggests a 250 W power supply for the system.
Q: How many display outputs does the FirePro W600 support?
A: It features 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 outputs, allowing up to six independent displays from a single-slot card.
Q: What is the memory configuration of the FirePro W600?
A: The card has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 64.00 GB/s of memory bandwidth at 1000 MHz (4 Gbps effective).
Q: Is the FirePro W600 better than the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200?
A: Yes, the FirePro scores 6205 versus the Iris Pro’s 6163, a 0.7% advantage. The discrete card’s dedicated memory and bandwidth give it a slight edge in OpenCL tasks.
Power and Cooling
The FirePro W600 has a TDP of 75 W, which is remarkably low for a professional card with 512 shading units. This power envelope allows for a single-slot cooling solution, with the card measuring 168 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The lack of power connectors means the card draws all its power from the PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, simplifying installation in systems with limited PSU cabling. AMD recommends a 250 W power supply, which is easily met by most workstation power supplies, even those from the early 2010s.
Cooling is handled by a passive or low-profile active solution, depending on the variant, but the 75 W TDP ensures that heat output remains manageable in a well-ventilated chassis. The single-slot design is a key advantage for dense multi-GPU configurations or systems with limited expansion slots. The card’s dimensions allow it to fit in most standard ATX and some compact chassis, though the 111 mm height may interfere with tall heatsinks on adjacent components.
The 28 nm process node from TSMC, with 1,500 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, contributes to the card’s efficiency. The transistor density of 12.2 million per square millimeter is modest by modern standards, but it was competitive for the era. The memory operates at 1000 MHz with 4 Gbps effective data rate, drawing minimal additional power. For users building a multi-display workstation, the FirePro W600 offers a complete solution without requiring PSU upgrades or custom cooling, making it a drop-in replacement for older FirePro Terascale cards.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD FirePro W600 are below.
Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD FirePro W600 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersPopular AMD FirePro W600 Comparisons
See how the FirePro W600 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs