Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 380 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 256 | 268 | 282 | 428 |
| 1440p QHD | 320 | 336 | 352 | 535 |
| 1080p Full HD | 375 | 393 | 413 | 605 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Valorant across all tested resolutions and settings, with the data showing average FPS figures that consistently exceed 250 even at 4K Ultra. This combination ranks in the 51st percentile among all tested combos for this game, placing it in the 1484th position out of 2883 total combinations, which indicates a strong but not top-tier standing. The measured results reveal that this system is heavily CPU-bound at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes more relevant at higher settings and 4K, though both components prove more than capable of driving competitive frame rates.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data for Valorant with this combination shows that the Low preset delivers the highest average frame rates at every resolution, with 605 FPS at 1080p, 535 FPS at 1440p, and 428 FPS at 4K. These figures represent the absolute ceiling of performance for this hardware pairing, but competitive players may find that the Medium preset offers a better balance between visual clarity and raw speed.
At 1920x1080, the Medium preset produces an average of 413 FPS with a minimum of 351 FPS and a maximum of 475 FPS. This represents a drop of 192 FPS compared to Low, but the minimum frame rate of 351 FPS still vastly exceeds the refresh rate capabilities of virtually all gaming monitors. The High preset at 1080p yields 393 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 375 FPS. The gap between Medium and Ultra at 1080p is only 38 FPS (413 vs 375), suggesting that players who prioritize visual fidelity without sacrificing competitive performance can comfortably use Ultra settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. Low produces 535 FPS average, Medium drops to 352 FPS with a minimum of 300 FPS and maximum of 405 FPS, High delivers 336 FPS, and Ultra maintains 320 FPS. The minimum frame rate of 300 FPS at Medium settings remains above the threshold for high-refresh-rate displays, making this the recommended preset for 1440p gaming. The difference between Medium and Ultra at this resolution is 32 FPS, which is a relatively small penalty for the visual improvements Ultra provides.
At 3840x2160, the data shows a more pronounced impact from settings changes. Low produces 428 FPS average, but Medium drops to 282 FPS with a minimum of 239 FPS and maximum of 324 FPS. High yields 268 FPS, and Ultra falls to 256 FPS. The minimum frame rate of 239 FPS at Medium settings is still very high for 4K gaming, but the drop from Low to Medium at this resolution is substantial at 146 FPS. For 4K users, Medium represents the sweet spot, offering over 280 FPS average while maintaining a minimum above 235 FPS.
The best experience per the measured rows is the Medium preset at 1080p or 1440p, as it provides the optimal combination of frame rate consistency and visual quality. The minimum FPS figures of 351 FPS at 1080p and 300 FPS at 1440p show that the system never dips below 300 FPS in these configurations, which is ideal for competitive play.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 1484 out of 2883 tested combinations places this system in the upper-middle tier of all hardware pairings tested in Valorant. This position, representing approximately the 51st percentile, indicates that while this combination is not among the elite performers, it sits comfortably above the median of all tested configurations.
The ranking context becomes clearer when examining the individual component benchmarks. The Intel Core i7-12700KF holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T with an average score of 35403 (a delta of -0.1%), the Intel Core 5 213PE at 35428 (-0.2%), the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (+0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 (+0.2%). These tiny deltas, all within 0.2% of each other, show that the 12700KF performs essentially identically to its closest competitors in synthetic benchmarks.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 holds a 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21153 (-0.6%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M at 21237 (-1%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT at 20713 (+1.6%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile at 21379 (-1.6%). The GPU’s 66th percentile is notably lower than the CPU’s 85th percentile, suggesting that the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing.
In Valorant specifically, the combo’s 51st percentile rank relative to all tested combinations is lower than what either component’s individual percentile might suggest. This is likely because Valorant is a highly CPU-bound title, and many competing combos pair top-tier CPUs with mid-range GPUs, which can achieve similar or better results. The data shows that this system’s performance is strong but not exceptional within the broader context of all tested hardware configurations.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS this combination achieves in Valorant?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 605, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the maximum performance ceiling for this hardware pairing.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287). The performance differences among these rivals are negligible, all within 0.2%.
Q: Does the RTX 5050 outperform the RX 5600 XT in GPU benchmarks?
A: Yes, the RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, which is 1.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT’s score of 20713.
Q: What is the minimum FPS at 1440p Medium settings?
A: The minimum FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 300 FPS, with an average of 352 FPS and a maximum of 405 FPS.
Q: How many cores and threads does the i7-12700KF have?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.
Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested configurations in Valorant?
A: The combination of Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1484th out of 2883 tested combos in Valorant.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured data shows a clear hierarchy across settings. Low settings produce an average of 605 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combination at any resolution or preset. Medium settings yield 413 FPS average with a minimum of 351 FPS and maximum of 475 FPS. High settings deliver 393 FPS average, and Ultra settings produce 375 FPS average. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a total drop of 230 FPS, with the largest single step being the 192 FPS difference between Low and Medium.
The 2560x1440 results follow a similar pattern but with lower absolute values. Low settings produce 535 FPS average. Medium settings yield 352 FPS average with a minimum of 300 FPS and maximum of 405 FPS. High settings deliver 336 FPS average, and Ultra settings produce 320 FPS average. The total drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 215 FPS, and the step from Low to Medium accounts for 183 FPS of that decline.
At 3840x2160, the data reveals a more compressed range. Low settings produce 428 FPS average. Medium settings yield 282 FPS average with a minimum of 239 FPS and maximum of 324 FPS. High settings deliver 268 FPS average, and Ultra settings produce 256 FPS average. The total drop from Low to Ultra at 4K is 172 FPS, which is smaller than at lower resolutions. The step from Low to Medium at 4K is 146 FPS, which is the largest single drop in this resolution.
The Medium preset is the only settings level that includes minimum and maximum FPS data across all three resolutions. At 1080p, the spread from minimum to maximum is 124 FPS (351 to 475). At 1440p, the spread is 105 FPS (300 to 405). At 4K, the spread is 85 FPS (239 to 324). This narrowing spread at higher resolutions indicates that frame time consistency improves as resolution increases, likely due to reduced CPU bottlenecking.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows how performance scales as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 605 at 1080p to 535 at 1440p, a decline of 70 FPS or approximately 11.6%. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Low settings reduces the average from 535 to 428 FPS, a decline of 107 FPS or approximately 20%. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 177 FPS, representing a 29.3% reduction.
At Medium settings, the scaling pattern is more pronounced. The average FPS drops from 413 at 1080p to 352 at 1440p, a decline of 61 FPS or approximately 14.8%. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 352 to 282 FPS, a decline of 70 FPS or approximately 19.9%. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings is 131 FPS, representing a 31.7% reduction.
High settings show a similar trend. The average FPS drops from 393 at 1080p to 336 at 1440p, a decline of 57 FPS or approximately 14.5%. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 336 to 268 FPS, a decline of 68 FPS or approximately 20.2%. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings is 125 FPS, representing a 31.8% reduction.
Ultra settings exhibit the steepest relative scaling. The average FPS drops from 375 at 1080p to 320 at 1440p, a decline of 55 FPS or approximately 14.7%. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 320 to 256 FPS, a decline of 64 FPS or approximately 20%. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings is 119 FPS, representing a 31.7% reduction.
The relative consistency of these percentage drops across settings levels—all hovering around 29-32% from 1080p to 4K—indicates that resolution scaling in Valorant is largely uniform regardless of quality preset. However, the fact that the absolute FPS values remain extremely high even at 4K Ultra (256 FPS) suggests that neither the CPU nor GPU is being pushed to its limit. The relatively modest performance decline from 1080p to 4K, combined with the very high absolute frame counts, points to the CPU as the primary limiting factor at lower resolutions, while the GPU begins to exert more influence at 4K.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700KF features 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This Alder Lake-S architecture processor has a 25 MB shared L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The CPU’s benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and a single-core score of 4071. The Geekbench multicore score is 14367, with a single-core score of 2255.
In Valorant, the CPU’s role is critical because the game’s frame rate is often dictated by single-thread performance and memory latency. The 12700KF’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4071 and its 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 indicate robust per-core performance. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365, places it in the upper tier of processors.
The data supports the conclusion that the CPU is the primary performance driver at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 605 FPS average, which is 40.5% higher than the 428 FPS at 4K Low. This large gap at Low settings suggests that the CPU is capable of generating frame rates far beyond what the GPU can render at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 20 threads provide ample headroom for Valorant’s workload, which typically uses fewer threads but benefits from high clock speeds.
The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is particularly relevant for Valorant, as the game’s engine tends to respond well to high-frequency cores. The single-threaded benchmark scores, including a PassMark single-thread score of 3984 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1043, confirm that this CPU excels in lightly threaded workloads. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K, scores nearly identically with an average benchmark score of 35287, a mere 0.2% difference, indicating that the unlocked KF variant offers no meaningful performance advantage over its K counterpart in synthetic tests.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). The Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, with 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS.
In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5050 achieves a PassMark G3D score of 17326 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2502, which provides a measure of modern gaming performance. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035, places it in the upper-middle tier of graphics cards.
In Valorant, the GPU’s role becomes more significant at higher resolutions and settings. The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system produces 256 FPS average, which is 349 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result of 605 FPS. This substantial gap highlights the GPU’s increasing workload as resolution and quality settings rise. However, even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate remains far above typical display refresh rates, indicating that the GPU is not a limiting factor for competitive play.
The GPU’s memory configuration of 8 GB GDDR6 with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for Valorant, which is not a memory-intensive title. The 128-bit memory bus and moderate bandwidth are adequate for this game’s requirements. The GPU’s boost clock of 2572 MHz provides solid compute throughput, but Valorant’s relatively simple graphics workload means that the GPU rarely becomes the bottleneck except at the highest resolutions.
The comparison with the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 1.6% lower in average benchmark performance, shows that the RTX 5050 is a competitive mid-range GPU. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking, while lower than the CPU’s 85th percentile, is still respectable and more than adequate for Valorant’s demands. The data suggests that in this specific game, the GPU’s performance headroom is substantial, with even the most demanding settings at 4K producing frame rates above 250 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 428.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 282.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 268.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 256.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 535.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 352.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 336.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 320.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 605.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 413.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 393.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 375.0 |
Valorant with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RTX 5050
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.